Forest

#8,362 for girls in 2025, 12 births · #750 for boys in 2025, 344 births
Given to boys 96.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1893 · 59 births
Debut · boys
30 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
17,784
since 1880

Forest over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Forest has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201931peak #222, 1893boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#8,36212#750344
2024#6,16719#720365
2023#5,39023#746350
2022#6,98416#703375
2021#8,02413#718361
2020#7,21215#796291
2019#6,69817#905243
2018#11,4278#979212
2017#9,34111#1,007201
2016#14,3316#1,102178
2015#16,4195#1,307135
2014—#1,321132
2013—#1,537104
2012—#1,89176
2011—#1,73884
2010—#1,77883
2009—#2,05067
2008—#1,83879
2007—#2,01669
2006—#2,54247
2005—#2,00862
2004—#2,13155
2003—#1,74969
2002—#1,72367
2001—#1,87159
2000—#1,47983
1999—#1,44980
1998—#1,133110
1997—#1,161105
1996#9,5818#1,060115
1995#7,51411#749205
1994#3,89227#655252
1993#7,03812#719207
1992#8,7349#814165
1991#8,5889#920131
1990—#1,08397
1989—#1,10292
1988—#1,09982
1987—#1,02386
1986—#1,04180
1985—#1,41648
1984#9,1446#1,06970
1983—#1,04971
1982#10,5175#1,07272
1981#10,4115#99583
1980#9,0956#878103
1979—#99180
1978#7,6497#1,05768
1977—#91386
1976#8,1566#92981
1975#7,1737#93876
1974#8,7755#85687
1973—#1,07457
1972—#1,00764
1971—#87387
1970—#94072
1969—#1,09750
1968—#82978
1967—#93160
1966—#84574
1965—#79687
1964—#83982
1963#6,5925#82584
1962—#80888
1961—#82586
1960—#80490
1959—#80191
1958—#712112
1957#6,0865#722107
1956—#76293
1955—#715104
1954—#714103
1953—#678112
1952—#70998
1951#4,0118#693102
1950—#648115
1949—#580134
1948—#655108
1947—#528164
1946—#642100
1945#4,5565#577111
1944#4,5745#513139
1943—#559128
1942#4,6225#543127
1941—#491141
1940—#521124
1939—#506125
1938—#551110
1937—#472143
1936—#518119
1935#4,2045#505129
1934#2,56711#490137
1933—#415171
1932—#458155
1931—#400198
1930—#408206
1929#4,0536#390222
1928#2,38114#376242
1927#2,69912#395229
1926#3,8737#382235
1925#2,93911#376251
1924—#366269
1923#4,3766#362270
1922#2,78012#339299
1921#2,94111#380253
1920#3,3409#341292
1919#2,38414#326296
1918#2,37614#319316
1917#2,42813#319286
1916#2,65811#299300
1915#2,68810#333252
1914#2,26510#299228
1913#1,88311#300176
1912—#342121
1911#1,54510#28685
1910#2,3985#30465
1909—#33947
1908—#31050
1907#1,8216#26961
1906—#26058
1905#1,9315#26456
1904#1,6596#23465
1903#1,7925#26947
1902—#23859
1901—#25545
1900—#28453
1899#1,5965#28138
1898#1,5026#22362
1897#82615#24450
1896#1,2138#25550
1895—#24952
1894#1,4855#30832
1893#1,2776#22259
1892#1,4505#25349
1891#1,0068#24841
1890#87210#28237
1889—#36024
1888—#29736
1887—#31128
1886—#25644
1885—#30730
1884—#30133
1883—#30928
1882—#33227
1881—#39518
1880—#30530
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Forest was already there! It came in at #305, and was given to 30 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1881–1882, when fewer than 28 boys a year got the name.

