Felix
#9,457 for girls in 2025, 10 births · #175 for boys in 2025, 2,064 births
Given to boys 99.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1884 · 102 births
- Debut · boys
- 92 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 83,508since 1880
Felix over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Felix has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #9,457 | 10 | #175 | 2,064 |
| 2024 | #9,556 | 10 | #179 | 2,090 |
| 2023 | #12,197 | 7 | #193 | 1,899 |
| 2022 | #10,383 | 9 | #193 | 1,974 |
| 2021 | #7,630 | 14 | #194 | 1,959 |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | #225 | 1,668 |
| 2019 | #7,025 | 16 | #222 | 1,693 |
| 2018 | #8,146 | 13 | #228 | 1,657 |
| 2017 | #7,840 | 14 | #246 | 1,513 |
| 2016 | #11,781 | 8 | #247 | 1,511 |
| 2015 | #6,977 | 17 | #264 | 1,377 |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #267 | 1,379 |
| 2013 | #8,580 | 13 | #297 | 1,180 |
| 2012 | #7,804 | 15 | #315 | 1,039 |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #310 | 1,035 |
| 2010 | — | #329 | 951 | |
| 2009 | — | #339 | 927 | |
| 2008 | — | #353 | 890 | |
| 2007 | — | #379 | 810 | |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #395 | 760 |
| 2005 | #13,010 | 7 | #374 | 770 |
| 2004 | — | #392 | 691 | |
| 2003 | #8,505 | 12 | #376 | 691 |
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 | #394 | 661 |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 | #380 | 684 |
| 2000 | — | #376 | 696 | |
| 1999 | #9,479 | 9 | #388 | 664 |
| 1998 | #9,260 | 9 | #388 | 637 |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | #375 | 646 |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 | #380 | 612 |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #382 | 622 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #390 | 596 |
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | #380 | 607 |
| 1992 | #6,314 | 14 | #346 | 691 |
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | #387 | 585 |
| 1990 | — | #368 | 634 | |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #366 | 611 |
| 1988 | — | #359 | 570 | |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #352 | 551 |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | #376 | 490 |
| 1985 | — | #378 | 479 | |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #364 | 491 |
| 1983 | #6,705 | 9 | #360 | 492 |
| 1982 | — | #351 | 527 | |
| 1981 | #5,254 | 13 | #334 | 555 |
| 1980 | — | #341 | 540 | |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 | #337 | 541 |
| 1978 | — | #332 | 528 | |
| 1977 | #6,892 | 8 | #336 | 534 |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | #336 | 512 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #328 | 538 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #327 | 537 |
| 1973 | — | #315 | 558 | |
| 1972 | #5,109 | 10 | #336 | 527 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #314 | 601 |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | #308 | 639 |
| 1969 | — | #325 | 571 | |
| 1968 | #5,147 | 8 | #319 | 568 |
| 1967 | #6,804 | 5 | #339 | 488 |
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | #326 | 526 |
| 1965 | — | #311 | 593 | |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 | #331 | 566 |
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 | #319 | 614 |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | #325 | 582 |
| 1961 | — | #323 | 586 | |
| 1960 | #4,773 | 8 | #306 | 655 |
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 | #308 | 631 |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #303 | 624 |
| 1957 | #3,696 | 11 | #296 | 648 |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | #306 | 591 |
| 1955 | #5,828 | 5 | #308 | 557 |
| 1954 | — | #305 | 565 | |
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | #296 | 569 |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #309 | 539 |
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | #298 | 537 |
| 1950 | — | #304 | 498 | |
| 1949 | — | #302 | 502 | |
| 1948 | #4,205 | 7 | #315 | 457 |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | #312 | 491 |
| 1946 | — | #307 | 448 | |
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 | #297 | 405 |
| 1944 | — | #288 | 422 | |
| 1943 | — | #301 | 417 | |
| 1942 | — | #305 | 401 | |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | #297 | 382 |
| 1940 | #2,963 | 9 | #283 | 390 |
| 1939 | — | #275 | 398 | |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | #279 | 393 |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 | #273 | 397 |
| 1936 | #2,857 | 9 | #270 | 395 |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #274 | 389 |
