Fern

#1,219 for girls in 2025, 186 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #5,659
Given to girls 98.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1916 · 1,332 births
Debut · girls
10 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
37,666
since 1880

Fern over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Fern has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201943peak #152, 1916girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,219186—
2024#1,250186#5,65916
2023#1,421157—
2022#1,478148#12,3305
2021#1,498141—
2020#1,559135—
2019#1,864108—
2018#1,656127—
2017#2,20086—
2016#2,20687—
2015#2,19486—
2014#2,68365—
2013#3,40446—
2012#3,52345—
2011#4,24434—
2010#4,39733—
2009#5,37826—
2008#5,27927—
2007#10,81810—
2006#7,48216—
2005#6,52818—
2004#6,21619—
2003#7,99813—
2002#8,83711—
2001#10,1029—
2000#5,93718—
1999#7,23913—
1998#8,58410—
1997#7,74211—
1996#11,8076—
1995#6,64113—
1994#6,67213—
1993#9,5598—
1992#13,3175—
1991#8,5889—
1990#8,5019—
1989#5,54515—
1988#4,49619—
1987#7,9878—
1986#10,9125—
1985#5,34813—
1984#3,72621—
1983#4,28617—
1982#2,90131—
1981#3,06628—
1980#4,32717—
1979#2,99728—
1978#4,24216—
1977#3,61220—
1976#3,96316—
1975#3,15522—
1974#2,83525—
1973#2,30933—
1972#2,35631—
1971#2,03541—
1970#1,49067#4,7245
1969#1,72849—
1968#1,51956—
1967#1,29970—
1966#1,28471—
1965#1,16884—
1964#1,060105—
1963#1,022109#4,0485
1962#1,12194—
1961#821164—
1960#755183—
1959#702204—
1958#748177—
1957#731187—
1956#629232—
1955#633216—
1954#585237—
1953#543256#2,9058
1952#577226#3,7345
1951#527250—
1950#547228#2,7708
1949#538238#3,6905
1948#528245—
1947#520255—
1946#464284—
1945#442260#2,5748
1944#427281—
1943#423300—
1942#407311#2,9407
1941#396301#3,5055
1940#359328#3,4595
1939#359327—
1938#323377#3,1756
1937#326366#2,33210
1936#303395#2,6298
1935#289429#2,9517
1934#285462#2,7428
1933#275507#1,82915
1932#277503#3,3616
1931#255571#2,20712
1930#246633#3,0228
1929#231679#2,19913
1928#221806#2,27013
1927#219845#1,87118
1926#209912#3,1398
1925#203976#2,08915
1924#1971,059#2,04316
1923#1871,169#1,87418
1922#1821,207#1,95217
1921#1741,297#1,70321
1920#1701,304#1,69421
1919#1761,181#1,97316
1918#1641,341#2,07315
1917#1621,261#1,90016
1916#1521,332#1,77117
1915#1571,175#1,30626
1914#172821#1,68714
1913#166697#1,67611
1912#167613#2,0457
1911#172435#1,3877
1910#174394#1,3147
1909#173345#1,0838
1908#166364—
1907#193276—
1906#181277#1,2535
1905#183273#1,2335
1904#173281—
1903#176276#69611
1902#190238#1,0136
1901#191217—
1900#193266—
1899#182232—
1898#174265—
1897#178237#7878
1896#186218—
1895#199184—
1894#188197#8577
1893#185189#1,0355
1892#192172—
1891#214124—
1890#224119—
1889#230103#9745
1888#26277—
1887#25269—
1886#35636#8456
1885#30344—
1884#30440#9715
1883#43519—
1882#34826—
1881#53910—
1880#54710—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Fern was already there! It came in at #547, and was given to 10 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1986, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Fern is popular in 1943

