Golden

#3,389 for girls in 2025, 45 births · #2,572 for boys in 2025, 51 births
Given to boys 56.2% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1898 · 18 births
Debut · boys
7 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
2,937
since 1880

Golden over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201920peak #616, 1892peak #485, 1898girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,38945#2,57251
2024#3,27748#2,67449
2023#3,04754#2,14767
2022#3,65342#2,83045
2021#4,01436#2,65248
2020#4,26332#3,02538
2019#3,92337#2,80844
2018#4,07635#3,52431
2017#4,22034#3,44032
2016#6,40119#5,31817
2015#6,97717#3,77528
2014#7,30216#4,01425
2013#8,58013#4,62120
2012#10,42910#4,25123
2011#12,1538#4,50921
2010#11,2469#5,04718
2009#13,7047#7,23611
2008#12,5798#7,18711
2007#8,09815#5,21017
2006#7,48216#6,46012
2005#7,50015#8,2998
2004#14,1796#4,79317
2003—#7,8318
2002#9,48210#6,52210
2001#15,3525#6,01311
2000—#4,57316
1999—#7,1398
1998#12,4266#5,84010
1997—#5,64210
1996#10,5677#5,53510
1995—#5,50110
1994—#8,8005
1993—#6,2288
1992#9,4918#6,1288
1991#11,5096#3,63616
1990—#4,99310
1989#8,0379#4,01713
1988#7,6919#4,7869
1987#7,3539#4,23910
1986#9,5456#4,13010
1985#6,9559#3,21614
1984#7,3988#3,27013
1983#5,45712#3,23013
1982#9,2376#4,2349
1981#5,88511#2,89815
1980#9,0956#2,44420
1979#5,75111#1,94327
1978#8,5626#2,06823
1977#6,3409#2,06323
1976—#2,05423
1975#6,4848#5,4645
1974—#3,12011
1973—#3,22310
1972—#3,3449
1971—#3,6588
1970#6,3627#2,89111
1969—#3,9356
1968#5,6427#3,3657
1967#4,9828#3,5596
1966—#2,7849
1965#6,5395#3,2447
1964#5,4747#2,54611
1963#5,2967#1,74421
1962#5,8606#2,36412
1961#4,5469—
1960#6,3905#2,53511
1959—#2,8219
1958#6,1035#1,67722
1957#4,9187#1,95217
1956#3,91010#2,01516
1955#5,8285#2,30212
1954#4,6557#1,76219
1953#4,2268#2,28712
1952#3,04013#1,32332
1951#5,4145#1,68320
1950#4,3157#1,94115
1949#3,39310#1,70219
1948#3,8838#1,61121
1947#3,06112#1,51924
1946#2,59714#1,60120
1945#3,6767#1,63317
1944#2,28715#1,48321
1943#4,6915#1,83316
1942#3,4448#1,53721
1941#2,09616#1,82115
1940#2,10915#1,80215
1939#3,1458#1,19430
1938#2,22514#1,36424
1937#2,10115#1,11934
1936#2,38612#1,29626
1935#1,84518#1,58419
1934#2,42412#1,46122
1933#1,65821#1,12434
1932#2,13015#1,25429
1931#1,63522#1,30228
1930#1,87519#1,13238
1929#1,59824#1,19534
1928#1,33833#1,14738
1927#1,77123#1,06044
1926#1,72124#1,19236
1925#1,46631#1,04044
1924#1,18844#95254
1923#1,42832#1,00848
1922#1,07850#1,05844
1921#96958#92058
1920#1,13244#96551
1919#89062#79966
1918#93758#1,07940
1917#1,18337#87653
1916#90456#91748
1915#96847#92545
1914#1,00335#85540
1913#1,12024#74539
1912#89032#66840
1911#81128#79317
1910#85925#63421
1909#81325#50526
1908#84921#71214
1907#72627#59118
1906#68928#59016
1905#76123#61515
1904#85318#53817
1903#65426#1,0096
1902#79719#58314
1901#96112#7279
1900#70526#69913
1899#1,1818#8577
1898#66624#48518
1897#68121#8527
1896#79017#8268
1895#78816#64011
1894#1,0619#63111
1893#76715#65010
1892#61621—
1891#66916#8416
1890#61718#6679
1889#80211#6739
1888#8949#64810
1887#8608#7527
1886#63313#6948
1885#7459—
1884#7938#9715
1883—#8925
1882——
1881—#8665
1880—#7457
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Golden was already there! It came in at #745, and was given to 7 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1881–1885, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Golden is popular in 1920

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedCAUtah: #169 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 780 boysUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedNEMissouri: #421 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 5,572 boysMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: #195 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 1,382 boysWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #420 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 3,735 boysLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Golden, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Utah#169 · 1 in 780
  2. West Virginia#195 · 1 in 1,382
  3. Louisiana#420 · 1 in 3,735
  4. Missouri#421 · 1 in 5,572