| 1934 | #3,802 | 6 | #274 | 387 |
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | #261 | 407 |
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 | #258 | 438 |
| 1931 | #2,972 | 9 | #241 | 480 |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | #243 | 515 |
| 1929 | #4,053 | 6 | #248 | 498 |
| 1928 | #2,284 | 15 | #263 | 468 |
| 1927 | #2,552 | 13 | #234 | 563 |
| 1926 | #3,873 | 7 | #236 | 559 |
| 1925 | — | #217 | 621 | |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | #208 | 662 |
| 1923 | #3,125 | 10 | #206 | 638 |
| 1922 | #3,655 | 8 | #202 | 656 |
| 1921 | #3,164 | 10 | #206 | 667 |
| 1920 | #3,598 | 8 | #199 | 668 |
| 1919 | — | #180 | 725 | |
| 1918 | — | #178 | 746 | |
| 1917 | #3,344 | 8 | #185 | 660 |
| 1916 | — | #173 | 692 | |
| 1915 | — | #189 | 583 | |
| 1914 | — | #172 | 526 | |
| 1913 | — | #186 | 362 | |
| 1912 | — | #192 | 300 | |
| 1911 | — | #179 | 173 | |
| 1910 | — | #176 | 161 | |
| 1909 | — | #165 | 148 | |
| 1908 | — | #182 | 118 | |
| 1907 | — | #188 | 112 | |
| 1906 | — | #168 | 112 | |
| 1905 | — | #169 | 115 | |
| 1904 | — | #175 | 103 | |
| 1903 | — | #175 | 93 | |
| 1902 | — | #154 | 114 | |
| 1901 | — | #202 | 70 | |
| 1900 | — | #170 | 123 | |
| 1899 | — | #164 | 93 | |
| 1898 | — | #162 | 103 | |
| 1897 | — | #159 | 97 | |
| 1896 | — | #196 | 83 | |
| 1895 | — | #141 | 109 | |
| 1894 | — | #190 | 78 | |
| 1893 | — | #168 | 86 | |
| 1892 | — | #163 | 96 | |
| 1891 | — | #152 | 86 | |
| 1890 | — | #186 | 72 | |
| 1889 | — | #160 | 83 | |
| 1888 | — | #148 | 101 | |
| 1887 | — | #151 | 82 | |
| 1886 | — | #153 | 92 | |
| 1885 | — | #166 | 80 | |
| 1884 | — | #137 | 102 | |
| 1883 | — | #178 | 68 | |
| 1882 | — | #151 | 91 | |
| 1881 | — | #168 | 72 | |
| 1880 | — | #147 | 92 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Felix was already there! It came in at #147, and was given to 92 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1894, when fewer than 110 boys a year got the name.
Where Felix is popular in 1910
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Mexico#29 · 1 in 99
- Texas#64 · 1 in 293
- Tennessee#110 · 1 in 600
- Pennsylvania#112 · 1 in 800
- Virginia#140 · 1 in 848
Best ever in a state: #24 in New Mexico, 1913.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #29 | 7 | 1 in 99 |
| Texas | #64 | 31 | 1 in 293 |
| Tennessee | #110 | 8 | 1 in 600 |
| Pennsylvania | #112 | 17 | 1 in 800 |
| Virginia | #140 | 6 | 1 in 848 |
| Oklahoma | #142 | 5 | 1 in 647 |
| Louisiana | #145 | 7 | 1 in 692 |
| Missouri | #161 | 5 | 1 in 996 |
| Illinois | #164 | 7 | 1 in 1,180 |
| Ohio | #166 | 5 | 1 in 1,231 |
| Alabama | #180 | 6 | 1 in 1,099 |
| New York | #208 | 7 | 1 in 2,246 |
| Georgia | #212 | 6 | 1 in 1,499 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Felix
Momentum · boys
Rising
- 4 spots since 2024 (#179 → #175)
- 50 spots since 2020 (#225 → #175)
- 89 spots since 2015 (#264 → #175)
- Biggest jump: 49 spots in 1895 (#190 → #141)
- Biggest drop: 55 spots in 1896 (#141 → #196)
Rise & fade · boys
4 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1884 at #137 (102 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 146 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 824
- Highest: 1 in 824 boys born in 2024 were named Felix (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 828 boys born in 2025 (0.12%)
- Its best rank, #137 in 1884, was only 1 in 1,122 (0.09%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 16.0% of all boys named Felix (13,335) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 863 | #137 (1884) | #156 |
| 1890s | 903 | #141 (1895) | #168 |
| 1900s | 1,108 | #154 (1902) | #175 |
| 1910s | 4,928 | #172 (1914) | #181 |
| 1920s | 6,000 | #199 (1920) | #222 |
| 1930s | 4,199 | #241 (1931) | #265 |
| 1940s | 4,315 | #283 (1940) | #301 |
| 1950s | 5,759 | #296 (1957) | #303 |
| 1960s | 5,749 | #306 (1960) | #322 |
| 1970s | 5,515 | #308 (1970) | #327 |
| 1980s | 5,306 | #334 (1981) | #358 |
| 1990s | 6,294 | #346 (1992) | #378 |
| 2000s | 7,580 | #339 (2009) | #376 |
| 2010s | 13,335 | #222 (2019) | #273 |
| 2020s | 11,654 | #175 (2025) | #193 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Felix in 1910
boys
#176
161 births · 1 in 1,206 boys
Top boys' names in 1910
More about 1910
boys
194,208 boys got a published name in 1910; 1 in 1,206 of them was named Felix, which outranked 90.4% of the 1,839 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Felix
Biggest movers since 1909
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.