Hannah

#56 for girls in 2025, 3,973 births · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #9,823
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2000 · 23,087 births
Debut · girls
221 births
In top 100 · girls
41 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
465,685
since 1880

Hannah over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201926peak #2, 2000girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#563,973—
2024#524,078—
2023#484,127—
2022#474,490#9,8237
2021#444,590#12,1465
2020#394,972#10,6056
2019#325,644#10,8036
2018#335,680#12,1565
2017#325,934#10,7756
2016#336,038—
2015#286,434#8,0409
2014#286,593#12,1085
2013#237,307#8,1189
2012#227,293#9,7097
2011#256,584#10,8086
2010#206,999#8,8038
2009#237,584#6,43613
2008#179,577#6,76312
2007#913,323#5,21017
2006#814,556#6,09413
2005#714,854#5,87513
2004#515,614#1,384103
2003#417,638#3,62624
2002#318,828#3,34926
2001#320,723#3,72122
2000#223,087#3,29925
1999#221,679#3,10326
1998#221,376#3,48621
1997#520,597#3,73818
1996#718,596#3,29321
1995#717,018#3,10022
1994#1614,494#3,59618
1993#2112,510#3,36819
1992#2611,496#4,56412
1991#2910,769#2,82823
1990#3010,283#2,37329
1989#427,830#1,67846
1988#615,562#2,59922
1987#664,594#2,21526
1986#823,388#3,65312
1985#1172,449#4,6988
1984#1262,265#3,10714
1983#1242,398#3,41112
1982#1751,581#5,0037
1981#1901,414—
1980#2131,221#4,9407
1979#253970#5,3556
1978#312735—
1977#348632—
1976#384536—
1975#443444—
1974#518324—
1973#550301—
1972#619251—
1971#793179—
1970#803172—
1969#881142—
1968#859142—
1967#926122—
1966#869133—
1965#908123—
1964#890136—
1963#865146—
1962#885142—
1961#869150—
1960#920133—
1959#891136—
1958#925124—
1957#924123—
1956#838141—
1955#834135—
1954#748153—
1953#733154—
1952#723151—
1951#680165—
1950#664165—
1949#636170—
1948#610183—
1947#617184—
1946#662144—
1945#589153—
1944#565166—
1943#537195—
1942#510214—
1941#513180—
1940#504188—
1939#458212—
1938#472197—
1937#463199—
1936#489174—
1935#448208—
1934#424239—
1933#461202—
1932#432231—
1931#441213—
1930#414251—
1929#416255—
1928#410273—
1927#367348—
1926#351360—
1925#345381—
1924#348381—
1923#310434—
1922#321412—
1921#295496—
1920#299471—
1919#276534#4,1685
1918#279513—
1917#267541—
1916#260549—
1915#253546—
1914#249443—
1913#243396—
1912#237359—
1911#235279—
1910#213305—
1909#206278—
1908#223240—
1907#211239—
1906#191256—
1905#205219—
1904#182261—
1903#183250—
1902#174271—
1901#170266—
1900#169325—
1899#157288—
1898#148338—
1897#158288—
1896#146323—
1895#148301—
1894#150293—
1893#136304—
1892#132326—
1891#128293—
1890#136267—
1889#127301—
1888#123295—
1887#109279—
1886#116254—
1885#113236—
1884#103275—
1883#110209—
1882#106214—
1881#103196—
1880#96221—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Hannah was already there! It came in at #96, and was given to 221 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1948–1971, when fewer than 190 girls a year got the name.

Where Hannah is popular in 1926

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedAKMaine: #220 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,299 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedMNIllinois: #300 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 3,134 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedWIMichigan: #370 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 4,549 girlsMINew York: #274 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 2,899 girlsNYMassachusetts: #240 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,892 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedIAIndiana: #407 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,226 girlsINOhio: #465 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 7,760 girlsOHPennsylvania: #243 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 2,473 girlsPANew Jersey: #207 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,793 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedCONebraska: #259 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,886 girlsNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedMOKentucky: #318 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,592 girlsKYWest Virginia: #291 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,218 girlsWVVirginia: #236 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,736 girlsVAMaryland: #229 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,934 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedARTennessee: #266 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,940 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #261 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 2,021 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #169 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 954 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Hannah, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #419 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,573 girlsOKLouisiana: #410 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,403 girlsLAMississippi: #240 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,395 girlsMSAlabama: #388 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 3,613 girlsALGeorgia: #347 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,172 girlsGAHawaii: #97 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 294 girlsHITexas: #776 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 8,542 girlsTXFlorida: #382 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,348 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Hawaii#97 · 1 in 294
  2. South Carolina#169 · 1 in 954
  3. New Jersey#207 · 1 in 1,793
  4. Maine#220 · 1 in 1,299
  5. Maryland#229 · 1 in 1,934

