Fern

#1,219 for girls in 2025, 186 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #5,659
Given to girls 98.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1916 · 1,332 births
Debut · girls
10 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
37,666
since 1880

Fern over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Fern has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201933peak #152, 1916girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,219186—
2024#1,250186#5,65916
2023#1,421157—
2022#1,478148#12,3305
2021#1,498141—
2020#1,559135—
2019#1,864108—
2018#1,656127—
2017#2,20086—
2016#2,20687—
2015#2,19486—
2014#2,68365—
2013#3,40446—
2012#3,52345—
2011#4,24434—
2010#4,39733—
2009#5,37826—
2008#5,27927—
2007#10,81810—
2006#7,48216—
2005#6,52818—
2004#6,21619—
2003#7,99813—
2002#8,83711—
2001#10,1029—
2000#5,93718—
1999#7,23913—
1998#8,58410—
1997#7,74211—
1996#11,8076—
1995#6,64113—
1994#6,67213—
1993#9,5598—
1992#13,3175—
1991#8,5889—
1990#8,5019—
1989#5,54515—
1988#4,49619—
1987#7,9878—
1986#10,9125—
1985#5,34813—
1984#3,72621—
1983#4,28617—
1982#2,90131—
1981#3,06628—
1980#4,32717—
1979#2,99728—
1978#4,24216—
1977#3,61220—
1976#3,96316—
1975#3,15522—
1974#2,83525—
1973#2,30933—
1972#2,35631—
1971#2,03541—
1970#1,49067#4,7245
1969#1,72849—
1968#1,51956—
1967#1,29970—
1966#1,28471—
1965#1,16884—
1964#1,060105—
1963#1,022109#4,0485
1962#1,12194—
1961#821164—
1960#755183—
1959#702204—
1958#748177—
1957#731187—
1956#629232—
1955#633216—
1954#585237—
1953#543256#2,9058
1952#577226#3,7345
1951#527250—
1950#547228#2,7708
1949#538238#3,6905
1948#528245—
1947#520255—
1946#464284—
1945#442260#2,5748
1944#427281—
1943#423300—
1942#407311#2,9407
1941#396301#3,5055
1940#359328#3,4595
1939#359327—
1938#323377#3,1756
1937#326366#2,33210
1936#303395#2,6298
1935#289429#2,9517
1934#285462#2,7428
1933#275507#1,82915
1932#277503#3,3616
1931#255571#2,20712
1930#246633#3,0228
1929#231679#2,19913
1928#221806#2,27013
1927#219845#1,87118
1926#209912#3,1398
1925#203976#2,08915
1924#1971,059#2,04316
1923#1871,169#1,87418
1922#1821,207#1,95217
1921#1741,297#1,70321
1920#1701,304#1,69421
1919#1761,181#1,97316
1918#1641,341#2,07315
1917#1621,261#1,90016
1916#1521,332#1,77117
1915#1571,175#1,30626
1914#172821#1,68714
1913#166697#1,67611
1912#167613#2,0457
1911#172435#1,3877
1910#174394#1,3147
1909#173345#1,0838
1908#166364—
1907#193276—
1906#181277#1,2535
1905#183273#1,2335
1904#173281—
1903#176276#69611
1902#190238#1,0136
1901#191217—
1900#193266—
1899#182232—
1898#174265—
1897#178237#7878
1896#186218—
1895#199184—
1894#188197#8577
1893#185189#1,0355
1892#192172—
1891#214124—
1890#224119—
1889#230103#9745
1888#26277—
1887#25269—
1886#35636#8456
1885#30344—
1884#30440#9715
1883#43519—
1882#34826—
1881#53910—
1880#54710—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Fern was already there! It came in at #547, and was given to 10 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1986, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Fern is popular in 1933

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedAKMaine: #134 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 658 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedWAIdaho: #103 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 396 girlsIDMontana: #139 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 665 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #116 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 455 girlsNDMinnesota: #115 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 573 girlsMNIllinois: #193 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 1,415 girlsILWisconsin: #134 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 825 girlsWIMichigan: #247 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 2,173 girlsMINew York: #298 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 3,307 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #123 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 515 girlsSDIowa: #138 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 718 girlsIAIndiana: #293 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,065 girlsINOhio: #230 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 2,046 girlsOHPennsylvania: #195 for girls · 45 births · 1 in 1,525 girlsPANew Jersey: #328 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,824 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #313 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,530 girlsCAUtah: #173 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 733 girlsUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedCONebraska: #117 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 575 girlsNEMissouri: #152 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 749 girlsMOKentucky: #242 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,528 girlsKYWest Virginia: #234 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,495 girlsWVVirginia: #286 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,514 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedDEArizona: #182 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 693 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNMKansas: #168 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 917 girlsKSArkansas: #192 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 833 girlsARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #182 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 875 girlsOKLouisiana: #434 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,816 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedHITexas: #424 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 2,869 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Idaho#103 · 1 in 396
  2. Minnesota#115 · 1 in 573
  3. North Dakota#116 · 1 in 455
  4. Nebraska#117 · 1 in 575
  5. South Dakota#123 · 1 in 515

