Goldie
#621 for girls in 2025, 469 births · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #8,990
Given to girls 98.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1905 · 548 births
- Debut · girls
- 24 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 38,553since 1880
Goldie over time
Rank among girls' names. Goldie has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #621 | 469 | — | |
| 2024 | #647 | 453 | — | |
| 2023 | #687 | 423 | — | |
| 2022 | #812 | 345 | #8,990 | 8 |
| 2021 | #875 | 311 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,023 | 245 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,377 | 163 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,548 | 140 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,655 | 130 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,757 | 118 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,340 | 79 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,412 | 75 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,123 | 52 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,915 | 39 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,916 | 38 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,107 | 36 | — | |
| 2009 | #4,107 | 37 | — | |
| 2008 | #4,268 | 36 | — | |
| 2007 | #5,097 | 28 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,564 | 44 | — | |
| 2005 | #5,113 | 25 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,566 | 41 | — | |
| 2003 | #5,092 | 24 | — | |
| 2002 | #4,767 | 25 | — | |
| 2001 | #4,688 | 25 | — | |
| 2000 | #4,981 | 23 | — | |
| 1999 | #3,639 | 33 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,730 | 31 | — | |
| 1997 | #3,626 | 31 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #3,942 | 27 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,087 | 37 | — | |
| 1994 | #3,168 | 36 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,938 | 40 | — | |
| 1992 | #2,830 | 42 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,886 | 40 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,523 | 30 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,986 | 36 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,330 | 47 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,434 | 42 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,470 | 40 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,317 | 43 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,470 | 38 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,360 | 40 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,684 | 67 | #5,619 | 6 |
| 1981 | #1,714 | 66 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,570 | 74 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,112 | 47 | #4,403 | 8 |
| 1978 | #2,012 | 47 | #4,554 | 7 |
| 1977 | #1,774 | 57 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,936 | 46 | #4,012 | 8 |
| 1975 | #1,625 | 60 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #2,100 | 39 | #3,837 | 8 |
| 1973 | #1,548 | 60 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,627 | 55 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,516 | 66 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,430 | 72 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,635 | 54 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,126 | 32 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,640 | 48 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,621 | 48 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,635 | 47 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,635 | 49 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,280 | 74 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,292 | 73 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,126 | 95 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,174 | 86 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,066 | 100 | — | |
| 1958 | #981 | 112 | — | |
| 1957 | #924 | 123 | #3,993 | 5 |
| 1956 | #872 | 131 | — | |
| 1955 | #865 | 126 | — | |
| 1954 | #743 | 155 | — | |
| 1953 | #874 | 115 | #3,798 | 5 |
| 1952 | #726 | 150 | — | |
| 1951 | #789 | 127 | — | |
| 1950 | #710 | 145 | — | |
| 1949 | #708 | 143 | — | |
| 1948 | #629 | 172 | — | |
| 1947 | #704 | 145 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #599 | 173 | — | |
| 1945 | #550 | 178 | #2,996 | 6 |
| 1944 | #576 | 162 | #2,633 | 8 |
| 1943 | #507 | 217 | — | |
| 1942 | #507 | 216 | — | |
| 1941 | #465 | 224 | #2,872 | 7 |
| 1940 | #421 | 266 | #2,871 | 7 |
| 1939 | #414 | 266 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #390 | 295 | #2,868 | 7 |
| 1937 | #400 | 263 | #2,680 | 8 |
| 1936 | #345 | 329 | #3,147 | 6 |
| 1935 | #343 | 346 | #3,645 | 5 |
| 1934 | #319 | 383 | — | |
| 1933 | #319 | 380 | #2,368 | 10 |
| 1932 | #310 | 418 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #310 | 424 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #285 | 528 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #279 | 538 | — | |
| 1928 | #255 | 636 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #255 | 664 | #3,451 | 7 |
| 1926 | #239 | 743 | #2,302 | 13 |
| 1925 | #237 | 764 | #2,435 | 12 |
| 1924 | #226 | 845 | #3,023 | 9 |
| 1923 | #217 | 879 | #2,772 | 10 |
| 1922 | #209 | 926 | #2,630 | 11 |
| 1921 | #204 | 984 | #2,152 | 15 |
| 1920 | #197 | 996 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #193 | 989 | #1,882 | 17 |
| 1918 | #193 | 1,021 | #1,905 | 17 |
| 1917 | #187 | 1,012 | #2,732 | 9 |
| 1916 | #178 | 1,039 | #1,505 | 22 |
| 1915 | #172 | 1,051 | #1,707 | 17 |
| 1914 | #173 | 787 | #1,492 | 17 |
| 1913 | #150 | 791 | #2,092 | 8 |
| 1912 | #158 | 688 | #1,619 | 10 |
| 1911 | #140 | 593 | — | |
| 1910 | #139 | 592 | — | |
| 1909 | #134 | 530 | #1,155 | 7 |
| 1908 | #129 | 538 | #779 | 12 |
| 1907 | #126 | 520 | — | |
| 1906 | #131 | 482 | #852 | 9 |
| 1905 | #114 | 548 | — | |
| 1904 | #114 | 513 | #760 | 10 |
| 1903 | #129 | 430 | — | |
| 1902 | #120 | 473 | — | |
| 1901 | #119 | 430 | — | |
| 1900 | #127 | 502 | #1,310 | 5 |
| 1899 | #122 | 397 | — | |
| 1898 | #121 | 446 | #701 | 10 |
| 1897 | #124 | 400 | #1,057 | 5 |
| 1896 | #125 | 384 | #982 | 6 |
| 1895 | #128 | 358 | — | |
| 1894 | #126 | 349 | — | |
| 1893 | #138 | 301 | — | |
| 1892 | #139 | 296 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #126 | 306 | #841 | 6 |
| 1890 | #139 | 254 | — | |
| 1889 | #140 | 246 | — | |
| 1888 | #133 | 261 | — | |
| 1887 | #154 | 159 | — | |
| 1886 | #134 | 204 | — | |
| 1885 | #140 | 167 | — | |
| 1884 | #153 | 135 | — | |
| 1883 | #252 | 51 | — | |
| 1882 | #271 | 41 | — | |
| 1881 | #257 | 39 | — | |
| 1880 | #326 | 24 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Goldie was already there! It came in at #326, and was given to 24 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1996–2003, when fewer than 34 girls a year got the name.