Best ever in a state: #119 in Utah, 1913.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Utah#16961 in 780
West Virginia#195111 in 1,382
Louisiana#42051 in 3,735
Missouri#42151 in 5,572
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Golden
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 102 spots since 2024 (#2,674 → #2,572)
  • 453 spots since 2020 (#3,025 → #2,572)
  • 1,203 spots since 2015 (#3,775 → #2,572)
  • Biggest jump: 471 spots in 1904 (#1,009 → #538)
  • Biggest drop: 426 spots in 1903 (#583 → #1,009)
Rise & fade · boys
18 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1898 at #485 (18 births)
  • Births halved by 1899, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 38 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 38 yrs · run 1904–1917
Share of babies · boys
1 in 6,308
  • Highest: 1 in 6,308 boys born in 1909 were named Golden (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 33,492 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #485 in 1898, was only 1 in 6,816 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 15.4% of all boys named Golden (451) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2019
  • Mostly girls until 2018, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s56#648 (1888)#780
1890s87#485 (1898)#717
1900s148#505 (1909)#657
1910s409#634 (1910)#829
1920s451#920 (1921)#1,054
1930s284#1,119 (1937)#1,283
1940s189#1,483 (1944)#1,654
1950s174#1,323 (1952)#1,976
1960s90#1,744 (1963)#2,897
1970s150#1,943 (1979)#2,983
1980s126#2,444 (1980)#3,646
1990s95#3,636 (1991)#5,944
2000s121#4,573 (2000)#6,412
2010s259#2,808 (2019)#4,131
2020s298#2,147 (2023)#2,650

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Golden in 1920

girls
#1,132
44 births · 1 in 27,234 girls
boys
#965
51 births · 1 in 20,870 boys

Top girls' names in 1920

  1. #1Mary70,983
  2. #2Dorothy36,643
  3. #3Helen35,097
  4. #4Margaret27,994
  5. #5Ruth26,102
  6. #6Mildred18,060
  7. #7Virginia17,314
  8. #8Elizabeth15,908
  9. #9Frances15,883
  10. #10Anna14,581
  11. #1,132Golden44

Top boys' names in 1920

  1. #1John56,913
  2. #2William50,146
  3. #3Robert48,679
  4. #4James47,908
  5. #5Charles28,309
  6. #6George26,891
  7. #7Joseph25,587
  8. #8Edward20,097
  9. #9Frank16,430
  10. #10Richard15,010
  11. #965Golden51
More about 1920

girls

1,198,289 girls got a published name in 1920; 1 in 27,234 of them was named Golden, which outranked 80.4% of the 5,767 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Golden
  1. #1,119Portia45
  2. #1,119Vernetta45
  3. #1,119Zena45
  4. #1,132Golden44
  5. #1,132Alba44
  6. #1,132Amparo44
  7. #1,132Clarence44
  8. #1,152Alvira43
  9. #1,152Bula43
  10. #1,152Carlota43

Tied with 19 names at #1,132; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1919
Risers
  1. ↑ 550Denise#1,481 → #931
  2. ↑ 321Blossom#1,242 → #921
  3. ↑ 311Lilia#1,242 → #931
  4. ↑ 302Ena#1,270 → #968
  5. ↑ 277Lorayne#1,216 → #939
Fallers
  1. ↓ 594Haruko#917 → #1,511
  2. ↓ 511Roselle#1,000 → #1,511
  3. ↓ 345Toshiko#967 → #1,312
  4. ↓ 304Carroll#902 → #1,206
  5. ↓ 297Santina#835 → #1,132

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,064,356 boys got a published name in 1920; 1 in 20,870 of them was named Golden, which outranked 80.7% of the 4,989 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Golden
  1. #960Leonardo52
  2. #960Murl52
  3. #960Oakley52
  4. #965Golden51
  5. #965Almon51
  6. #965Daryl51
  7. #965Hardin51
  8. #975Arne50
  9. #975Artie50
  10. #975Blake50

Tied with 9 names at #965; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1919
Risers
  1. ↑ 960Harding#1,351 → #391
  2. ↑ 607Cameron#1,351 → #744
  3. ↑ 566Hardin#1,531 → #965
  4. ↑ 392Laurel#1,321 → #929
  5. ↑ 368Terrence#1,297 → #929
Fallers
  1. ↓ 789Pershing#593 → #1,382
  2. ↓ 580Woodroe#877 → #1,457
  3. ↓ 385Quinten#867 → #1,252
  4. ↓ 383Orvel#890 → #1,273
  5. ↓ 373Rexford#927 → #1,300

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1920 →