Harriet

#1,071 for girls in 2025, 226 births · Last seen for boys in 1956 at #3,942
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1880 · 319 births
Debut · girls
319 births
In top 100 · girls
10 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
90,306
since 1880

Harriet over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202016peak #73, 1880girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,071226—
2024#1,149210—
2023#1,129215—
2022#1,129218—
2021#1,056239—
2020#1,074230—
2019#988261—
2018#1,039248—
2017#1,165211—
2016#1,353175—
2015#1,307182—
2014#1,624132—
2013#1,646129—
2012#2,13289—
2011#2,17387—
2010#3,01056—
2009#3,08855—
2008#4,26836—
2007#2,93061—
2006#2,85061—
2005#3,40444—
2004#4,38731—
2003#3,34743—
2002#3,52338—
2001#3,19843—
2000#3,52737—
1999#3,56934—
1998#2,84646—
1997#3,71630—
1996#3,30235—
1995#3,15236—
1994#3,61530—
1993#3,87727—
1992#2,83042—
1991#3,54030—
1990#3,15635—
1989#2,65842—
1988#3,16531—
1987#2,61238—
1986#2,42041—
1985#2,22246—
1984#2,38240—
1983#2,09747—
1982#1,78661—
1981#2,06150—
1980#1,88657—
1979#2,11247—
1978#1,72960—
1977#1,60966—
1976#1,63860—
1975#1,38176—
1974#1,16597—
1973#1,33975—
1972#1,16992—
1971#1,098109—
1970#819169—
1969#832154—
1968#846145—
1967#635227—
1966#675207—
1965#559290—
1964#595278—
1963#518351—
1962#492387—
1961#468434—
1960#451470—
1959#418513—
1958#411512—
1957#386559—
1956#360590#3,9425
1955#327693—
1954#314721—
1953#293801—
1952#270882—
1951#251924—
1950#246934—
1949#2251,102—
1948#2191,116#3,6685
1947#2011,324—
1946#1901,299#2,9197
1945#1761,175—
1944#1691,263#3,1096
1943#1651,444—
1942#1621,443—
1941#1581,396—
1940#1571,363—
1939#1561,390—
1938#1581,375—
1937#1531,421#3,5185
1936#1541,332#2,8547
1935#1571,294—
1934#1561,280#3,2776
1933#1521,236—
1932#1491,351—
1931#1431,415—
1930#1381,598#3,0228
1929#1351,697#2,45211
1928#1331,785#2,8439
1927#1321,965#2,70310
1926#1331,986#3,7086
1925#1312,067—
1924#1282,189—
1923#1222,198#3,4677
1922#1172,237#4,3075
1921#1142,389#3,8696
1920#1122,360—
1919#1132,168—
1918#1062,345—
1917#1042,203—
1916#1062,067#2,9268
1915#1121,849—
1914#1111,455—
1913#1251,039—
1912#1131,043—
1911#115792—
1910#126637—
1909#135527#1,4405
1908#126548#1,3735
1907#138477—
1906#127497—
1905#144413—
1904#132448—
1903#134416—
1902#140399—
1901#123414—
1900#134461—
1899#113431—
1898#110491—
1897#128383—
1896#110437—
1895#113435—
1894#114411—
1893#105428—
1892#111402—
1891#111354—
1890#102399—
1889#99397—
1888#99389—
1887#94342—
1886#99341—
1885#89342—
1884#91339—
1883#82341—
1882#90289—
1881#85270—
1880#73319—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Harriet was already there! It came in at #73, and was given to 319 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1993–1997, when fewer than 37 girls a year got the name.