Best ever in a state: #19 in Utah, 1912.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Idaho#10381 in 396
Minnesota#115321 in 573
North Dakota#116121 in 455
Nebraska#117171 in 575
South Dakota#123101 in 515
Maine#13491 in 658
Wisconsin#134261 in 825
Iowa#138241 in 718
Montana#13951 in 665
Missouri#152351 in 749
Kansas#168141 in 917
Utah#17361 in 733
Arizona#18251 in 693
Oklahoma#182251 in 875
Arkansas#192221 in 833
Illinois#193341 in 1,415
Pennsylvania#195451 in 1,525
Ohio#230211 in 2,046
West Virginia#234111 in 1,495
Kentucky#242171 in 1,528
Michigan#247161 in 2,173
Virginia#28691 in 2,514
Indiana#29371 in 3,065
New York#298251 in 3,307
California#313131 in 2,530
New Jersey#32851 in 4,824
Texas#424191 in 2,869
Louisiana#43451 in 3,816
Alabama———
Alaska———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Mississippi———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
Tennessee———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Fern
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 31 spots since 2024 (#1,250 → #1,219)
  • 340 spots since 2020 (#1,559 → #1,219)
  • 975 spots since 2015 (#2,194 → #1,219)
  • Biggest jump: 191 spots in 1882 (#539 → #348)
  • Biggest drop: 300 spots in 1962 (#821 → #1,121)
Rise & fade · girls
36 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1916 at #152 (1,332 births)
  • Births halved by 1930, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 82 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 82 yrs · run 1880–1961
Share of babies · girls
1 in 784
  • Highest: 1 in 784 girls born in 1916 were named Fern (0.13%)
  • Latest: 1 in 8,641 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 27.2% of all girls named Fern (10,254) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s434#230 (1889)#358
1890s1,937#174 (1898)#192
1900s2,813#166 (1908)#182
1910s9,250#152 (1916)#166
1920s10,254#170 (1920)#199
1930s4,570#246 (1930)#294
1940s2,803#359 (1940)#450
1950s2,213#527 (1951)#622
1960s985#755 (1960)#1,178
1970s299#1,490 (1970)#2,899
1980s174#2,901 (1982)#5,259
1990s97#6,641 (1995)#8,865
2000s167#5,279 (2008)#7,458
2010s717#1,656 (2018)#2,837
2020s953#1,219 (2025)#1,404

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Fern in 1933

girls
#275
507 births · 1 in 1,988 girls
boys
#1,829
15 births · 1 in 66,102 boys

Top girls' names in 1933

  1. #1Mary55,517
  2. #2Betty31,531
  3. #3Barbara26,949
  4. #4Dorothy22,054
  5. #5Joan19,294
  6. #6Patricia18,632
  7. #7Margaret15,241
  8. #8Helen14,644
  9. #9Shirley14,320
  10. #10Doris12,025
  11. #275Fern507

Top boys' names in 1933

  1. #1Robert54,221
  2. #2James51,112
  3. #3John46,224
  4. #4William39,049
  5. #5Richard31,331
  6. #6Charles28,991
  7. #7Donald28,450
  8. #8George18,356
  9. #9Joseph17,162
  10. #10Thomas16,508
  11. #1,829Fern15
More about 1933

girls

1,007,932 girls got a published name in 1933; 1 in 1,988 of them was named Fern, which outranked 94.3% of the 4,858 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Fern
  1. #271Olga512
  2. #273Lela510
  3. #274Jewel509
  4. #275Fern507
  5. #276Glenna504
  6. #277Nelda476
  7. #278Jewell467
Biggest movers since 1932
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,022Rheta#1,754 → #732
  2. ↑ 930Joellen#1,877 → #947
  3. ↑ 583Veola#1,568 → #985
  4. ↑ 483Sharlene#1,162 → #679
  5. ↑ 475Louetta#1,448 → #973
Fallers
  1. ↓ 395Golda#969 → #1,364
  2. ↓ 322Louis#940 → #1,262
  3. ↓ 298Bebe#899 → #1,197
  4. ↓ 291Clyde#998 → #1,289
  5. ↓ 291Mariam#998 → #1,289

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

991,524 boys got a published name in 1933; 1 in 66,102 of them was named Fern, which outranked 56.0% of the 4,156 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Fern
  1. #1,770Tyree16
  2. #1,770Vernice16
  3. #1,770Virgie16
  4. #1,829Fern15
  5. #1,829Abie15
  6. #1,829Agapito15
  7. #1,829Alphonzo15
  8. #1,905Addie14
  9. #1,905Adron14
  10. #1,905Agnes14

Tied with 75 names at #1,829; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1932
Risers
  1. ↑ 553Neville#1,548 → #995
  2. ↑ 401Cordell#1,286 → #885
  3. ↑ 381Hamilton#1,286 → #905
  4. ↑ 375Delano#677 → #302
  5. ↑ 313Jan#937 → #624
Fallers
  1. ↓ 568Hoover#793 → #1,361
  2. ↓ 541Porfirio#915 → #1,456
  3. ↓ 424Rosendo#937 → #1,361
  4. ↓ 381Alfonzo#821 → #1,202
  5. ↓ 368Hillard#862 → #1,230

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1933 →