Haleigh
#4,352 for girls in 2025, 32 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #7,536
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2000 · 789 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 14,284since 1978
Haleigh over time
Rank among girls' names. Haleigh has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,352 | 32 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,207 | 34 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,091 | 53 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,220 | 50 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,037 | 54 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,241 | 80 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,598 | 133 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,623 | 131 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,677 | 128 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,368 | 172 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,227 | 201 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,040 | 249 | — | |
| 2013 | #929 | 273 | — | |
| 2012 | #929 | 276 | — | |
| 2011 | #777 | 350 | — | |
| 2010 | #633 | 463 | — | |
| 2009 | #587 | 515 | — | |
| 2008 | #720 | 413 | — | |
| 2007 | #621 | 480 | — | |
| 2006 | #610 | 479 | — | |
| 2005 | #520 | 562 | — | |
| 2004 | #492 | 598 | #7,536 | 9 |
| 2003 | #394 | 771 | — | |
| 2002 | #421 | 691 | — | |
| 2001 | #394 | 739 | — | |
| 2000 | #372 | 789 | — | |
| 1999 | #425 | 649 | — | |
| 1998 | #430 | 617 | — | |
| 1997 | #441 | 578 | — | |
| 1996 | #389 | 680 | — | |
| 1995 | #459 | 552 | — | |
| 1994 | #478 | 521 | — | |
| 1993 | #487 | 520 | — | |
| 1992 | #587 | 391 | — | |
| 1991 | #670 | 322 | — | |
| 1990 | #962 | 195 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,009 | 170 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,314 | 110 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,313 | 105 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,669 | 70 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,804 | 33 | — | |
| 1984 | #4,966 | 14 | — | |
| 1983 | #5,457 | 12 | — | |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | — | |
| 1981 | #5,571 | 12 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | — | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Haleigh! It came in at #9,750, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1978–1980, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Haleigh is popular in 2016
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#378 · 1 in 1,387
- Alabama#395 · 1 in 1,615
- South Carolina#576 · 1 in 2,551
- Louisiana#596 · 1 in 2,623
- Massachusetts#844 · 1 in 5,095
Best ever in a state: #75 in West Virginia, 2003.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #378 | 8 | 1 in 1,387 |
| Alabama | #395 | 12 | 1 in 1,615 |
| South Carolina | #576 | 7 | 1 in 2,551 |
| Louisiana | #596 | 8 | 1 in 2,623 |
| Massachusetts | #844 | 5 | 1 in 5,095 |
| North Carolina | #1,002 | 8 | 1 in 5,664 |
| Virginia | #1,036 | 6 | 1 in 6,190 |
| Tennessee | #1,087 | 5 | 1 in 6,208 |
| Ohio | #1,151 | 7 | 1 in 7,438 |
| New Jersey | #1,168 | 5 | 1 in 7,315 |
| New York | #1,265 | 11 | 1 in 8,167 |
| Michigan | #1,278 | 5 | 1 in 8,414 |
| Georgia | #1,499 | 5 | 1 in 9,610 |
| Texas | #1,697 | 13 | 1 in 12,869 |
| Florida | #1,813 | 6 | 1 in 14,451 |
| California | #2,306 | 9 | 1 in 22,635 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Haleigh
- 145 spots since 2024 (#4,207 → #4,352)
- 2,111 spots since 2020 (#2,241 → #4,352)
- 3,125 spots since 2015 (#1,227 → #4,352)
- Biggest jump: 292 spots in 1991 (#962 → #670)
- Biggest drop: 152 spots in 2012 (#777 → #929)
- Debuted 1978
- Peaked 2000 at #372 (789 births)
- Births halved by 2011, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 24 yrs · run 1990–2013
- Highest: 1 in 2,302 girls born in 2000 were named Haleigh (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 50,227 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 42.3% of all girls named Haleigh (6,037) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 5 | #9,750 (1978) | #9,750 |
| 1980s | 538 | #1,009 (1989) | #3,293 |
| 1990s | 5,025 | #389 (1996) | #533 |
| 2000s | 6,037 | #372 (2000) | #513 |
| 2010s | 2,376 | #633 (2010) | #1,180 |
| 2020s | 303 | #2,241 (2020) | #3,358 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Haleigh in 2016
Top girls' names in 2016
More about 2016
girls
1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 10,302 of them was named Haleigh, which outranked 92.8% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).