Where Goldie is popular in 1932
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- West Virginia#102 · 1 in 390
- Missouri#174 · 1 in 922
- Virginia#183 · 1 in 1,022
- Kentucky#186 · 1 in 942
- Oklahoma#196 · 1 in 998
Best ever in a state: #28 in West Virginia, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #102 | 45 | 1 in 390 |
| Missouri | #174 | 30 | 1 in 922 |
| Virginia | #183 | 24 | 1 in 1,022 |
| Kentucky | #186 | 29 | 1 in 942 |
| Oklahoma | #196 | 22 | 1 in 998 |
| Kansas | #201 | 11 | 1 in 1,200 |
| Ohio | #220 | 24 | 1 in 1,904 |
| Nebraska | #240 | 6 | 1 in 1,698 |
| Pennsylvania | #240 | 32 | 1 in 2,320 |
| Tennessee | #249 | 16 | 1 in 1,696 |
| Minnesota | #250 | 9 | 1 in 2,151 |
| Maryland | #251 | 5 | 1 in 2,430 |
| Iowa | #255 | 8 | 1 in 2,222 |
| Indiana | #263 | 9 | 1 in 2,530 |
| Louisiana | #263 | 15 | 1 in 1,399 |
| Illinois | #300 | 17 | 1 in 2,971 |
| North Carolina | #300 | 15 | 1 in 2,446 |
| Arkansas | #315 | 9 | 1 in 2,083 |
| Wisconsin | #322 | 6 | 1 in 3,835 |
| Michigan | #327 | 10 | 1 in 3,670 |
| New Jersey | #340 | 5 | 1 in 5,319 |
| New York | #391 | 16 | 1 in 5,506 |
| Alabama | #492 | 5 | 1 in 5,979 |
| Texas | #572 | 11 | 1 in 5,114 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Goldie
- 26 spots since 2024 (#647 → #621)
- 402 spots since 2020 (#1,023 → #621)
- 1,719 spots since 2015 (#2,340 → #621)
- Biggest jump: 148 spots in 2021 (#1,023 → #875)
- Biggest drop: 148 spots in 1953 (#726 → #874)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1905 at #114 (548 births)
- Births halved by 1937, 32 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 84 yrs · run 1880–1958
- Highest: 1 in 532 girls born in 1905 were named Goldie (0.19%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,427 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 22.2% of all girls named Goldie (8,563) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,327 | #133 (1888) | #196 |
| 1890s | 3,491 | #121 (1898) | #129 |
| 1900s | 4,966 | #114 (1905) | #124 |
| 1910s | 8,563 | #139 (1910) | #168 |
| 1920s | 7,975 | #197 (1920) | #232 |
| 1930s | 3,632 | #285 (1930) | #344 |
| 1940s | 1,896 | #421 (1940) | #567 |
| 1950s | 1,284 | #710 (1950) | #855 |
| 1960s | 606 | #1,126 (1961) | #1,516 |
| 1970s | 549 | #1,430 (1970) | #1,768 |
| 1980s | 493 | #1,570 (1980) | #2,234 |
| 1990s | 347 | #2,830 (1992) | #3,337 |
| 2000s | 308 | #3,564 (2006) | #4,524 |
| 2010s | 870 | #1,377 (2019) | #2,615 |
| 2020s | 2,246 | #621 (2025) | #778 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Goldie in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 2,553 of them was named Goldie, which outranked 93.9% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 208,831 of them was named Goldie, which outranked 11.9% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 508 names at #3,776; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.