Frida
#1,561 for girls in 2025, 135 births
- Peak · girls
- 2003 · 409 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 8,491since 1892
Frida over time
Rank among girls' names. Frida has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,561 | 135 |
| 2024 | #1,242 | 187 |
| 2023 | #1,151 | 211 |
| 2022 | #1,107 | 224 |
| 2021 | #983 | 264 |
| 2020 | #890 | 299 |
| 2019 | #729 | 387 |
| 2018 | #696 | 418 |
| 2017 | #693 | 418 |
| 2016 | #796 | 357 |
| 2015 | #856 | 326 |
| 2014 | #941 | 287 |
| 2013 | #1,220 | 197 |
| 2012 | #1,132 | 217 |
| 2011 | #1,105 | 223 |
| 2010 | #1,015 | 247 |
| 2009 | #930 | 287 |
| 2008 | #886 | 314 |
| 2007 | #826 | 347 |
| 2006 | #838 | 320 |
| 2005 | #757 | 352 |
| 2004 | #725 | 368 |
| 2003 | #648 | 409 |
| 2002 | #759 | 318 |
| 2001 | #911 | 248 |
| 2000 | #1,060 | 196 |
| 1999 | #1,398 | 126 |
| 1998 | #1,295 | 138 |
| 1997 | #1,784 | 84 |
| 1996 | #1,930 | 74 |
| 1995 | #1,850 | 76 |
| 1994 | #2,627 | 47 |
| 1993 | #2,533 | 49 |
| 1992 | #3,680 | 29 |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 |
| 1990 | #5,835 | 15 |
| 1989 | — | |
| 1988 | — | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 |
| 1986 | — | |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 |
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 |
| 1983 | — | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 |
| 1981 | — | |
| 1980 | #6,789 | 9 |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 |
| 1978 | — | |
| 1977 | — | |
| 1976 | — | |
| 1975 | — | |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 |
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 |
| 1971 | #5,136 | 10 |
| 1970 | #5,818 | 8 |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 |
| 1968 | #6,246 | 6 |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 |
| 1964 | #6,767 | 5 |
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 |
| 1960 | — | |
| 1959 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,543 | 12 |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | — | |
| 1946 | — | |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 |
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | #3,971 | 7 |
| 1922 | #3,152 | 10 |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 |
| 1920 | #4,398 | 6 |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 |
| 1917 | #4,594 | 5 |
| 1916 | #3,552 | 7 |
| 1915 | #3,434 | 7 |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,592 | 5 |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,450 | 5 |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Frida! It came in at #1,450, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1892–1912, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Frida is popular in 2020
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arizona#345 · 1 in 1,456
- Illinois#451 · 1 in 2,031
- California#459 · 1 in 2,263
- Texas#462 · 1 in 2,185
- Kansas#571 · 1 in 2,290
Best ever in a state: #208 in Nevada, 2017.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #345 | 19 | 1 in 1,456 |
| Illinois | #451 | 24 | 1 in 2,031 |
| California | #459 | 77 | 1 in 2,263 |
| Texas | #462 | 70 | 1 in 2,185 |
| Kansas | #571 | 5 | 1 in 2,290 |
| Washington | #638 | 10 | 1 in 2,913 |
| New York | #829 | 18 | 1 in 4,421 |
| Florida | #1,440 | 8 | 1 in 10,057 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Frida
- 319 spots since 2024 (#1,242 → #1,561)
- 671 spots since 2020 (#890 → #1,561)
- 705 spots since 2015 (#856 → #1,561)
- Biggest jump: 279 spots in 2014 (#1,220 → #941)
- Biggest drop: 161 spots in 2020 (#729 → #890)
- Debuted 1892
- Peaked 2003 at #648 (409 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 10 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 17 yrs · run 2001–2009
- Highest: 1 in 4,070 girls born in 2018 were named Frida (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 11,906 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #648 in 2003, was only 1 in 4,467 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 37.2% of all girls named Frida (3,159) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 10 | #1,450 (1892) | #1,521 |
| 1900s | 5 | #1,793 (1902) | #1,793 |
| 1910s | 37 | #2,827 (1913) | #3,543 |
| 1920s | 42 | #3,152 (1922) | #4,103 |
| 1930s | 26 | #3,782 (1939) | #4,237 |
| 1940s | 6 | #4,054 (1944) | #4,054 |
| 1950s | 29 | #3,543 (1958) | #5,020 |
| 1960s | 50 | #4,539 (1963) | #5,977 |
| 1970s | 45 | #5,136 (1971) | #6,822 |
| 1980s | 37 | #6,457 (1985) | #8,290 |
| 1990s | 648 | #1,295 (1998) | #3,092 |
| 2000s | 3,159 | #648 (2003) | #834 |
| 2010s | 3,077 | #693 (2017) | #918 |
| 2020s | 1,320 | #890 (2020) | #1,156 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Frida in 2020
Top girls' names in 2020
More about 2020
girls
1,616,549 girls got a published name in 2020; 1 in 5,407 of them was named Frida, which outranked 94.9% of the 17,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.