Hannah

#56 for girls in 2025, 3,973 births · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #9,823
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2000 · 23,087 births
Debut · girls
221 births
In top 100 · girls
41 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
465,685
since 1880

Hannah over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201915peak #2, 2000girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#563,973—
2024#524,078—
2023#484,127—
2022#474,490#9,8237
2021#444,590#12,1465
2020#394,972#10,6056
2019#325,644#10,8036
2018#335,680#12,1565
2017#325,934#10,7756
2016#336,038—
2015#286,434#8,0409
2014#286,593#12,1085
2013#237,307#8,1189
2012#227,293#9,7097
2011#256,584#10,8086
2010#206,999#8,8038
2009#237,584#6,43613
2008#179,577#6,76312
2007#913,323#5,21017
2006#814,556#6,09413
2005#714,854#5,87513
2004#515,614#1,384103
2003#417,638#3,62624
2002#318,828#3,34926
2001#320,723#3,72122
2000#223,087#3,29925
1999#221,679#3,10326
1998#221,376#3,48621
1997#520,597#3,73818
1996#718,596#3,29321
1995#717,018#3,10022
1994#1614,494#3,59618
1993#2112,510#3,36819
1992#2611,496#4,56412
1991#2910,769#2,82823
1990#3010,283#2,37329
1989#427,830#1,67846
1988#615,562#2,59922
1987#664,594#2,21526
1986#823,388#3,65312
1985#1172,449#4,6988
1984#1262,265#3,10714
1983#1242,398#3,41112
1982#1751,581#5,0037
1981#1901,414—
1980#2131,221#4,9407
1979#253970#5,3556
1978#312735—
1977#348632—
1976#384536—
1975#443444—
1974#518324—
1973#550301—
1972#619251—
1971#793179—
1970#803172—
1969#881142—
1968#859142—
1967#926122—
1966#869133—
1965#908123—
1964#890136—
1963#865146—
1962#885142—
1961#869150—
1960#920133—
1959#891136—
1958#925124—
1957#924123—
1956#838141—
1955#834135—
1954#748153—
1953#733154—
1952#723151—
1951#680165—
1950#664165—
1949#636170—
1948#610183—
1947#617184—
1946#662144—
1945#589153—
1944#565166—
1943#537195—
1942#510214—
1941#513180—
1940#504188—
1939#458212—
1938#472197—
1937#463199—
1936#489174—
1935#448208—
1934#424239—
1933#461202—
1932#432231—
1931#441213—
1930#414251—
1929#416255—
1928#410273—
1927#367348—
1926#351360—
1925#345381—
1924#348381—
1923#310434—
1922#321412—
1921#295496—
1920#299471—
1919#276534#4,1685
1918#279513—
1917#267541—
1916#260549—
1915#253546—
1914#249443—
1913#243396—
1912#237359—
1911#235279—
1910#213305—
1909#206278—
1908#223240—
1907#211239—
1906#191256—
1905#205219—
1904#182261—
1903#183250—
1902#174271—
1901#170266—
1900#169325—
1899#157288—
1898#148338—
1897#158288—
1896#146323—
1895#148301—
1894#150293—
1893#136304—
1892#132326—
1891#128293—
1890#136267—
1889#127301—
1888#123295—
1887#109279—
1886#116254—
1885#113236—
1884#103275—
1883#110209—
1882#106214—
1881#103196—
1880#96221—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Hannah was already there! It came in at #96, and was given to 221 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1948–1971, when fewer than 190 girls a year got the name.

Where Hannah is popular in 1915

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedAKMaine: #162 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 718 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedNHWashington: #164 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 977 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #262 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,206 girlsMNIllinois: #246 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 2,220 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedWIMichigan: #328 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,478 girlsMINew York: #168 for girls · 93 births · 1 in 984 girlsNYMassachusetts: #205 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,911 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedSDIowa: #258 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,900 girlsIAIndiana: #302 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,856 girlsINOhio: #258 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 2,536 girlsOHPennsylvania: #161 for girls · 76 births · 1 in 1,148 girlsPANew Jersey: #160 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 968 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #394 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,729 girlsCAUtah: #188 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 806 girlsUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedCONebraska: #186 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,047 girlsNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedMOKentucky: #242 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,572 girlsKYWest Virginia: #361 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,959 girlsWVVirginia: #233 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,769 girlsVAMaryland: #190 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,332 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedNMKansas: #322 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,671 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedARTennessee: #315 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,382 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #189 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 1,073 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #150 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 760 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #370 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,801 girlsOKLouisiana: #328 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,103 girlsLAMississippi: #285 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,844 girlsMSAlabama: #262 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,663 girlsALGeorgia: #306 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,418 girlsGAHawaii: #51 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 163 girlsHITexas: #587 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,791 girlsTXFlorida: #227 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,199 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Hawaii#51 · 1 in 163
  2. South Carolina#150 · 1 in 760
  3. New Jersey#160 · 1 in 968
  4. Pennsylvania#161 · 1 in 1,148
  5. Maine#162 · 1 in 718

