Hadley
- #121 for girls in 2025, 2,254 births
- #6,803 for boys in 2025, 12 births
- Given to girls 95.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2014 · 3,015 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 1 yrof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 46,595since 1964
Hadley over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #121 | 2,254 | #6,803 | 12 |
| 2024 | #115 | 2,384 | #4,701 | 21 |
| 2023 | #119 | 2,312 | #3,629 | 31 |
| 2022 | #112 | 2,543 | #4,303 | 24 |
| 2021 | #112 | 2,478 | #4,118 | 25 |
| 2020 | #111 | 2,424 | #3,497 | 31 |
| 2019 | #112 | 2,574 | #3,496 | 32 |
| 2018 | #104 | 2,873 | #3,106 | 37 |
| 2017 | #112 | 2,710 | #3,249 | 35 |
| 2016 | #108 | 2,888 | #3,358 | 33 |
| 2015 | #103 | 2,975 | #3,085 | 37 |
| 2014 | #100 | 3,015 | #2,661 | 45 |
| 2013 | #110 | 2,830 | #3,339 | 32 |
| 2012 | #131 | 2,419 | #2,517 | 49 |
| 2011 | #178 | 1,759 | #2,547 | 48 |
| 2010 | #217 | 1,440 | #2,914 | 40 |
| 2009 | #365 | 887 | #2,753 | 44 |
| 2008 | #419 | 769 | #2,753 | 44 |
| 2007 | #469 | 687 | #2,868 | 41 |
| 2006 | #494 | 620 | #3,153 | 34 |
| 2005 | #624 | 450 | #2,653 | 41 |
| 2004 | #692 | 392 | #2,208 | 52 |
| 2003 | #702 | 373 | #3,626 | 24 |
| 2002 | #873 | 262 | #2,755 | 34 |
| 2001 | #855 | 266 | #2,797 | 33 |
| 2000 | #919 | 235 | #2,674 | 34 |
| 1999 | #1,028 | 198 | #2,865 | 29 |
| 1998 | #965 | 212 | #2,711 | 30 |
| 1997 | #1,169 | 157 | #2,981 | 25 |
| 1996 | #1,393 | 119 | #3,293 | 21 |
| 1995 | #1,522 | 102 | #3,693 | 17 |
| 1994 | #1,357 | 123 | #5,109 | 11 |
| 1993 | #1,640 | 92 | #3,819 | 16 |
| 1992 | #1,782 | 81 | #4,872 | 11 |
| 1991 | #2,092 | 64 | #3,813 | 15 |
| 1990 | #2,402 | 51 | #3,166 | 19 |
| 1989 | #2,304 | 51 | #3,205 | 18 |
| 1988 | #2,803 | 37 | #5,200 | 8 |
| 1987 | #2,723 | 36 | #2,838 | 18 |
| 1986 | #2,512 | 39 | #4,853 | 8 |
| 1985 | #3,621 | 23 | #4,333 | 9 |
| 1984 | #2,730 | 33 | #3,270 | 13 |
| 1983 | #2,659 | 33 | #3,884 | 10 |
| 1982 | #2,770 | 33 | #2,709 | 17 |
| 1981 | #3,066 | 28 | #3,030 | 14 |
| 1980 | #3,002 | 29 | #3,838 | 10 |
| 1979 | #2,997 | 28 | #3,018 | 14 |
| 1978 | #3,512 | 21 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,911 | 18 | #3,836 | 9 |
| 1976 | #3,095 | 23 | #4,935 | 6 |
| 1975 | #3,155 | 22 | #3,246 | 11 |
| 1974 | #3,558 | 18 | #5,227 | 5 |
| 1973 | #3,233 | 20 | #5,101 | 5 |
| 1972 | #3,276 | 19 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #5,136 | 10 | #3,370 | 9 |
| 1970 | #4,246 | 13 | #3,521 | 8 |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | #3,062 | 9 |
| 1968 | #6,246 | 6 | #3,107 | 8 |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1966 | #4,866 | 8 | #2,327 | 12 |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #2,780 | 9 |
| 1964 | #5,474 | 7 | — | |
| 1963 | — | #2,539 | 11 | |
| 1962 | — | #2,848 | 9 | |
| 1961 | — | #2,409 | 12 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,423 | 12 | |
| 1959 | — | #2,821 | 9 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,265 | 13 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,257 | 7 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,497 | 11 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,979 | 16 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,942 | 8 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,531 | 10 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,376 | 11 | |
| 1951 | — | #2,662 | 9 | |
| 1950 | — | #2,580 | 9 | |
| 1949 | — | #2,453 | 10 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,443 | 10 | |
| 1947 | — | #2,169 | 13 | |
| 1946 | — | #2,030 | 13 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,697 | 16 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,080 | 12 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,563 | 9 | |
| 1942 | — | #2,523 | 9 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,588 | 19 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,081 | 12 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,159 | 11 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,901 | 14 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,197 | 11 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,452 | 9 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,837 | 15 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,022 | 13 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,368 | 10 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,922 | 15 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,770 | 17 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,693 | 19 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,452 | 11 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,448 | 26 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,516 | 25 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,911 | 17 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,745 | 20 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,641 | 11 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,020 | 16 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,240 | 14 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,904 | 18 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,747 | 20 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,811 | 18 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,827 | 18 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,900 | 16 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,043 | 14 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,968 | 14 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,608 | 15 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,803 | 10 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,527 | 11 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,190 | 9 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,589 | 5 | |
| 1909 | — | #756 | 14 | |
| 1908 | — | #657 | 16 | |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | #1,111 | 6 | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1964
The first year at least five girls were named Hadley! It came in at #5,474, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1964–1968, when fewer than 9 girls a year got the name.
Where Hadley is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Montana#19 · 1 in 113
- Maine#39 · 1 in 164
- North Dakota#40 · 1 in 169
- Vermont#49 · 1 in 122
- Kansas#50 · 1 in 262
Best ever in a state: #9 in South Dakota, 2014.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montana | #19 | 25 | 1 in 113 |
| Maine | #39 | 19 | 1 in 164 |
| North Dakota | #40 | 16 | 1 in 169 |
| Vermont | #49 | 8 | 1 in 122 |
| Kansas | #50 | 45 | 1 in 262 |
| South Dakota | #51 | 15 | 1 in 203 |
| Kentucky | #52 | 63 | 1 in 274 |
| West Virginia | #53 | 22 | 1 in 231 |
| Utah | #56 | 61 | 1 in 280 |
| Minnesota | #60 | 72 | 1 in 298 |
| New Hampshire | #63 | 17 | 1 in 223 |
| Oregon | #67 | 42 | 1 in 311 |
| Idaho | #69 | 26 | 1 in 276 |
| Missouri | #71 | 71 | 1 in 342 |
| Tennessee | #72 | 90 | 1 in 356 |
| Arkansas | #74 | 33 | 1 in 321 |
| Indiana | #75 | 75 | 1 in 372 |
| Michigan | #77 | 89 | 1 in 401 |
| Nebraska | #78 | 24 | 1 in 296 |
| Wisconsin | #79 | 57 | 1 in 355 |
| Wyoming | #79 | 5 | 1 in 162 |
| Oklahoma | #80 | 41 | 1 in 360 |
| Pennsylvania | #86 | 107 | 1 in 436 |
| Iowa | #90 | 32 | 1 in 368 |
| Mississippi | #99 | 22 | 1 in 405 |
| North Carolina | #102 | 100 | 1 in 465 |
| Ohio | #105 | 95 | 1 in 498 |
| South Carolina | #109 | 39 | 1 in 469 |
| Alaska | #112 | 6 | 1 in 276 |
| Delaware | #115 | 7 | 1 in 322 |
| Alabama | #116 | 39 | 1 in 470 |
| Georgia | #123 | 78 | 1 in 580 |
| Massachusetts | #131 | 41 | 1 in 586 |
| Washington | #131 | 51 | 1 in 566 |
| Illinois | #133 | 72 | 1 in 616 |
| Colorado | #138 | 40 | 1 in 583 |
| Louisiana | #140 | 30 | 1 in 546 |
| Rhode Island | #150 | 6 | 1 in 409 |
| Virginia | #160 | 50 | 1 in 675 |
| Connecticut | #162 | 19 | 1 in 605 |
| New York | #180 | 90 | 1 in 870 |
| Texas | #189 | 174 | 1 in 923 |
| Maryland | #242 | 21 | 1 in 952 |
| Arizona | #251 | 28 | 1 in 1,008 |
| Florida | #267 | 71 | 1 in 1,222 |
| New Jersey | #362 | 22 | 1 in 1,614 |
| California | #388 | 85 | 1 in 1,903 |
| Nevada | #433 | 6 | 1 in 1,534 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Hadley
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 10 spots since 2020 (#111 → #121)
- Biggest jump: 204 spots in 1998
- Biggest drop: 63 spots in 1999
Rise & fade · girls
50 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1964
- Peaked 2014 at #100 (3,015 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 1 yr
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 1 yr · 2014
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 2000–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 592
- Highest: 1 in 592 girls born in 2018 were named Hadley (0.17%)
- Latest: 1 in 713 girls born in 2025 (0.14%)
- Its best rank, #100 in 2014, was only 1 in 592 (0.17%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 54.7% of all girls named Hadley (25,483) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 43 | #4,723 (1969) | #5,528 |
| 1970s | 192 | #2,997 (1979) | #3,612 |
| 1980s | 342 | #2,304 (1989) | #2,819 |
| 1990s | 1,199 | #965 (1998) | #1,535 |
| 2000s | 4,941 | #365 (2009) | #641 |
| 2010s | 25,483 | #100 (2014) | #128 |
| 2020s | 14,395 | #111 (2020) | #115 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Hadley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: