Garnett

Last seen for girls in 1991 at #13,147 · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to boys 58.1% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1909 · 26 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
3,857
since 1881

Garnett over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201950peak #640, 1904peak #505, 1909girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#12,0085
2024—#8,9878
2023—#12,2395
2022—#12,3305
2021—#12,1465
2020—#12,0225
2019—#10,8036
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014——
2013—#9,6557
2012——
2011—#12,2875
2010—#9,6937
2009—#10,9946
2008—#7,18711
2007——
2006—#7,9989
2005—#7,09610
2004—#6,97610
2003—#8,6437
2002—#7,0559
2001—#6,44510
2000—#6,31610
1999—#6,5309
1998—#5,84010
1997—#6,1009
1996—#5,53510
1995—#6,4078
1994—#5,45210
1993—#5,36010
1992—#5,23610
1991#13,1475#4,76011
1990—#8,1175
1989—#4,52711
1988—#2,86019
1987—#3,73112
1986—#3,26814
1985—#2,71018
1984—#3,10714
1983——
1982—#3,48212
1981—#2,77916
1980#10,3925#2,72917
1979#9,0106#2,66917
1978—#2,27920
1977—#2,91014
1976—#2,24520
1975#7,1737#2,63715
1974#7,6806#2,54915
1973#8,4235#2,12419
1972#8,2925#1,50832
1971#6,0068#1,59730
1970#6,3627#1,69926
1969#4,72310#1,76722
1968#5,1478#1,73121
1967#4,05311#1,44928
1966#4,8668#1,58024
1965#4,4949#1,40530
1964#3,87912#1,18942
1963#4,27210#1,35433
1962#4,26310#1,45429
1961#3,18916#1,49629
1960#4,4379#1,61925
1959#5,5666#1,32435
1958#3,54312#1,17243
1957#3,69611#1,27837
1956#3,18614#1,25737
1955#2,72517#1,11444
1954#2,02727#1,21338
1953#2,81215#1,15541
1952#2,20022#1,08145
1951#1,77230#1,04047
1950#2,18520#96052
1949#1,80728#99749
1948#1,62133#93355
1947#2,08922#88662
1946#1,97022#93551
1945#1,48230#1,10335
1944#1,38134#87852
1943#1,44233#94350
1942#1,34936#95848
1941#1,24337#92547
1940#1,21836#84156
1939#1,26534#86750
1938#1,21936#83455
1937#99250#1,00040
1936#1,32130#79759
1935#1,16237#71672
1934#1,04744#98242
1933#1,08541#79959
1932#1,05645#78665
1931#1,10441#88752
1930#1,00254#85559
1929#88665#90055
1928#90266#89156
1927#91766#78071
1926#95861#75972
1925#85376#73079
1924#97661#83866
1923#80082#71882
1922#78486#71783
1921#81381#75078
1920#72799#68787
1919#83569#73076
1918#75988#74375
1917#84166#74470
1916#73784#74467
1915#69691#67574
1914#76557#58573
1913#76747#80635
1912#70950#70037
1911#70438#73219
1910#69138#78215
1909#90920#50526
1908#88220#77912
1907#72627#59118
1906#84519#70912
1905#73424#66613
1904#64029#76010
1903#78919#52717
1902#71623#1,1375
1901#79517#1,0585
1900#80321#83610
1899#83515#7149
1898#67923#7449
1897#93112#7878
1896#1,04710#7789
1895#89313#7958
1894#81214#8577
1893#95510#8367
1892#90811#7928
1891#9439#7008
1890#82511#8147
1889#75712#9745
1888—#9176
1887——
1886—#7587
1885—#8366
1884—#9715
1883——
1882—#54012
1881—#8665
1880——
First appearance
1881

The first year at least five boys were named Garnett! It came in at #866, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1883–1884, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Garnett is popular in 1950

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedMOKentucky: #335 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,465 boysKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedWVVirginia: #334 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 4,113 boysVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #498 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 8,372 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedALGeorgia: #497 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 8,687 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Garnett, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Virginia#334 · 1 in 4,113
  2. Kentucky#335 · 1 in 4,465
  3. Georgia#497 · 1 in 8,687
  4. North Carolina#498 · 1 in 8,372

