Fredrick
Last seen for girls in 1988 at #11,798 · #1,728 for boys in 2025, 94 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 103 births
- Debut · boys
- 103 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 64,527since 1880
Fredrick over time
Rank among boys' names. Fredrick has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,728 | 94 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,631 | 104 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,591 | 109 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,393 | 133 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,407 | 130 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,423 | 121 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,450 | 120 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,408 | 124 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,219 | 150 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,389 | 126 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,216 | 151 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,264 | 141 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,149 | 157 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,346 | 126 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,240 | 140 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,133 | 164 | |
| 2009 | — | #998 | 197 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,111 | 165 | |
| 2007 | — | #925 | 214 | |
| 2006 | — | #896 | 217 | |
| 2005 | — | #919 | 191 | |
| 2004 | — | #795 | 227 | |
| 2003 | — | #826 | 212 | |
| 2002 | — | #832 | 200 | |
| 2001 | — | #766 | 224 | |
| 2000 | — | #718 | 242 | |
| 1999 | — | #681 | 248 | |
| 1998 | — | #621 | 295 | |
| 1997 | — | #624 | 276 | |
| 1996 | — | #584 | 308 | |
| 1995 | — | #539 | 354 | |
| 1994 | — | #582 | 317 | |
| 1993 | — | #545 | 354 | |
| 1992 | — | #506 | 398 | |
| 1991 | — | #489 | 413 | |
| 1990 | — | #468 | 446 | |
| 1989 | — | #451 | 434 | |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | #477 | 373 |
| 1987 | — | #453 | 385 | |
| 1986 | — | #429 | 405 | |
| 1985 | — | #363 | 505 | |
| 1984 | — | #374 | 471 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #358 | 494 |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #331 | 577 |
| 1981 | #8,128 | 7 | #321 | 595 |
| 1980 | #6,789 | 9 | #310 | 621 |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | #304 | 648 |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | #287 | 669 |
| 1977 | — | #295 | 660 | |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 | #294 | 634 |
| 1975 | #5,516 | 10 | #268 | 720 |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | #263 | 729 |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | #254 | 774 |
| 1972 | #3,714 | 16 | #227 | 944 |
| 1971 | #4,123 | 14 | #232 | 1,022 |
| 1970 | #5,818 | 8 | #247 | 942 |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | #265 | 786 |
| 1968 | #4,779 | 9 | #250 | 821 |
| 1967 | #3,845 | 12 | #256 | 787 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #248 | 843 |
| 1965 | #4,494 | 9 | #258 | 819 |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | #260 | 870 |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #268 | 812 |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | #267 | 817 |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #262 | 898 |
| 1960 | — | #263 | 905 | |
| 1959 | #5,566 | 6 | #263 | 922 |
| 1958 | #4,890 | 7 | #252 | 958 |
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | #236 | 1,047 |
| 1956 | — | #216 | 1,136 | |
| 1955 | — | #209 | 1,169 | |
| 1954 | #3,325 | 12 | #201 | 1,235 |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | #189 | 1,341 |
| 1952 | — | #192 | 1,211 | |
| 1951 | — | #194 | 1,166 | |
| 1950 | #4,738 | 6 | #190 | 1,162 |
| 1949 | — | #199 | 1,032 | |
| 1948 | — | #207 | 939 | |
| 1947 | — | #211 | 917 | |
| 1946 | — | #203 | 845 | |
| 1945 | — | #204 | 707 | |
| 1944 | — | #203 | 736 | |
| 1943 | #3,493 | 8 | #202 | 796 |
| 1942 | — | #199 | 789 | |
| 1941 | — | #197 | 729 | |
| 1940 | — | #191 | 742 | |
| 1939 | — | #198 | 629 | |
| 1938 | — | #194 | 664 | |
| 1937 | — | #202 | 602 | |
| 1936 | — | #198 | 626 | |
| 1935 | — | #220 | 545 | |
| 1934 | — | #254 | 456 | |
| 1933 | — | #224 | 516 | |
| 1932 | #3,901 | 6 | #242 | 487 |
| 1931 | — | #233 | 502 | |
| 1930 | — | #230 | 548 | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #244 | 505 |
| 1928 | — | #235 | 548 | |
| 1927 | — | #234 | 563 | |
| 1926 | — | #218 | 625 | |
| 1925 | — | #240 | 549 | |
| 1924 | — | #231 | 585 | |
| 1923 | — | #223 | 587 | |
| 1922 | — | #244 | 539 | |
| 1921 | — | #229 | 582 | |
| 1920 | — | #226 | 558 | |
| 1919 | — | #244 | 467 | |
| 1918 | — | #238 | 503 | |
| 1917 | — | #229 | 471 | |
| 1916 | — | #241 | 437 | |
| 1915 | — | #232 | 426 | |
| 1914 | — | #228 | 345 | |
| 1913 | — | #244 | 241 | |
| 1912 | — | #255 | 193 | |
| 1911 | — | #266 | 95 | |
| 1910 | — | #296 | 70 | |
| 1909 | — | #307 | 56 | |
| 1908 | — | #261 | 66 | |
| 1907 | — | #277 | 57 | |
| 1906 | — | #293 | 48 | |
| 1905 | — | #281 | 49 | |
| 1904 | — | #294 | 43 | |
| 1903 | — | #234 | 59 | |
| 1902 | — | #291 | 42 | |
| 1901 | — | #245 | 49 | |
| 1900 | — | #250 | 67 | |
| 1899 | — | #254 | 43 | |
| 1898 | — | #206 | 72 | |
| 1897 | — | #209 | 65 | |
| 1896 | — | #260 | 48 | |
| 1895 | — | #220 | 62 | |
| 1894 | — | #240 | 50 | |
| 1893 | — | #197 | 73 | |
| 1892 | — | #210 | 69 | |
| 1891 | — | #214 | 55 | |
| 1890 | — | #173 | 80 | |
| 1889 | — | #191 | 68 | |
| 1888 | — | #181 | 82 | |
| 1887 | — | #151 | 82 | |
| 1886 | — | #180 | 75 | |
| 1885 | — | #202 | 62 | |
| 1884 | — | #161 | 86 | |
| 1883 | — | #155 | 84 | |
| 1882 | — | #177 | 76 | |
| 1881 | — | #178 | 65 | |
| 1880 | — | #126 | 103 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Fredrick was already there! It came in at #126, and was given to 103 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1907, when fewer than 60 boys a year got the name.
