Harold
Last seen for girls in 2004 at #14,179 · #991 for boys in 2025, 230 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1921 · 13,811 births
- Debut · boys
- 113 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 83 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 551,632since 1880
Harold over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #991 | 230 | |
| 2024 | — | #988 | 227 | |
| 2023 | — | #914 | 253 | |
| 2022 | — | #923 | 250 | |
| 2021 | — | #954 | 236 | |
| 2020 | — | #932 | 238 | |
| 2019 | — | #815 | 279 | |
| 2018 | — | #796 | 284 | |
| 2017 | — | #798 | 286 | |
| 2016 | — | #802 | 288 | |
| 2015 | — | #808 | 283 | |
| 2014 | — | #829 | 272 | |
| 2013 | — | #889 | 234 | |
| 2012 | — | #836 | 261 | |
| 2011 | — | #841 | 256 | |
| 2010 | — | #744 | 305 | |
| 2009 | — | #825 | 266 | |
| 2008 | — | #733 | 312 | |
| 2007 | — | #680 | 350 | |
| 2006 | — | #650 | 356 | |
| 2005 | — | #627 | 349 | |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #613 | 350 |
| 2003 | — | #609 | 343 | |
| 2002 | — | #588 | 363 | |
| 2001 | — | #556 | 377 | |
| 2000 | — | #538 | 406 | |
| 1999 | — | #514 | 413 | |
| 1998 | — | #514 | 406 | |
| 1997 | — | #490 | 435 | |
| 1996 | — | #440 | 508 | |
| 1995 | — | #441 | 519 | |
| 1994 | — | #440 | 517 | |
| 1993 | — | #381 | 602 | |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | #355 | 664 |
| 1991 | — | #355 | 683 | |
| 1990 | — | #324 | 771 | |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | #305 | 783 |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #290 | 801 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | #272 | 805 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #270 | 803 |
| 1985 | #5,678 | 12 | #259 | 857 |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #253 | 861 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #239 | 940 |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | #225 | 1,043 |
| 1981 | #4,963 | 14 | #222 | 1,101 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | #207 | 1,189 |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | #195 | 1,246 |
| 1978 | #4,931 | 13 | #190 | 1,243 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #167 | 1,434 |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | #162 | 1,440 |
| 1975 | #3,637 | 18 | #153 | 1,587 |
| 1974 | #4,720 | 12 | #146 | 1,677 |
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | #140 | 1,812 |
| 1972 | #3,062 | 21 | #132 | 2,035 |
| 1971 | #2,874 | 24 | #130 | 2,387 |
| 1970 | #3,208 | 20 | #122 | 2,726 |
| 1969 | #3,102 | 19 | #117 | 2,763 |
| 1968 | #2,874 | 20 | #108 | 2,835 |
| 1967 | #2,868 | 19 | #104 | 2,956 |
| 1966 | #3,400 | 14 | #99 | 3,323 |
| 1965 | #2,204 | 29 | #99 | 3,539 |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 | #98 | 3,875 |
| 1963 | #3,176 | 16 | #96 | 4,093 |
| 1962 | #3,438 | 14 | #95 | 4,233 |
| 1961 | #2,543 | 23 | #94 | 4,448 |
| 1960 | #2,246 | 27 | #92 | 4,679 |
| 1959 | #2,395 | 23 | #87 | 4,943 |