Where Forest is popular in 1931

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedMNIllinois: #370 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 6,739 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedWIMichigan: #261 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 3,245 boysMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedIAIndiana: #217 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 2,385 boysINOhio: #221 for boys · 18 births · 1 in 2,666 boysOHPennsylvania: #376 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 8,496 boysPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #436 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 6,062 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedNEMissouri: #235 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 2,263 boysMOKentucky: #227 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 1,767 boysKYWest Virginia: #192 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 1,350 boysWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedKSArkansas: #310 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 2,732 boysARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #247 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 2,108 boysNCSouth Carolina: #320 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 3,284 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedALGeorgia: #385 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 4,551 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedHITexas: #470 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 4,247 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Forest, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. West Virginia#192 · 1 in 1,350
  2. Indiana#217 · 1 in 2,385
  3. Ohio#221 · 1 in 2,666
  4. Kentucky#227 · 1 in 1,767
  5. Missouri#235 · 1 in 2,263

Best ever in a state: #81 in West Virginia, 1910.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
West Virginia#192121 in 1,350
Indiana#217101 in 2,385
Ohio#221181 in 2,666
Kentucky#227141 in 1,767
Missouri#235121 in 2,263
North Carolina#247151 in 2,108
Michigan#261121 in 3,245
Arkansas#31061 in 2,732
South Carolina#32051 in 3,284
Illinois#37081 in 6,739
Pennsylvania#37691 in 8,496
Georgia#38561 in 4,551
California#43661 in 6,062
Texas#470131 in 4,247
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Forest
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 30 spots since 2024 (#720 → #750)
  • 46 spots since 2020 (#796 → #750)
  • 557 spots since 2015 (#1,307 → #750)
  • Biggest jump: 218 spots in 1974 (#1,074 → #856)
  • Biggest drop: 311 spots in 1996 (#749 → #1,060)
Rise & fade · boys
13 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1893 at #222 (59 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 111 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 111 yrs · run 1880–1968
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,904
  • Highest: 1 in 1,904 boys born in 1893 were named Forest (0.05%)
  • Latest: 1 in 4,965 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 14.4% of all boys named Forest (2,562) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s298#256 (1886)#317
1890s470#222 (1893)#257
1900s541#234 (1904)#272
1910s2,125#286 (1911)#313
1920s2,562#339 (1922)#371
1930s1,493#400 (1931)#472
1940s1,276#491 (1941)#561
1950s1,037#648 (1950)#715
1960s779#796 (1965)#860
1970s758#856 (1974)#958
1980s787#878 (1980)#1,074
1990s1,467#655 (1994)#974
2000s657#1,479 (2000)#1,941
2010s1,448#905 (2019)#1,357
2020s2,086#703 (2022)#739

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Forest in 1931

boys
#400
198 births · 1 in 5,251 boys

Top boys' names in 1931

  1. #1Robert60,519
  2. #2James51,212
  3. #3John48,423
  4. #4William43,280
  5. #5Richard31,822
  6. #6Charles29,934
  7. #7Donald29,100
  8. #8George20,685
  9. #9Joseph19,326
  10. #10Thomas16,847
  11. #400Forest198
More about 1931

boys

1,039,665 boys got a published name in 1931; 1 in 5,251 of them was named Forest, which outranked 90.7% of the 4,321 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Forest
  1. #396Coy201
  2. #396Vern201
  3. #399Buford200
  4. #400Forest198
  5. #400Elijah198
  6. #400Emanuel198
  7. #403Truman197
  8. #404Lorenzo193
  9. #404Sterling193

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1930
Risers
  1. ↑ 794Kenton#1,753 → #959
  2. ↑ 420Wyman#1,330 → #910
  3. ↑ 408Jan#1,330 → #922
  4. ↑ 402Leopold#1,399 → #997
  5. ↑ 398Odie#1,299 → #901
Fallers
  1. ↓ 513Artie#976 → #1,489
  2. ↓ 469Arnulfo#892 → #1,361
  3. ↓ 385Rose#832 → #1,217
  4. ↓ 357Ransom#976 → #1,333
  5. ↓ 343Jodie#990 → #1,333

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1931 →