Best ever in a state: #1 in Kentucky, 1996.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Hawaii#97121 in 294
South Carolina#169231 in 954
New Jersey#207171 in 1,793
Maine#22051 in 1,299
Maryland#22971 in 1,934
Virginia#236151 in 1,736
Massachusetts#240121 in 2,892
Mississippi#240171 in 1,395
Pennsylvania#243371 in 2,473
Nebraska#25961 in 1,886
North Carolina#261191 in 2,021
Tennessee#266141 in 1,940
New York#274341 in 2,899
West Virginia#29191 in 2,218
Illinois#300191 in 3,134
Kentucky#318111 in 2,592
Georgia#347101 in 3,172
Michigan#37091 in 4,549
Florida#38251 in 3,348
Alabama#38891 in 3,613
Indiana#40751 in 5,226
Louisiana#41071 in 3,403
Oklahoma#41971 in 3,573
Ohio#46571 in 7,760
Texas#77671 in 8,542
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Hannah
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 4 spots since 2024 (#52 → #56)
  • 17 spots since 2020 (#39 → #56)
  • 28 spots since 2015 (#28 → #56)
  • Biggest jump: 174 spots in 1972 (#793 → #619)
  • Biggest drop: 86 spots in 1955 (#748 → #834)
Rise & fade · girls
120 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2000 at #2 (23,087 births)
  • Births halved by 2008, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 13 yrs
  • Top 10: 13 yrs · run 1995–2007
  • Top 100: 41 yrs · run 1986–2025
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 79
  • Highest: 1 in 79 girls born in 2000 were named Hannah (1.3%)
  • Latest: 1 in 405 girls born in 2025 (0.25%)
Era · girls
The 1990s
  • 34.1% of all girls named Hannah (158,818) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #96 (1880) → #926 (1967) → #2 (2000)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,480#96 (1880)#111
1890s3,021#128 (1891)#144
1900s2,605#169 (1900)#191
1910s4,465#213 (1910)#251
1920s3,811#295 (1921)#346
1930s2,126#414 (1930)#450
1940s1,777#504 (1940)#574
1950s1,447#664 (1950)#796
1960s1,369#859 (1968)#887
1970s4,544#253 (1979)#502
1980s32,702#42 (1989)#120
1990s158,818#2 (1999)#15
2000s155,784#2 (2000)#8
2010s64,506#20 (2010)#28
2020s26,230#39 (2020)#48

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Hannah in 1926

girls
#351
360 births · 1 in 3,293 girls

Top girls' names in 1926

  1. #1Mary67,832
  2. #2Dorothy36,618
  3. #3Betty32,964
  4. #4Helen26,886
  5. #5Margaret23,072
  6. #6Ruth20,225
  7. #7Doris16,295
  8. #8Virginia16,161
  9. #9Mildred13,547
  10. #10Frances13,355
  11. #351Hannah360
More about 1926

girls

1,185,401 girls got a published name in 1926; 1 in 3,293 of them was named Hannah, which outranked 93.8% of the 5,622 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Hannah
  1. #347Mona369
  2. #347Robert369
  3. #350Bernadette368
  4. #351Hannah360
  5. #352Corrine358
  6. #352James358
  7. #354Zelma356
Biggest movers since 1925
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,047Janell#1,795 → #748
  2. ↑ 389Madalyn#1,225 → #836
  3. ↑ 382Evangelina#1,324 → #942
  4. ↑ 379Carla#1,252 → #873
  5. ↑ 351Vilma#1,020 → #669
Fallers
  1. ↓ 597Albertine#944 → #1,541
  2. ↓ 462Cleora#895 → #1,357
  3. ↓ 461Lorrayne#988 → #1,449
  4. ↓ 453Hermina#996 → #1,449
  5. ↓ 307Ethelene#913 → #1,220

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1926 →