Where Harriet is popular in 2016

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNHWashington: #1,100 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,429 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #385 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,636 girlsMNIllinois: #1,307 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 8,232 girlsILWisconsin: #746 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,884 girlsWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMINew York: #1,087 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 6,417 girlsNYMassachusetts: #844 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,095 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedSDIowa: #594 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,600 girlsIAIndiana: #1,058 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,059 girlsINOhio: #765 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 4,339 girlsOHPennsylvania: #1,415 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 10,371 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,899 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 16,977 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedVAMaryland: #894 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,808 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #913 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 5,034 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedHITexas: #1,354 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 9,294 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Harriet, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Minnesota#385 · 1 in 1,636
  2. Iowa#594 · 1 in 2,600
  3. Wisconsin#746 · 1 in 3,884
  4. Ohio#765 · 1 in 4,339
  5. Massachusetts#844 · 1 in 5,095

Best ever in a state: #23 in Hawaii, 1911.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Minnesota#385151 in 1,636
Iowa#59451 in 2,600
Wisconsin#74661 in 3,884
Ohio#765121 in 4,339
Massachusetts#84451 in 5,095
Maryland#89451 in 4,808
North Carolina#91391 in 5,034
Indiana#1,05851 in 6,059
New York#1,087141 in 6,417
Washington#1,10051 in 6,429
Illinois#1,30771 in 8,232
Texas#1,354181 in 9,294
Pennsylvania#1,41551 in 10,371
California#1,899121 in 16,977
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Michigan———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Harriet
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 78 spots since 2024 (#1,149 → #1,071)
  • 3 spots since 2020 (#1,074 → #1,071)
  • 236 spots since 2015 (#1,307 → #1,071)
  • Biggest jump: 51 spots in 2019 (#1,039 → #988)
  • Biggest drop: 279 spots in 1971 (#819 → #1,098)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1880 at #73 (319 births)
  • Births halved by 1968, 88 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 10 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 10 yrs · run 1880–1889
  • Top 1,000: 92 yrs · run 1880–1970
Share of babies · girls
1 in 285
  • Highest: 1 in 285 girls born in 1880 were named Harriet (0.35%)
  • Latest: 1 in 7,112 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 23.1% of all girls named Harriet (20,873) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s3,369#73 (1880)#90
1890s4,171#102 (1890)#112
1900s4,600#123 (1901)#133
1910s15,598#104 (1917)#113
1920s20,873#112 (1920)#126
1930s13,692#138 (1930)#152
1940s12,925#157 (1940)#182
1950s7,129#246 (1950)#328
1960s2,943#451 (1960)#607
1970s851#819 (1970)#1,406
1980s453#1,786 (1982)#2,329
1990s345#2,830 (1992)#3,360
2000s449#2,850 (2006)#3,452
2010s1,570#988 (2019)#1,644
2020s1,338#1,056 (2021)#1,101

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Harriet in 2016

girls
#1,353
175 births · 1 in 10,126 girls

Top girls' names in 2016

  1. #1Emma19,550
  2. #2Olivia19,414
  3. #3Ava16,354
  4. #4Sophia16,185
  5. #5Isabella14,863
  6. #6Mia14,464
  7. #7Charlotte13,118
  8. #8Abigail11,796
  9. #9Emily11,006
  10. #10Amelia10,809
  11. #1,353Harriet175
More about 2016

girls

1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 10,126 of them was named Harriet, which outranked 92.8% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Harriet
  1. #1,345Reece176
  2. #1,345Reya176
  3. #1,345Skylynn176
  4. #1,353Harriet175
  5. #1,353Anita175
  6. #1,353Audra175
  7. #1,353Destinee175
  8. #1,358Alessa174
  9. #1,358Ariadna174
  10. #1,358Emi174

Tied with 4 names at #1,353; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2015
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,389Kehlani#3,254 → #865
  2. ↑ 612Royalty#1,146 → #534
  3. ↑ 481Saoirse#1,448 → #967
  4. ↑ 396Ophelia#978 → #582
  5. ↑ 364Aitana#915 → #551
Fallers
  1. ↓ 542Caitlin#610 → #1,152
  2. ↓ 451Caitlyn#598 → #1,049
  3. ↓ 397Katelynn#652 → #1,049
  4. ↓ 382Kaitlynn#989 → #1,371
  5. ↓ 340Neriah#946 → #1,286

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2016 →