Hampton

#3,832 for girls in 2025, 38 births · #1,443 for boys in 2025, 124 births
Given to boys 94.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1891 · 13 births
Debut · boys
6 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
4,780
since 1880

Hampton over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201911peak #497, 1891girlsat peakboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#3,83238#1,443124
2024#6,16719#1,521116
2023#5,54922#1,75493
2022#6,46418#1,626107
2021#8,46412#1,597107
2020#8,95311#1,69492
2019#7,34215#1,73790
2018#11,4278#1,80984
2017#7,44215#1,73589
2016#10,11310#2,27858
2015#8,00814#1,91076
2014#11,9318#1,95973
2013—#1,72585
2012#14,9626#1,98371
2011#13,3477#1,99968
2010#14,9596#2,06965
2009—#2,01069
2008#17,5045#2,37454
2007#10,12911#2,41653
2006#12,4208#2,37552
2005#16,4625#2,29751
2004#16,0995#2,37647
2003#15,7845#2,00657
2002—#2,68535
2001#13,5216#2,38641
2000—#2,13647
1999—#2,46236
1998#14,1225#2,50734
1997—#2,44933
1996—#2,74727
1995—#2,17837
1994—#2,18137
1993—#2,50929
1992—#2,25333
1991—#3,10520
1990—#2,62825
1989—#2,61524
1988—#2,50923
1987—#2,72519
1986—#2,77918
1985—#2,71018
1984—#3,92510
1983—#2,91215
1982—#2,97215
1981—#3,60111
1980—#2,96515
1979—#4,4038
1978—#3,61410
1977—#2,91014
1976—#3,09512
1975—#2,75114
1974—#2,35817
1973—#2,12419
1972—#3,6228
1971—#2,36616
1970—#1,79424
1969—#1,86120
1968—#2,03016
1967—#1,60923
1966—#1,89117
1965—#1,80619
1964—#1,97517
1963—#1,90218
1962—#1,51527
1961—#1,63524
1960—#1,40032
1959—#1,70922
1958—#2,02616
1957—#1,34534
1956—#1,41830
1955—#1,48327
1954—#1,46627
1953—#1,48026
1952—#1,32332
1951—#1,34430
1950—#1,28931
1949—#1,38028
1948—#1,37828
1947—#1,17638
1946—#1,32728
1945—#1,03938
1944—#1,32825
1943—#1,21432
1942—#1,05441
1941—#1,25428
1940—#1,18332
1939—#1,19430
1938—#1,04338
1937—#1,23329
1936—#98940
1935—#1,49421
1934—#1,00741
1933—#1,05138
1932—#1,65119
1931—#1,07839
1930—#1,02145
1929—#1,13837
1928—#1,05743
1927—#1,02247
1926—#94452
1925—#1,14438
1924—#1,07144
1923—#1,08743
1922—#90559
1921—#93157
1920—#1,00447
1919—#1,02444
1918—#89455
1917—#83958
1916—#1,09635
1915—#99640
1914—#88438
1913—#89730
1912—#80030
1911—#70720
1910—#98111
1909—#95110
1908—#87710
1907—#51121
1906—#75211
1905—#61515
1904—#8748
1903—#57615
1902—#55615
1901—#7798
1900—#78511
1899—#7868
1898—#57314
1897——
1896—#7789
1895—#8727
1894—#63111
1893—#7688
1892—#68810
1891—#49713
1890——
1889—#9745
1888—#1,0315
1887——
1886—#51213
1885—#6419
1884—#61310
1883—#6449
1882—#6529
1881—#53311
1880—#8096
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Hampton was already there! It came in at #809, and was given to 6 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1887–1890, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Hampton is popular in 1911

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: #146 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 825 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Hampton, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. South Carolina#146 · 1 in 825

Best ever in a state: #146 in South Carolina, 1911.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Carolina#14671 in 825
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Hampton
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 78 spots since 2024 (#1,521 → #1,443)
  • 251 spots since 2020 (#1,694 → #1,443)
  • 467 spots since 2015 (#1,910 → #1,443)
  • Biggest jump: 505 spots in 1936 (#1,494 → #989)
  • Biggest drop: 366 spots in 1908 (#511 → #877)
Rise & fade · boys
11 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1891 at #497 (13 births)
  • Births halved by 1897, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 38 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 38 yrs · run 1898–1915
Share of babies · boys
1 in 6,992
  • Highest: 1 in 6,992 boys born in 1907 were named Hampton (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 13,775 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
  • Its best rank, #497 in 1891, was only 1 in 7,784 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 15.9% of all boys named Hampton (759) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
  • The majority has never changed
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s77#512 (1886)#712
1890s80#497 (1891)#699
1900s124#511 (1907)#728
1910s361#707 (1911)#912
1920s467#905 (1922)#1,030
1930s340#989 (1936)#1,176
1940s318#1,039 (1945)#1,233
1950s275#1,289 (1950)#1,488
1960s213#1,400 (1960)#1,762
1970s142#1,794 (1970)#2,904
1980s168#2,509 (1988)#2,971
1990s311#2,178 (1995)#2,502
2000s506#2,006 (2003)#2,306
2010s759#1,725 (2013)#1,920
2020s639#1,443 (2025)#1,606

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Hampton in 1911

boys
#707
20 births · 1 in 11,299 boys

Top boys' names in 1911

  1. #1John13,446
  2. #2William10,593
  3. #3James9,952
  4. #4George6,586
  5. #5Robert6,526
  6. #6Joseph6,488
  7. #7Charles5,725
  8. #8Frank4,314
  9. #9Edward4,164
  10. #10Thomas3,292
  11. #707Hampton20
More about 1911

boys

225,970 boys got a published name in 1911; 1 in 11,299 of them was named Hampton, which outranked 64.6% of the 1,999 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Hampton
  1. #689Vincenzo21
  2. #689Watson21
  3. #689Wyman21
  4. #707Hampton20
  5. #707Addison20
  6. #707Anna20
  7. #707Artie20
  8. #732Alf19
  9. #732Arden19
  10. #732Arvil19

Tied with 24 names at #707; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1910
Risers
  1. ↑ 900Vincenzo#1,589 → #689
  2. ↑ 900Wyman#1,589 → #689
  3. ↑ 882Rodger#1,589 → #707
  4. ↑ 796Cedric#1,589 → #793
  5. ↑ 796Hughie#1,589 → #793
Fallers
  1. ↓ 881Bertha#859 → #1,740
  2. ↓ 881Arlo#859 → #1,740
  3. ↓ 831Shelton#556 → #1,387
  4. ↓ 812Guss#928 → #1,740
  5. ↓ 812Halley#928 → #1,740

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1911 →