Best ever in a state: #99 in Virginia, 1914.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Virginia#33491 in 4,113
Kentucky#33581 in 4,465
Georgia#49751 in 8,687
North Carolina#49861 in 8,372
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Garnett
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 3,021 spots since 2024 (#8,987 → #12,008)
  • 14 spots since 2020 (#12,022 → #12,008)
  • Biggest jump: 610 spots in 1903 (#1,137 → #527)
  • Biggest drop: 277 spots in 1910 (#505 → #782)
Rise & fade · boys
28 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1881
  • Peaked 1909 at #505 (26 births)
  • Births halved by 1982, 73 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 65 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 65 yrs · run 1903–1944
Share of babies · boys
1 in 6,308
  • Highest: 1 in 6,308 boys born in 1909 were named Garnett (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 341,615 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 18.9% of all boys named Garnett (729) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1938
  • Mostly girls until 1937, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s46#540 (1882)#837
1890s80#700 (1891)#782
1900s128#505 (1909)#757
1910s541#585 (1914)#724
1920s729#687 (1920)#777
1930s553#716 (1935)#852
1940s505#841 (1940)#940
1950s419#960 (1950)#1,159
1960s283#1,189 (1964)#1,504
1970s208#1,508 (1972)#2,222
1980s133#2,710 (1985)#3,244
1990s92#4,760 (1991)#5,934
2000s82#6,316 (2000)#7,634
2010s25#9,655 (2013)#10,610
2020s33#8,987 (2024)#11,622

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Garnett in 1950

girls
#2,185
20 births · 1 in 85,653 girls
boys
#960
52 births · 1 in 34,428 boys

Top girls' names in 1950

  1. #1Linda80,433
  2. #2Mary65,481
  3. #3Patricia47,944
  4. #4Barbara41,556
  5. #5Susan38,017
  6. #6Nancy29,617
  7. #7Deborah29,063
  8. #8Sandra28,896
  9. #9Carol26,163
  10. #10Kathleen25,706
  11. #2,185Garnett20

Top boys' names in 1950

  1. #1James86,228
  2. #2Robert83,553
  3. #3John79,412
  4. #4Michael65,136
  5. #5David60,729
  6. #6William60,680
  7. #7Richard51,003
  8. #8Thomas45,596
  9. #9Charles39,095
  10. #10Gary33,737
  11. #960Garnett52
More about 1950

girls

1,713,054 girls got a published name in 1950; 1 in 85,653 of them was named Garnett, which outranked 64.2% of the 6,109 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Garnett
  1. #2,121Tomi21
  2. #2,121Wilhemina21
  3. #2,121Zena21
  4. #2,185Garnett20
  5. #2,185Aleda20
  6. #2,185Almeta20
  7. #2,185Annabell20
  8. #2,253Alean19
  9. #2,253Allean19
  10. #2,253Allen19

Tied with 67 names at #2,185; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1949
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,242Mindy#2,013 → #771
  2. ↑ 649Geralyn#1,627 → #978
  3. ↑ 636Kyle#1,512 → #876
  4. ↑ 416Debrah#1,109 → #693
  5. ↑ 405Debbra#1,353 → #948
Fallers
  1. ↓ 241Luana#823 → #1,064
  2. ↓ 231Christene#930 → #1,161
  3. ↓ 216Pearline#785 → #1,001
  4. ↓ 210Ingrid#518 → #728
  5. ↓ 201Dayle#982 → #1,183

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,790,262 boys got a published name in 1950; 1 in 34,428 of them was named Garnett, which outranked 77.1% of the 4,196 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Garnett
  1. #948Vernell53
  2. #948Warner53
  3. #948Windell53
  4. #960Garnett52
  5. #960Cordell52
  6. #960Gil52
  7. #960Gonzalo52
  8. #973Clarance51
  9. #973Merritt51
  10. #973Michial51

Tied with 12 names at #960; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1949
Risers
  1. ↑ 744Ezzard#1,616 → #872
  2. ↑ 510Kelvin#1,085 → #575
  3. ↑ 447Nancy#1,297 → #850
  4. ↑ 420Samual#1,380 → #960
  5. ↑ 376Shaun#1,275 → #899
Fallers
  1. ↓ 371Sharon#885 → #1,256
  2. ↓ 369Melvyn#770 → #1,139
  3. ↓ 367Les#997 → #1,364
  4. ↓ 351Delmas#905 → #1,256
  5. ↓ 315Denzil#808 → #1,123

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1950 →