Hanley
- #8,860 for girls in 2025, 11 births
- #8,243 for boys in 2025, 9 births
- Given to boys 70.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1914 · 11 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 669since 1913
Hanley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #8,860 | 11 | #8,243 | 9 |
| 2024 | #12,161 | 7 | #8,312 | 9 |
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 | #7,289 | 11 |
| 2022 | #10,383 | 9 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #11,146 | 8 | #8,825 | 8 |
| 2020 | #7,969 | 13 | #9,554 | 7 |
| 2019 | #5,798 | 21 | #5,340 | 17 |
| 2018 | #8,146 | 13 | #4,094 | 25 |
| 2017 | #7,442 | 15 | #3,781 | 28 |
| 2016 | #7,602 | 15 | #5,789 | 15 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | #4,080 | 25 |
| 2014 | #5,993 | 21 | #3,371 | 32 |
| 2013 | #11,969 | 8 | #3,060 | 36 |
| 2012 | #6,872 | 18 | #3,530 | 30 |
| 2011 | #5,935 | 22 | #3,994 | 25 |
| 2010 | #7,513 | 16 | #4,848 | 19 |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | #4,429 | 22 |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | #6,070 | 14 |
| 2007 | #13,924 | 7 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #9,585 | 7 |
| 2005 | — | #7,640 | 9 | |
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | — | |
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | #7,536 | 8 | |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | — | |
| 1999 | — | #8,704 | 6 | |
| 1998 | — | #9,631 | 5 | |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | — | |
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | — | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | #5,772 | 5 | |
| 1977 | — | #4,582 | 7 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | #3,966 | 5 | |
| 1966 | — | #3,249 | 7 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,982 | 8 | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | #3,827 | 5 | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | #3,714 | 5 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,021 | 7 | |
| 1949 | — | #3,690 | 5 | |
| 1948 | — | #3,010 | 7 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,096 | 7 | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #2,862 | 7 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,405 | 10 | |
| 1942 | — | #3,560 | 5 | |
| 1941 | — | #2,656 | 8 | |
| 1940 | — | #3,130 | 6 | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | #2,905 | 7 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,854 | 7 | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | #2,973 | 7 | |
| 1933 | — | #3,642 | 5 | |
| 1932 | — | #3,092 | 7 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,651 | 9 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,659 | 10 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,523 | 11 | |
| 1926 | — | #2,725 | 10 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,755 | 10 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,473 | 12 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,614 | 11 | |
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | #2,804 | 10 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,459 | 12 | |
| 1919 | — | #3,736 | 6 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,096 | 8 | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | #2,259 | 12 | |
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | #1,975 | 11 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,273 | 7 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1913
The first year at least five boys were named Hanley! It came in at #2,273, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1915, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Hanley is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Hanley in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Hanley
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 69 spots since 2024 (#8,312 → #8,243)
- 1,311 spots since 2020 (#9,554 → #8,243)
- 4,163 spots since 2015 (#4,080 → #8,243)
Rise & fade · boys
1 yr to peak
- Debuted 1913
- Peaked 1914 at #1,975 (11 births)
- Births halved by 1915, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 52,544
- Highest: 1 in 52,544 boys born in 2013 were named Hanley (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 189,786 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,975 in 1914, was only 1 in 59,524 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 37.7% of all boys named Hanley (252) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2025
- Mostly boys until 2024, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 44 | #1,975 (1914) | #2,668 |
| 1920s | 92 | #2,459 (1920) | #2,730 |
| 1930s | 51 | #2,651 (1931) | #2,985 |
| 1940s | 55 | #2,405 (1943) | #3,051 |
| 1950s | 17 | #3,021 (1950) | #3,521 |
| 1960s | 20 | #2,982 (1965) | #3,399 |
| 1970s | 12 | #4,582 (1977) | #5,177 |
| 1980s | 0 | — | — |
| 1990s | 11 | #8,704 (1999) | #9,168 |
| 2000s | 65 | #4,429 (2009) | #7,938 |
| 2010s | 252 | #3,060 (2013) | #4,189 |
| 2020s | 50 | #7,289 (2023) | #8,848 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Hanley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: