Hailey
#104 for girls in 2025, 2,556 births · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 7,027 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 29 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 181,434since 1963
Hailey over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #104 | 2,556 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #100 | 2,627 | — | |
| 2023 | #90 | 2,786 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #79 | 3,005 | — | |
| 2021 | #77 | 3,248 | — | |
| 2020 | #81 | 3,157 | #12,022 | 5 |
| 2019 | #76 | 3,491 | — | |
| 2018 | #79 | 3,474 | — | |
| 2017 | #72 | 3,712 | — | |
| 2016 | #68 | 3,947 | — | |
| 2015 | #64 | 4,251 | #8,040 | 9 |
| 2014 | #51 | 4,619 | — | |
| 2013 | #43 | 5,031 | #8,118 | 9 |
| 2012 | #32 | 5,917 | — | |
| 2011 | #32 | 6,282 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #19 | 7,027 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #25 | 7,325 | #6,802 | 12 |
| 2008 | #25 | 7,872 | #9,871 | 7 |
| 2007 | #23 | 8,439 | #7,590 | 10 |
| 2006 | #25 | 8,423 | #5,303 | 16 |
| 2005 | #26 | 8,595 | #7,096 | 10 |
| 2004 | #24 | 8,685 | #2,643 | 40 |
| 2003 | #26 | 8,798 | #6,715 | 10 |
| 2002 | #31 | 7,992 | #5,725 | 12 |
| 2001 | #33 | 8,032 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #35 | 7,829 | #5,297 | 13 |
| 1999 | #54 | 5,369 | #7,139 | 8 |
| 1998 | #70 | 4,473 | — | |
| 1997 | #80 | 4,148 | #7,281 | 7 |
| 1996 | #93 | 3,762 | #5,535 | 10 |
| 1995 | #111 | 2,965 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #119 | 2,688 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #130 | 2,531 | #7,638 | 6 |
| 1992 | #160 | 1,915 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #196 | 1,506 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #293 | 946 | — | |
| 1989 | #338 | 752 | #5,165 | 9 |
| 1988 | #363 | 673 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #415 | 537 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #472 | 454 | — | |
| 1985 | #537 | 370 | — | |
| 1984 | #724 | 226 | — | |
| 1983 | #842 | 182 | — | |
| 1982 | #893 | 170 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,009 | 144 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,482 | 81 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,431 | 85 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,221 | 102 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,146 | 110 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,188 | 22 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,969 | 24 | — | |
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 | — | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,793 | 11 | — | |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | — | |
| 1968 | #6,246 | 6 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | #4,239 | 5 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,532 | 7 | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Hailey! It came in at #5,891, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1964–1965, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Hailey is popular in 1998
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Idaho#10 · 1 in 79
- Montana#23 · 1 in 106
- Utah#25 · 1 in 152
- South Dakota#32 · 1 in 132
- Washington#33 · 1 in 184
Best ever in a state: #3 in Wyoming, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #10 | 75 | 1 in 79 |
| Montana | #23 | 27 | 1 in 106 |
| Utah | #25 | 109 | 1 in 152 |
| South Dakota | #32 | 22 | 1 in 132 |
| Washington | #33 | 159 | 1 in 184 |
| Oklahoma | #34 | 91 | 1 in 186 |
| Nevada | #36 | 51 | 1 in 179 |
| Louisiana | #42 | 103 | 1 in 212 |
| Oregon | #42 | 80 | 1 in 206 |
| Tennessee | #45 | 139 | 1 in 220 |
| North Dakota | #47 | 15 | 1 in 177 |
| Arkansas | #50 | 54 | 1 in 220 |
| Wisconsin | #51 | 121 | 1 in 208 |
| North Carolina | #52 | 163 | 1 in 258 |
| Arizona | #54 | 106 | 1 in 276 |
| Minnesota | #54 | 122 | 1 in 207 |
| Delaware | #55 | 17 | 1 in 185 |
| Iowa | #55 | 63 | 1 in 223 |
| Vermont | #55 | 11 | 1 in 176 |
| Kentucky | #56 | 80 | 1 in 255 |
| Alaska | #58 | 13 | 1 in 199 |
| Missouri | #58 | 121 | 1 in 245 |
| Michigan | #59 | 191 | 1 in 270 |
| South Carolina | #61 | 58 | 1 in 289 |
| Kansas | #63 | 49 | 1 in 264 |
| Rhode Island | #63 | 20 | 1 in 207 |
| Nebraska | #66 | 34 | 1 in 238 |
| Wyoming | #66 | 7 | 1 in 187 |
| Virginia | #68 | 103 | 1 in 329 |
| Colorado | #74 | 68 | 1 in 327 |
| Mississippi | #76 | 36 | 1 in 338 |
| Massachusetts | #77 | 97 | 1 in 329 |
| Florida | #79 | 188 | 1 in 395 |
| Ohio | #79 | 177 | 1 in 348 |
| Indiana | #82 | 91 | 1 in 364 |
| New Hampshire | #82 | 17 | 1 in 285 |
| Maine | #85 | 16 | 1 in 289 |
| West Virginia | #91 | 21 | 1 in 348 |
| Connecticut | #92 | 41 | 1 in 379 |
| Texas | #93 | 341 | 1 in 421 |
| Pennsylvania | #96 | 136 | 1 in 429 |
| Alabama | #97 | 47 | 1 in 444 |
| Illinois | #100 | 157 | 1 in 449 |
| Georgia | #101 | 87 | 1 in 512 |
| Maryland | #102 | 55 | 1 in 435 |
| New Jersey | #105 | 85 | 1 in 488 |
| Hawaii | #110 | 11 | 1 in 345 |
| California | #112 | 431 | 1 in 513 |
| New Mexico | #116 | 20 | 1 in 423 |
| New York | #147 | 143 | 1 in 704 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Hailey
- 4 spots since 2024 (#100 → #104)
- 23 spots since 2020 (#81 → #104)
- 40 spots since 2015 (#64 → #104)
- Biggest jump: 187 spots in 1985 (#724 → #537)
- Biggest drop: 13 spots in 2011 (#19 → #32)
- Debuted 1963
- Peaked 2010 at #19 (7,027 births)
- Births halved by 2018, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 29 yrs · run 1996–2024
- Top 1,000: 44 yrs · run 1982–2025
- Highest: 1 in 208 girls born in 2003 were named Hailey (0.48%)
- Latest: 1 in 629 girls born in 2025 (0.16%)
- Its best rank, #19 in 2010, was only 1 in 253 (0.40%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 45.2% of all girls named Hailey (81,990) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25 | #5,809 (1966) | #5,980 |
| 1970s | 397 | #1,146 (1977) | #3,478 |
| 1980s | 3,589 | #338 (1989) | #708 |
| 1990s | 30,303 | #54 (1999) | #131 |
| 2000s | 81,990 | #23 (2007) | #27 |
| 2010s | 47,751 | #19 (2010) | #54 |
| 2020s | 17,379 | #77 (2021) | #89 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Hailey in 1998
Top girls' names in 1998
More about 1998
girls
1,766,949 girls got a published name in 1998; 1 in 395 of them was named Hailey, which outranked 99.6% of the 16,601 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 11.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.