Hailey
#104 for girls in 2025, 2,556 births · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 7,027 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 29 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 181,434since 1963
Hailey over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #104 | 2,556 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #100 | 2,627 | — | |
| 2023 | #90 | 2,786 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #79 | 3,005 | — | |
| 2021 | #77 | 3,248 | — | |
| 2020 | #81 | 3,157 | #12,022 | 5 |
| 2019 | #76 | 3,491 | — | |
| 2018 | #79 | 3,474 | — | |
| 2017 | #72 | 3,712 | — | |
| 2016 | #68 | 3,947 | — | |
| 2015 | #64 | 4,251 | #8,040 | 9 |
| 2014 | #51 | 4,619 | — | |
| 2013 | #43 | 5,031 | #8,118 | 9 |
| 2012 | #32 | 5,917 | — | |
| 2011 | #32 | 6,282 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #19 | 7,027 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #25 | 7,325 | #6,802 | 12 |
| 2008 | #25 | 7,872 | #9,871 | 7 |
| 2007 | #23 | 8,439 | #7,590 | 10 |
| 2006 | #25 | 8,423 | #5,303 | 16 |
| 2005 | #26 | 8,595 | #7,096 | 10 |
| 2004 | #24 | 8,685 | #2,643 | 40 |
| 2003 | #26 | 8,798 | #6,715 | 10 |
| 2002 | #31 | 7,992 | #5,725 | 12 |
| 2001 | #33 | 8,032 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #35 | 7,829 | #5,297 | 13 |
| 1999 | #54 | 5,369 | #7,139 | 8 |
| 1998 | #70 | 4,473 | — | |
| 1997 | #80 | 4,148 | #7,281 | 7 |
| 1996 | #93 | 3,762 | #5,535 | 10 |
| 1995 | #111 | 2,965 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #119 | 2,688 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #130 | 2,531 | #7,638 | 6 |
| 1992 | #160 | 1,915 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #196 | 1,506 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #293 | 946 | — | |
| 1989 | #338 | 752 | #5,165 | 9 |
| 1988 | #363 | 673 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #415 | 537 | #6,089 | 6 |
| 1986 | #472 | 454 | — | |
| 1985 | #537 | 370 | — | |
| 1984 | #724 | 226 | — | |
| 1983 | #842 | 182 | — | |
| 1982 | #893 | 170 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,009 | 144 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,482 | 81 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,431 | 85 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,221 | 102 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,146 | 110 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,188 | 22 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,969 | 24 | — | |
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 | — | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,793 | 11 | — | |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | — | |
| 1968 | #6,246 | 6 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | #4,239 | 5 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,532 | 7 | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Hailey! It came in at #5,891, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1964–1965, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Hailey is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Montana#7 · 1 in 70
- Wyoming#14 · 1 in 76
- New Mexico#17 · 1 in 138
- Nevada#17 · 1 in 159
- Idaho#18 · 1 in 123
Best ever in a state: #3 in Wyoming, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montana | #7 | 42 | 1 in 70 |
| Wyoming | #14 | 17 | 1 in 76 |
| Nevada | #17 | 72 | 1 in 159 |
| New Mexico | #17 | 58 | 1 in 138 |
| Idaho | #18 | 55 | 1 in 123 |
| Oregon | #18 | 110 | 1 in 142 |
| Colorado | #19 | 142 | 1 in 168 |
| North Dakota | #19 | 30 | 1 in 88 |
| South Dakota | #19 | 25 | 1 in 121 |
| Wisconsin | #19 | 160 | 1 in 153 |
| Alaska | #20 | 20 | 1 in 117 |
| Nebraska | #20 | 58 | 1 in 142 |
| Connecticut | #21 | 90 | 1 in 140 |
| Iowa | #21 | 92 | 1 in 144 |
| Kentucky | #21 | 127 | 1 in 152 |
| Arizona | #22 | 167 | 1 in 201 |
| Hawaii | #22 | 26 | 1 in 129 |
| Washington | #22 | 177 | 1 in 177 |
| Minnesota | #23 | 151 | 1 in 164 |
| New Hampshire | #24 | 36 | 1 in 110 |
| New York | #24 | 478 | 1 in 198 |
| Rhode Island | #24 | 23 | 1 in 133 |
| West Virginia | #24 | 50 | 1 in 136 |
| Missouri | #25 | 159 | 1 in 176 |
| Pennsylvania | #25 | 310 | 1 in 176 |
| Florida | #26 | 388 | 1 in 212 |
| Louisiana | #26 | 105 | 1 in 197 |
| Utah | #26 | 103 | 1 in 185 |
| Kansas | #28 | 67 | 1 in 205 |
| Michigan | #28 | 210 | 1 in 204 |
| North Carolina | #28 | 237 | 1 in 196 |
| Arkansas | #29 | 60 | 1 in 197 |
| California | #29 | 916 | 1 in 238 |
| Maine | #29 | 28 | 1 in 141 |
| Ohio | #30 | 265 | 1 in 205 |
| Texas | #30 | 692 | 1 in 241 |
| Indiana | #31 | 151 | 1 in 210 |
| Maryland | #31 | 120 | 1 in 206 |
| Tennessee | #33 | 138 | 1 in 221 |
| Delaware | #34 | 19 | 1 in 144 |
| South Carolina | #34 | 89 | 1 in 208 |
| New Jersey | #35 | 167 | 1 in 229 |
| Oklahoma | #35 | 74 | 1 in 233 |
| Illinois | #37 | 244 | 1 in 259 |
| Virginia | #37 | 163 | 1 in 225 |
| Mississippi | #41 | 51 | 1 in 231 |
| Vermont | #41 | 10 | 1 in 128 |
| Massachusetts | #46 | 110 | 1 in 239 |
| Georgia | #47 | 179 | 1 in 283 |
| Alabama | #81 | 55 | 1 in 364 |
| District of Columbia | #125 | 9 | 1 in 333 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Hailey
- 4 spots since 2024 (#100 → #104)
- 23 spots since 2020 (#81 → #104)
- 40 spots since 2015 (#64 → #104)
- Biggest jump: 187 spots in 1985 (#724 → #537)
- Biggest drop: 13 spots in 2011 (#19 → #32)
- Debuted 1963
- Peaked 2010 at #19 (7,027 births)
- Births halved by 2018, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 29 yrs · run 1996–2024
- Top 1,000: 44 yrs · run 1982–2025
- Highest: 1 in 208 girls born in 2003 were named Hailey (0.48%)
- Latest: 1 in 629 girls born in 2025 (0.16%)
- Its best rank, #19 in 2010, was only 1 in 253 (0.40%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 45.2% of all girls named Hailey (81,990) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25 | #5,809 (1966) | #5,980 |
| 1970s | 397 | #1,146 (1977) | #3,478 |
| 1980s | 3,589 | #338 (1989) | #708 |
| 1990s | 30,303 | #54 (1999) | #131 |
| 2000s | 81,990 | #23 (2007) | #27 |
| 2010s | 47,751 | #19 (2010) | #54 |
| 2020s | 17,379 | #77 (2021) | #89 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Hailey in 2009
Top girls' names in 2009
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
girls
1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 251 of them was named Hailey, which outranked 99.9% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 165,298 of them was named Hailey, which outranked 53.2% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #6,436Ziyan13
- #6,436Zyire13
- #6,436Zymier13
- #6,802Hailey12
- #6,802Aadit12
- #6,802Aalijah12
- #6,802Abdalla12
- #7,236Abdalrahman11
- #7,236Acelin11
- #7,236Ahan11
Tied with 433 names at #6,802; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.