Fern

#1,219 for girls in 2025, 186 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #5,659
Given to girls 98.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1916 · 1,332 births
Debut · girls
10 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
37,666
since 1880

Fern over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Fern has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201928peak #152, 1916girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,219186—
2024#1,250186#5,65916
2023#1,421157—
2022#1,478148#12,3305
2021#1,498141—
2020#1,559135—
2019#1,864108—
2018#1,656127—
2017#2,20086—
2016#2,20687—
2015#2,19486—
2014#2,68365—
2013#3,40446—
2012#3,52345—
2011#4,24434—
2010#4,39733—
2009#5,37826—
2008#5,27927—
2007#10,81810—
2006#7,48216—
2005#6,52818—
2004#6,21619—
2003#7,99813—
2002#8,83711—
2001#10,1029—
2000#5,93718—
1999#7,23913—
1998#8,58410—
1997#7,74211—
1996#11,8076—
1995#6,64113—
1994#6,67213—
1993#9,5598—
1992#13,3175—
1991#8,5889—
1990#8,5019—
1989#5,54515—
1988#4,49619—
1987#7,9878—
1986#10,9125—
1985#5,34813—
1984#3,72621—
1983#4,28617—
1982#2,90131—
1981#3,06628—
1980#4,32717—
1979#2,99728—
1978#4,24216—
1977#3,61220—
1976#3,96316—
1975#3,15522—
1974#2,83525—
1973#2,30933—
1972#2,35631—
1971#2,03541—
1970#1,49067#4,7245
1969#1,72849—
1968#1,51956—
1967#1,29970—
1966#1,28471—
1965#1,16884—
1964#1,060105—
1963#1,022109#4,0485
1962#1,12194—
1961#821164—
1960#755183—
1959#702204—
1958#748177—
1957#731187—
1956#629232—
1955#633216—
1954#585237—
1953#543256#2,9058
1952#577226#3,7345
1951#527250—
1950#547228#2,7708
1949#538238#3,6905
1948#528245—
1947#520255—
1946#464284—
1945#442260#2,5748
1944#427281—
1943#423300—
1942#407311#2,9407
1941#396301#3,5055
1940#359328#3,4595
1939#359327—
1938#323377#3,1756
1937#326366#2,33210
1936#303395#2,6298
1935#289429#2,9517
1934#285462#2,7428
1933#275507#1,82915
1932#277503#3,3616
1931#255571#2,20712
1930#246633#3,0228
1929#231679#2,19913
1928#221806#2,27013
1927#219845#1,87118
1926#209912#3,1398
1925#203976#2,08915
1924#1971,059#2,04316
1923#1871,169#1,87418
1922#1821,207#1,95217
1921#1741,297#1,70321
1920#1701,304#1,69421
1919#1761,181#1,97316
1918#1641,341#2,07315
1917#1621,261#1,90016
1916#1521,332#1,77117
1915#1571,175#1,30626
1914#172821#1,68714
1913#166697#1,67611
1912#167613#2,0457
1911#172435#1,3877
1910#174394#1,3147
1909#173345#1,0838
1908#166364—
1907#193276—
1906#181277#1,2535
1905#183273#1,2335
1904#173281—
1903#176276#69611
1902#190238#1,0136
1901#191217—
1900#193266—
1899#182232—
1898#174265—
1897#178237#7878
1896#186218—
1895#199184—
1894#188197#8577
1893#185189#1,0355
1892#192172—
1891#214124—
1890#224119—
1889#230103#9745
1888#26277—
1887#25269—
1886#35636#8456
1885#30344—
1884#30440#9715
1883#43519—
1882#34826—
1881#53910—
1880#54710—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Fern was already there! It came in at #547, and was given to 10 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1986, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Fern is popular in 1928

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNHWashington: #259 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,863 girlsWAIdaho: #132 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 501 girlsIDMontana: #110 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 422 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #91 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 301 girlsNDMinnesota: #91 for girls · 55 births · 1 in 371 girlsMNIllinois: #137 for girls · 75 births · 1 in 764 girlsILWisconsin: #91 for girls · 59 births · 1 in 409 girlsWIMichigan: #177 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 1,287 girlsMINew York: #280 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 2,906 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedRIOregon: #202 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,110 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #59 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 199 girlsSDIowa: #118 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 589 girlsIAIndiana: #181 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,264 girlsINOhio: #218 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 1,824 girlsOHPennsylvania: #165 for girls · 74 births · 1 in 1,183 girlsPANew Jersey: #293 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,758 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #284 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,042 girlsCAUtah: #101 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 381 girlsUTColorado: #125 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 559 girlsCONebraska: #94 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 402 girlsNEMissouri: #123 for girls · 54 births · 1 in 530 girlsMOKentucky: #327 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,776 girlsKYWest Virginia: #308 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,440 girlsWVVirginia: #404 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,002 girlsVAMaryland: #244 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,229 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedDEArizona: #193 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 791 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNMKansas: #96 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 393 girlsKSArkansas: #222 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,090 girlsARTennessee: #385 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,834 girlsTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #146 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 621 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedHITexas: #412 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 2,619 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. South Dakota#59 · 1 in 199
  2. North Dakota#91 · 1 in 301
  3. Minnesota#91 · 1 in 371
  4. Wisconsin#91 · 1 in 409
  5. Nebraska#94 · 1 in 402

