Foster

#7,491 for girls in 2025, 14 births · #901 for boys in 2025, 264 births
Given to boys 97.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1894 · 40 births
Debut · boys
16 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
13,122
since 1880

Foster over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Foster has never cracked the top 200 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201920peak #278, 1894boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#7,49114#901264
2024#5,79921#1,076202
2023#5,12625#966232
2022#6,98416#1,037213
2021#6,69117#1,006217
2020#5,66721#961226
2019#7,34215#945227
2018#8,61712#1,077184
2017#7,09216#936223
2016#9,41111#963214
2015#10,14810#1,032196
2014#9,51711#991209
2013#11,0009#937213
2012#16,8695#993200
2011—#1,544102
2010#16,9925#1,349126
2009—#1,443116
2008#17,5045#1,73687
2007—#1,65093
2006#9,90111#1,51999
2005—#1,61984
2004#16,0995#1,328111
2003—#1,40095
2002—#1,268107
2001—#1,38791
2000#11,8017#1,31498
1999—#1,158113
1998#11,1387#1,172106
1997#10,8367#1,116113
1996—#1,33481
1995#13,3865#1,081109
1994—#1,19293
1993#13,4425#1,32174
1992—#1,52558
1991—#1,61552
1990—#1,63550
1989—#1,85840
1988—#1,70641
1987—#1,65541
1986—#2,09627
1985—#1,52443
1984—#1,76432
1983—#1,65135
1982—#1,65436
1981—#1,66135
1980—#1,80831
1979—#1,46441
1978—#1,65233
1977—#1,33546
1976—#1,46937
1975—#1,34542
1974—#1,69228
1973—#1,43535
1972—#1,68027
1971—#1,63729
1970—#1,29741
1969—#1,60526
1968—#1,11945
1967—#1,16541
1966—#1,29934
1965—#1,06448
1964—#1,02554
1963—#1,19542
1962—#1,00758
1961—#88275
1960—#1,05853
1959—#91969
1958—#92867
1957—#88473
1956—#80486
1955—#86273
1954—#93962
1953—#83973
1952—#78181
1951—#76683
1950—#72190
1949—#664107
1948—#626117
1947—#615122
1946—#68988
1945—#586106
1944—#594107
1943—#581119
1942#4,6225#575116
1941—#62893
1940—#62690
1939—#63686
1938—#559108
1937—#570102
1936—#62886
1935—#534117
1934—#560111
1933—#577100
1932—#59299
1931—#557111
1930—#546121
1929—#543117
1928—#588110
1927—#485155
1926—#465167
1925#4,9735#481159
1924—#472171
1923#4,9675#461176
1922#4,4456#442189
1921—#431199
1920—#418201
1919—#429188
1918—#406212
1917—#426177
1916—#387204
1915—#419166
1914#3,6185#404138
1913—#381122
1912—#39196
1911—#35361
1910—#41542
1909—#40836
1908—#35541
1907—#42929
1906—#32141
1905—#37031
1904—#30042
1903—#36028
1902—#36030
1901—#29136
1900—#41929
1899—#29435
1898—#31637
1897—#29937
1896—#27943
1895—#35827
1894—#27840
1893—#28736
1892—#28441
1891—#29132
1890—#36923
1889—#33827
1888—#35926
1887—#40917
1886—#36922
1885—#34425
1884—#39920
1883—#28932
1882—#29434
1881—#34822
1880—#44216
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Foster was already there! It came in at #442, and was given to 16 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 23 boys a year got the name.