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNHWashington: #333 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,093 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedIDMontana: #154 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 711 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #131 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 651 girlsNDMinnesota: #274 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,794 girlsMNIllinois: #320 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 3,505 girlsILWisconsin: #373 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,648 girlsWIMichigan: #341 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 4,335 girlsMINew York: #345 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 3,947 girlsNYMassachusetts: #397 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,764 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedSDIowa: #225 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,074 girlsIAIndiana: #374 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,648 girlsINOhio: #448 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 7,215 girlsOHPennsylvania: #260 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 2,576 girlsPANew Jersey: #307 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,616 girlsNJConnecticut: #289 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,270 girlsCTCalifornia: #446 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 4,874 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNEMissouri: #244 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,936 girlsMOKentucky: #301 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,633 girlsKYWest Virginia: #365 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,895 girlsWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedKSArkansas: #345 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,598 girlsARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #356 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,050 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedHITexas: #625 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 6,758 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Fern, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Dakota#131 · 1 in 651
  2. Montana#154 · 1 in 711
  3. Iowa#225 · 1 in 2,074
  4. Missouri#244 · 1 in 1,936
  5. Pennsylvania#260 · 1 in 2,576

Best ever in a state: #19 in Utah, 1912.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Dakota#13181 in 651
Montana#15461 in 711
Iowa#225101 in 2,074
Missouri#244171 in 1,936
Pennsylvania#260351 in 2,576
Minnesota#27491 in 2,794
Connecticut#28951 in 3,270
Kentucky#301111 in 2,633
New Jersey#307101 in 3,616
Illinois#320201 in 3,505
Washington#33361 in 3,093
Michigan#341131 in 4,335
Arkansas#34581 in 2,598
New York#345291 in 3,947
Oklahoma#35671 in 3,050
West Virginia#36551 in 3,895
Wisconsin#37351 in 5,648
Indiana#37471 in 4,648
Massachusetts#39751 in 7,764
California#446161 in 4,874
Ohio#44891 in 7,215
Texas#625111 in 6,758
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Mississippi———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Fern
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 31 spots since 2024 (#1,250 → #1,219)
  • 340 spots since 2020 (#1,559 → #1,219)
  • 975 spots since 2015 (#2,194 → #1,219)
  • Biggest jump: 191 spots in 1882 (#539 → #348)
  • Biggest drop: 300 spots in 1962 (#821 → #1,121)
Rise & fade · girls
36 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1916 at #152 (1,332 births)
  • Births halved by 1930, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 82 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 82 yrs · run 1880–1961
Share of babies · girls
1 in 784
  • Highest: 1 in 784 girls born in 1916 were named Fern (0.13%)
  • Latest: 1 in 8,641 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 27.2% of all girls named Fern (10,254) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s434#230 (1889)#358
1890s1,937#174 (1898)#192
1900s2,813#166 (1908)#182
1910s9,250#152 (1916)#166
1920s10,254#170 (1920)#199
1930s4,570#246 (1930)#294
1940s2,803#359 (1940)#450
1950s2,213#527 (1951)#622
1960s985#755 (1960)#1,178
1970s299#1,490 (1970)#2,899
1980s174#2,901 (1982)#5,259
1990s97#6,641 (1995)#8,865
2000s167#5,279 (2008)#7,458
2010s717#1,656 (2018)#2,837
2020s953#1,219 (2025)#1,404

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Fern in 1943

girls
#423
300 births · 1 in 4,651 girls

Top girls' names in 1943

  1. #1Mary66,174
  2. #2Barbara43,432
  3. #3Patricia39,620
  4. #4Linda38,439
  5. #5Carol31,686
  6. #6Sandra25,990
  7. #7Judith25,214
  8. #8Sharon24,712
  9. #9Nancy23,988
  10. #10Betty21,596
  11. #423Fern300
More about 1943

girls

1,395,293 girls got a published name in 1943; 1 in 4,651 of them was named Fern, which outranked 92.1% of the 5,367 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Fern
  1. #420Delia306
  2. #420Rhoda306
  3. #422Margarita302
  4. #423Fern300
  5. #423Corinne300
  6. #425Laurel299
  7. #425Monica299
  8. #427Elva298

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1942
Risers
  1. ↑ 878Tana#1,559 → #681
  2. ↑ 754Rozanne#1,706 → #952
  3. ↑ 722Cheryle#1,592 → #870
  4. ↑ 596Tena#1,592 → #996
  5. ↑ 525Alexis#1,349 → #824
Fallers
  1. ↓ 594Florida#997 → #1,591
  2. ↓ 467Jerilynn#581 → #1,048
  3. ↓ 364Lorelei#864 → #1,228
  4. ↓ 308Kaaren#536 → #844
  5. ↓ 305Erna#864 → #1,169

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1943 →