Best ever in a state: #19 in Utah, 1912.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Dakota#59281 in 199
Minnesota#91551 in 371
North Dakota#91211 in 301
Wisconsin#91591 in 409
Nebraska#94281 in 402
Kansas#96361 in 393
Utah#101121 in 381
Montana#11091 in 422
Iowa#118321 in 589
Missouri#123541 in 530
Colorado#125151 in 559
Idaho#13271 in 501
Illinois#137751 in 764
Oklahoma#146381 in 621
Pennsylvania#165741 in 1,183
Michigan#177321 in 1,287
Indiana#181201 in 1,264
Arizona#19351 in 791
Oregon#20251 in 1,110
Ohio#218291 in 1,824
Arkansas#222171 in 1,090
Maryland#24461 in 2,229
Washington#25951 in 1,863
New York#280341 in 2,906
California#284181 in 2,042
New Jersey#29381 in 3,758
West Virginia#30881 in 2,440
Kentucky#327101 in 2,776
Tennessee#38571 in 3,834
Virginia#40451 in 5,002
Texas#412231 in 2,619
Alabama———
Alaska———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Mississippi———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Fern
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 31 spots since 2024 (#1,250 → #1,219)
  • 340 spots since 2020 (#1,559 → #1,219)
  • 975 spots since 2015 (#2,194 → #1,219)
  • Biggest jump: 191 spots in 1882 (#539 → #348)
  • Biggest drop: 300 spots in 1962 (#821 → #1,121)
Rise & fade · girls
36 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1916 at #152 (1,332 births)
  • Births halved by 1930, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 82 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 82 yrs · run 1880–1961
Share of babies · girls
1 in 784
  • Highest: 1 in 784 girls born in 1916 were named Fern (0.13%)
  • Latest: 1 in 8,641 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 27.2% of all girls named Fern (10,254) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s434#230 (1889)#358
1890s1,937#174 (1898)#192
1900s2,813#166 (1908)#182
1910s9,250#152 (1916)#166
1920s10,254#170 (1920)#199
1930s4,570#246 (1930)#294
1940s2,803#359 (1940)#450
1950s2,213#527 (1951)#622
1960s985#755 (1960)#1,178
1970s299#1,490 (1970)#2,899
1980s174#2,901 (1982)#5,259
1990s97#6,641 (1995)#8,865
2000s167#5,279 (2008)#7,458
2010s717#1,656 (2018)#2,837
2020s953#1,219 (2025)#1,404

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Fern in 1928

girls
#221
806 births · 1 in 1,431 girls
boys
#2,270
13 births · 1 in 85,201 boys

Top girls' names in 1928

  1. #1Mary66,871
  2. #2Betty36,083
  3. #3Dorothy33,733
  4. #4Helen22,937
  5. #5Margaret20,295
  6. #6Ruth17,859
  7. #7Doris16,575
  8. #8Barbara14,872
  9. #9Virginia14,500
  10. #10Shirley14,215
  11. #221Fern806

Top boys' names in 1928

  1. #1Robert60,701
  2. #2John53,760
  3. #3James52,752
  4. #4William49,118
  5. #5Charles31,243
  6. #6Richard28,793
  7. #7Donald25,704
  8. #8George24,391
  9. #9Joseph22,322
  10. #10Edward18,492
  11. #2,270Fern13
More about 1928

girls

1,153,318 girls got a published name in 1928; 1 in 1,431 of them was named Fern, which outranked 95.9% of the 5,440 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Fern
  1. #218Katie826
  2. #219Lydia815
  3. #220Susan812
  4. #221Fern806
  5. #221Essie806
  6. #223Olive790
  7. #224Annette780
  8. #224Sue780

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1927
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,165Jeanine#3,053 → #888
  2. ↑ 1,368Joline#2,256 → #888
  3. ↑ 1,101Lorelei#2,095 → #994
  4. ↑ 1,063Jeannine#1,384 → #321
  5. ↑ 859Romona#1,456 → #597
Fallers
  1. ↓ 860Valencia#924 → #1,784
  2. ↓ 547Kazuko#955 → #1,502
  3. ↓ 386Matilde#924 → #1,310
  4. ↓ 368Glendora#747 → #1,115
  5. ↓ 366Hilma#924 → #1,290

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,107,613 boys got a published name in 1928; 1 in 85,201 of them was named Fern, which outranked 51.9% of the 4,723 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Fern
  1. #2,162Yancy14
  2. #2,162Zachary14
  3. #2,162Zygmunt14
  4. #2,270Fern13
  5. #2,270Abbie13
  6. #2,270Alberta13
  7. #2,270Almer13
  8. #2,387Abran12
  9. #2,387Addie12
  10. #2,387Adolphe12

Tied with 116 names at #2,270; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1927
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,009Fidencio#1,959 → #950
  2. ↑ 766Hoover#1,128 → #362
  3. ↑ 700Reyes#1,692 → #992
  4. ↑ 441Arlen#1,227 → #786
  5. ↑ 392Arland#1,372 → #980
Fallers
  1. ↓ 2,975Shoji#722 → #3,697
  2. ↓ 529Alvan#951 → #1,480
  3. ↓ 418Watson#964 → #1,382
  4. ↓ 412Judge#911 → #1,323
  5. ↓ 363Donato#990 → #1,353

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1928 →