Where Foster is popular in 1920

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedMNIllinois: #499 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 10,678 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedMINew York: #439 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 10,046 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedINOhio: #274 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 3,519 boysOHPennsylvania: #349 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 6,528 boysPANew Jersey: #228 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 3,635 boysNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedNEMissouri: #313 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 3,096 boysMOKentucky: #226 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 1,779 boysKYWest Virginia: #238 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 1,901 boysWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedARTennessee: #435 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 4,703 boysTNNorth Carolina: #395 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,104 boysNCSouth Carolina: #194 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 1,415 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #354 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,105 boysOKLouisiana: #336 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 2,668 boysLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedMSAlabama: #240 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 1,829 boysALGeorgia: #308 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 2,913 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedHITexas: #636 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 6,350 boysTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Foster, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. South Carolina#194 · 1 in 1,415
  2. Kentucky#226 · 1 in 1,779
  3. New Jersey#228 · 1 in 3,635
  4. West Virginia#238 · 1 in 1,901
  5. Alabama#240 · 1 in 1,829

Best ever in a state: #132 in West Virginia, 1921.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Carolina#194151 in 1,415
Kentucky#226141 in 1,779
New Jersey#22881 in 3,635
West Virginia#23881 in 1,901
Alabama#240141 in 1,829
Ohio#274141 in 3,519
Georgia#308111 in 2,913
Missouri#31391 in 3,096
Louisiana#33671 in 2,668
Pennsylvania#349131 in 6,528
Oklahoma#35471 in 3,105
North Carolina#39581 in 4,104
Tennessee#43551 in 4,703
New York#43991 in 10,046
Illinois#49951 in 10,678
Texas#63681 in 6,350
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Foster
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 175 spots since 2024 (#1,076 → #901)
  • 60 spots since 2020 (#961 → #901)
  • 131 spots since 2015 (#1,032 → #901)
  • Biggest jump: 551 spots in 2012 (#1,544 → #993)
  • Biggest drop: 141 spots in 2018 (#936 → #1,077)
Rise & fade · boys
14 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1894 at #278 (40 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 90 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 90 yrs · run 1880–1959
Share of babies · boys
1 in 2,781
  • Highest: 1 in 2,781 boys born in 1896 were named Foster (0.04%)
  • Latest: 1 in 6,470 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
  • Its best rank, #278 in 1894, was only 1 in 2,894 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 14.4% of all boys named Foster (1,894) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s241#289 (1883)#359
1890s351#278 (1894)#306
1900s343#291 (1901)#361
1910s1,406#353 (1911)#401
1920s1,644#418 (1920)#479
1930s1,041#534 (1935)#576
1940s1,065#575 (1942)#618
1950s757#721 (1950)#844
1960s476#882 (1961)#1,142
1970s359#1,297 (1970)#1,501
1980s361#1,524 (1985)#1,738
1990s849#1,081 (1995)#1,315
2000s981#1,268 (2002)#1,466
2010s1,894#936 (2017)#1,077
2020s1,354#901 (2025)#991

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Foster in 1920

boys
#418
201 births · 1 in 5,295 boys

Top boys' names in 1920

  1. #1John56,913
  2. #2William50,146
  3. #3Robert48,679
  4. #4James47,908
  5. #5Charles28,309
  6. #6George26,891
  7. #7Joseph25,587
  8. #8Edward20,097
  9. #9Frank16,430
  10. #10Richard15,010
  11. #418Foster201
More about 1920

boys

1,064,356 boys got a published name in 1920; 1 in 5,295 of them was named Foster, which outranked 91.6% of the 4,989 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Foster
  1. #413Saul206
  2. #416Pat204
  3. #417Salvador202
  4. #418Foster201
  5. #418Freeman201
  6. #418Gabriel201
  7. #418Lenard201
  8. #422Bertram200
  9. #422Royal200
  10. #422Sheldon200

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1919
Risers
  1. ↑ 960Harding#1,351 → #391
  2. ↑ 607Cameron#1,351 → #744
  3. ↑ 566Hardin#1,531 → #965
  4. ↑ 392Laurel#1,321 → #929
  5. ↑ 368Terrence#1,297 → #929
Fallers
  1. ↓ 789Pershing#593 → #1,382
  2. ↓ 580Woodroe#877 → #1,457
  3. ↓ 385Quinten#867 → #1,252
  4. ↓ 383Orvel#890 → #1,273
  5. ↓ 373Rexford#927 → #1,300

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1920 →