| 1958 | #3,085 | 15 | #84 | 5,149 |
| 1957 | #2,067 | 28 | #74 | 5,752 |
| 1956 | #2,249 | 24 | #72 | 5,955 |
| 1955 | #1,978 | 29 | #63 | 6,096 |
| 1954 | #2,240 | 23 | #60 | 6,359 |
| 1953 | #2,071 | 25 | #56 | 6,580 |
| 1952 | #2,411 | 19 | #51 | 6,957 |
| 1951 | #2,694 | 15 | #46 | 7,178 |
| 1950 | #2,053 | 22 | #45 | 7,214 |
| 1949 | #2,212 | 20 | #42 | 7,817 |
| 1948 | #1,953 | 24 | #36 | 8,144 |
| 1947 | #1,946 | 25 | #35 | 8,904 |
| 1946 | #1,481 | 35 | #33 | 8,373 |
| 1945 | #1,743 | 23 | #28 | 7,524 |
| 1944 | #1,545 | 28 | #27 | 7,980 |
| 1943 | #1,703 | 25 | #27 | 8,670 |
| 1942 | #1,630 | 26 | #27 | 8,582 |
| 1941 | #1,294 | 35 | #24 | 8,102 |
| 1940 | #1,242 | 35 | #23 | 8,080 |
| 1939 | #1,514 | 25 | #23 | 8,299 |
| 1938 | #1,343 | 30 | #23 | 8,563 |
| 1937 | #1,196 | 36 | #21 | 8,550 |
| 1936 | #1,375 | 28 | #21 | 8,628 |
| 1935 | #1,073 | 42 | #20 | 9,170 |
| 1934 | #1,166 | 37 | #18 | 9,926 |
| 1933 | #1,102 | 40 | #18 | 9,543 |
| 1932 | #899 | 61 | #18 | 10,433 |
| 1931 | #862 | 64 | #18 | 10,695 |
| 1930 | #867 | 68 | #18 | 11,660 |
| 1929 | #706 | 98 | #16 | 11,677 |
| 1928 | #742 | 91 | #14 | 12,670 |
| 1927 | #723 | 99 | #14 | 13,226 |
| 1926 | #757 | 91 | #14 | 13,310 |
| 1925 | #794 | 86 | #14 | 13,597 |
| 1924 | #829 | 81 | #13 | 14,149 |
| 1923 | #976 | 58 | #13 | 13,874 |
| 1922 | #939 | 62 | #13 | 13,593 |
| 1921 | #853 | 75 | #12 | 13,811 |
| 1920 | #894 | 66 | #12 | 13,678 |
| 1919 | #831 | 71 | #13 | 12,021 |
| 1918 | #1,018 | 50 | #13 | 12,185 |
| 1917 | #888 | 61 | #12 | 11,194 |
| 1916 | #1,210 | 35 | #13 | 10,698 |
| 1915 | #1,000 | 44 | #12 | 10,444 |
| 1914 | #956 | 38 | #14 | 7,563 |
| 1913 | #1,091 | 25 | #13 | 6,157 |
| 1912 | #1,178 | 20 | #13 | 5,102 |
| 1911 | #1,450 | 11 | #16 | 2,448 |
| 1910 | #1,335 | 12 | #18 | 1,909 |
| 1909 | #1,369 | 10 | #16 | 1,725 |
| 1908 | #1,439 | 9 | #17 | 1,542 |
| 1907 | #1,639 | 7 | #17 | 1,452 |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | #17 | 1,330 |
| 1905 | #1,420 | 8 | #20 | 1,258 |
| 1904 | — | #20 | 1,186 | |
| 1903 | — | #20 | 1,065 | |
| 1902 | #1,594 | 6 | #19 | 1,077 |
| 1901 | — | #21 | 915 | |
| 1900 | #1,561 | 7 | #20 | 1,245 |
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | #19 | 914 |
| 1898 | — | #22 | 963 | |
| 1897 | #1,167 | 8 | #21 | 860 |
| 1896 | #1,416 | 6 | #23 | 862 |
| 1895 | #1,123 | 9 | #29 | 753 |
| 1894 | — | #32 | 690 | |
| 1893 | #1,277 | 6 | #34 | 566 |
| 1892 | — | #37 | 583 | |
| 1891 | — | #42 | 419 | |
| 1890 | — | #46 | 408 | |
| 1889 | — | #57 | 340 | |
| 1888 | — | #69 | 298 | |
| 1887 | — | #61 | 279 | |
| 1886 | — | #78 | 224 | |
| 1885 | — | #82 | 201 | |
| 1884 | — | #85 | 191 | |
| 1883 | — | #117 | 108 | |
| 1882 | — | #115 | 127 | |
| 1881 | — | #106 | 120 | |
| 1880 | — | #116 | 113 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Harold was already there! It came in at #116, and was given to 113 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 130 boys a year got the name.