Where Fredrick is popular in 1957
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Alabama#123 · 1 in 646
- Idaho#163 · 1 in 915
- Arkansas#186 · 1 in 1,273
- Michigan#186 · 1 in 1,538
- Massachusetts#187 · 1 in 3,196
Best ever in a state: #23 in Alaska, 1933.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | #123 | 61 | 1 in 646 |
| Idaho | #163 | 8 | 1 in 915 |
| Arkansas | #186 | 16 | 1 in 1,273 |
| Michigan | #186 | 66 | 1 in 1,538 |
| Massachusetts | #187 | 18 | 1 in 3,196 |
| West Virginia | #191 | 14 | 1 in 1,542 |
| Florida | #192 | 39 | 1 in 1,283 |
| Oregon | #193 | 12 | 1 in 1,469 |
| Indiana | #196 | 32 | 1 in 1,752 |
| Ohio | #196 | 62 | 1 in 1,925 |
| North Carolina | #197 | 41 | 1 in 1,323 |
| Montana | #201 | 6 | 1 in 1,334 |
| Tennessee | #201 | 28 | 1 in 1,461 |
| Connecticut | #203 | 10 | 1 in 2,677 |
| Mississippi | #203 | 21 | 1 in 1,343 |
| Illinois | #205 | 60 | 1 in 1,936 |
| New Jersey | #205 | 29 | 1 in 2,121 |
| Pennsylvania | #205 | 55 | 1 in 2,307 |
| Kansas | #210 | 15 | 1 in 1,615 |
| Nebraska | #211 | 8 | 1 in 1,954 |
| Wisconsin | #214 | 16 | 1 in 2,922 |
| District of Columbia | #215 | 8 | 1 in 1,866 |
| California | #216 | 101 | 1 in 1,743 |
| Louisiana | #222 | 30 | 1 in 1,444 |
| Missouri | #224 | 25 | 1 in 1,947 |
| Washington | #225 | 15 | 1 in 2,128 |
| Arizona | #228 | 11 | 1 in 1,385 |
| Georgia | #235 | 29 | 1 in 1,721 |
| South Carolina | #237 | 17 | 1 in 1,792 |
| New York | #253 | 65 | 1 in 2,787 |
| Utah | #256 | 7 | 1 in 1,756 |
| Iowa | #271 | 8 | 1 in 3,876 |
| Minnesota | #274 | 9 | 1 in 4,574 |
| Kentucky | #287 | 10 | 1 in 3,644 |
| Colorado | #317 | 6 | 1 in 3,456 |
| Virginia | #332 | 12 | 1 in 3,684 |
| Texas | #342 | 44 | 1 in 2,838 |
| Maryland | #346 | 6 | 1 in 5,463 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Fredrick
- 97 spots since 2024 (#1,631 → #1,728)
- 305 spots since 2020 (#1,423 → #1,728)
- 512 spots since 2015 (#1,216 → #1,728)
- Biggest jump: 113 spots in 2009 (#1,111 → #998)
- Biggest drop: 186 spots in 2008 (#925 → #1,111)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #126 (103 births)
- Births halved by 1894, 14 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 129 yrs · run 1880–2007
- Highest: 1 in 1,073 boys born in 1880 were named Fredrick (0.09%)
- Latest: 1 in 18,171 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 17.6% of all boys named Fredrick (11,347) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 783 | #126 (1880) | #170 |
| 1890s | 617 | #173 (1890) | #218 |
| 1900s | 536 | #234 (1903) | #273 |
| 1910s | 3,248 | #228 (1914) | #247 |
| 1920s | 5,641 | #218 (1926) | #232 |
| 1930s | 5,575 | #194 (1938) | #220 |
| 1940s | 8,232 | #191 (1940) | #202 |
| 1950s | 11,347 | #189 (1953) | #214 |
| 1960s | 8,358 | #248 (1966) | #260 |
| 1970s | 7,742 | #227 (1972) | #267 |
| 1980s | 4,860 | #310 (1980) | #387 |
| 1990s | 3,409 | #468 (1990) | #564 |
| 2000s | 2,089 | #718 (2000) | #879 |
| 2010s | 1,399 | #1,133 (2010) | #1,281 |
| 2020s | 691 | #1,393 (2022) | #1,529 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Fredrick in 1957
Top girls' names in 1957
Top boys' names in 1957
More about 1957
girls
2,044,851 girls got a published name in 1957; 1 in 292,122 of them was named Fredrick, which outranked 29.9% of the 7,015 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #4,536Yong8
- #4,536Ysabel8
- #4,536Zenda8
- #4,918Fredrick7
- #4,918Adah7
- #4,918Adline7
- #4,918Adonica7
- #5,377Abbye6
- #5,377Adam6
- #5,377Adelfa6
Tied with 458 names at #4,918; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,157,236 boys got a published name in 1957; 1 in 2,060 of them was named Fredrick, which outranked 94.8% of the 4,552 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.