Best ever in a state: #1 in Kentucky, 1996.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Hawaii#51121 in 163
South Carolina#150231 in 760
New Jersey#160281 in 968
Pennsylvania#161761 in 1,148
Maine#16281 in 718
Washington#16481 in 977
New York#168931 in 984
Nebraska#186101 in 1,047
Utah#18851 in 806
North Carolina#189271 in 1,073
Maryland#19091 in 1,332
Massachusetts#205171 in 1,911
Florida#22771 in 1,199
Virginia#233131 in 1,769
Kentucky#242151 in 1,572
Illinois#246241 in 2,220
Iowa#258101 in 1,900
Ohio#258181 in 2,536
Alabama#262141 in 1,663
Minnesota#26291 in 2,206
Mississippi#28591 in 1,844
Indiana#30281 in 2,856
Georgia#306121 in 2,418
Tennessee#31591 in 2,382
Kansas#32251 in 2,671
Louisiana#32881 in 2,103
Michigan#32881 in 3,478
West Virginia#36151 in 2,959
Oklahoma#37061 in 2,801
California#39451 in 3,729
Texas#58791 in 4,791
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Idaho———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Hannah
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 4 spots since 2024 (#52 → #56)
  • 17 spots since 2020 (#39 → #56)
  • 28 spots since 2015 (#28 → #56)
  • Biggest jump: 174 spots in 1972 (#793 → #619)
  • Biggest drop: 86 spots in 1955 (#748 → #834)
Rise & fade · girls
120 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2000 at #2 (23,087 births)
  • Births halved by 2008, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 13 yrs
  • Top 10: 13 yrs · run 1995–2007
  • Top 100: 41 yrs · run 1986–2025
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 79
  • Highest: 1 in 79 girls born in 2000 were named Hannah (1.3%)
  • Latest: 1 in 405 girls born in 2025 (0.25%)
Era · girls
The 1990s
  • 34.1% of all girls named Hannah (158,818) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #96 (1880) → #926 (1967) → #2 (2000)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,480#96 (1880)#111
1890s3,021#128 (1891)#144
1900s2,605#169 (1900)#191
1910s4,465#213 (1910)#251
1920s3,811#295 (1921)#346
1930s2,126#414 (1930)#450
1940s1,777#504 (1940)#574
1950s1,447#664 (1950)#796
1960s1,369#859 (1968)#887
1970s4,544#253 (1979)#502
1980s32,702#42 (1989)#120
1990s158,818#2 (1999)#15
2000s155,784#2 (2000)#8
2010s64,506#20 (2010)#28
2020s26,230#39 (2020)#48

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Hannah in 1915

girls
#253
546 births · 1 in 1,802 girls

Top girls' names in 1915

  1. #1Mary58,187
  2. #2Helen30,866
  3. #3Dorothy25,154
  4. #4Margaret23,054
  5. #5Ruth21,878
  6. #6Mildred15,254
  7. #7Anna15,119
  8. #8Elizabeth14,103
  9. #9Frances12,786
  10. #10Evelyn11,595
  11. #253Hannah546
More about 1915

girls

983,852 girls got a published name in 1915; 1 in 1,802 of them was named Hannah, which outranked 94.9% of the 4,967 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Hannah
  1. #249Laverne564
  2. #251Iris563
  3. #252Leah552
  4. #253Hannah546
  5. #254Johnnie545
  6. #255Lenora543
  7. #256Edythe542
Biggest movers since 1914
Risers
  1. ↑ 500Gerda#1,444 → #944
  2. ↑ 451Theda#1,034 → #583
  3. ↑ 441Dominga#1,385 → #944
  4. ↑ 354Vernon#1,344 → #990
  5. ↑ 308Loyce#1,147 → #839
Fallers
  1. ↓ 383Drusilla#956 → #1,339
  2. ↓ 342Rossie#798 → #1,140
  3. ↓ 335Arlie#855 → #1,190
  4. ↓ 329Orene#956 → #1,285
  5. ↓ 329Margot#988 → #1,317

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1915 →