Where Harold is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Iowa#5 · 1 in 38
- Kansas#6 · 1 in 42
- South Dakota#6 · 1 in 43
- Nebraska#6 · 1 in 44
- Minnesota#6 · 1 in 44
Best ever in a state: #2 in Nebraska, 1913.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #5 | 471 | 1 in 38 |
| Kansas | #6 | 314 | 1 in 42 |
| Minnesota | #6 | 428 | 1 in 44 |
| Nebraska | #6 | 237 | 1 in 44 |
| North Dakota | #6 | 138 | 1 in 48 |
| South Dakota | #6 | 120 | 1 in 43 |
| Idaho | #7 | 79 | 1 in 41 |
| Montana | #7 | 90 | 1 in 53 |
| Oregon | #7 | 115 | 1 in 39 |
| Indiana | #8 | 449 | 1 in 45 |
| Missouri | #8 | 442 | 1 in 56 |
| Wisconsin | #8 | 445 | 1 in 45 |
| Oklahoma | #9 | 203 | 1 in 77 |
| Washington | #9 | 152 | 1 in 49 |
| Colorado | #10 | 106 | 1 in 58 |
| Illinois | #11 | 870 | 1 in 57 |
| Maine | #12 | 88 | 1 in 54 |
| Michigan | #12 | 478 | 1 in 58 |
| Ohio | #12 | 729 | 1 in 56 |
| Utah | #12 | 55 | 1 in 72 |
| Vermont | #12 | 47 | 1 in 44 |
| West Virginia | #12 | 146 | 1 in 77 |
| New York | #13 | 1,202 | 1 in 67 |
| Delaware | #16 | 18 | 1 in 80 |
| Nevada | #16 | 6 | 1 in 48 |
| Wyoming | #16 | 18 | 1 in 57 |
| California | #18 | 225 | 1 in 80 |
| New Jersey | #18 | 300 | 1 in 81 |
| New Hampshire | #19 | 37 | 1 in 70 |
| Pennsylvania | #19 | 788 | 1 in 93 |
| Rhode Island | #19 | 53 | 1 in 78 |
| Kentucky | #22 | 153 | 1 in 129 |
| Massachusetts | #22 | 323 | 1 in 90 |
| Hawaii | #23 | 22 | 1 in 84 |
| Louisiana | #24 | 103 | 1 in 144 |
| South Carolina | #26 | 135 | 1 in 124 |
| Connecticut | #30 | 95 | 1 in 121 |
| Maryland | #30 | 70 | 1 in 146 |
| Arkansas | #31 | 89 | 1 in 154 |
| District of Columbia | #33 | 14 | 1 in 145 |
| Florida | #33 | 50 | 1 in 150 |
| Virginia | #34 | 102 | 1 in 181 |
| Texas | #35 | 201 | 1 in 190 |
| Tennessee | #39 | 92 | 1 in 203 |
| Georgia | #40 | 119 | 1 in 219 |
| New Mexico | #40 | 17 | 1 in 160 |
| North Carolina | #43 | 115 | 1 in 219 |
| Arizona | #45 | 15 | 1 in 163 |
| Alabama | #53 | 82 | 1 in 258 |
| Mississippi | #61 | 52 | 1 in 312 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Harold
- 3 spots since 2024 (#988 → #991)
- 59 spots since 2020 (#932 → #991)
- 183 spots since 2015 (#808 → #991)
- Biggest jump: 81 spots in 2010 (#825 → #744)
- Biggest drop: 117 spots in 2020 (#815 → #932)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1921 at #12 (13,811 births)
- Births halved by 1953, 32 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 83 yrs · run 1884–1966
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 78 boys born in 1920 were named Harold (1.3%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,426 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #12 in 1921, was only 1 in 80 (1.3%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 24.2% of all boys named Harold (133,585) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,001 | #57 (1889) | #89 |
| 1890s | 7,018 | #19 (1899) | #31 |
| 1900s | 12,795 | #16 (1909) | #19 |
| 1910s | 79,721 | #12 (1917) | #14 |
| 1920s | 133,585 | #12 (1921) | #14 |
| 1930s | 95,467 | #18 (1930) | #20 |
| 1940s | 82,176 | #23 (1940) | #30 |
| 1950s | 62,183 | #45 (1950) | #64 |
| 1960s | 36,744 | #92 (1960) | #100 |
| 1970s | 17,587 | #122 (1970) | #154 |
| 1980s | 9,183 | #207 (1980) | #254 |
| 1990s | 5,518 | #324 (1990) | #425 |
| 2000s | 3,472 | #538 (2000) | #642 |
| 2010s | 2,748 | #744 (2010) | #816 |
| 2020s | 1,434 | #914 (2023) | #950 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Harold in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 29,838 of them was named Harold, which outranked 76.6% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,189Selina36
- #1,189Shizue36
- #1,189Valera36
- #1,210Harold35
- #1,210Arie35
- #1,210Bettina35
- #1,210Casimira35
- #1,227Albertina34
- #1,227Aldine34
- #1,227Ana34
Tied with 16 names at #1,210; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 83 of them was named Harold, which outranked 99.7% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.