Hattie
- #334 for girls in 2025, 923 births
- Last seen for boys in 1959 at #3,988
- Given to girls 99.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1880 · 769 births
- Debut · girls
- 769 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 35 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 105,197since 1880
Hattie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #334 | 923 | — | |
| 2024 | #383 | 820 | — | |
| 2023 | #384 | 804 | — | |
| 2022 | #412 | 763 | — | |
| 2021 | #459 | 684 | — | |
| 2020 | #421 | 725 | — | |
| 2019 | #451 | 691 | — | |
| 2018 | #495 | 628 | — | |
| 2017 | #477 | 654 | — | |
| 2016 | #505 | 620 | — | |
| 2015 | #488 | 657 | — | |
| 2014 | #590 | 502 | — | |
| 2013 | #568 | 510 | — | |
| 2012 | #706 | 398 | — | |
| 2011 | #994 | 255 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,438 | 158 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,769 | 123 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,531 | 151 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,588 | 142 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,639 | 129 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,645 | 121 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,756 | 109 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,552 | 124 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,510 | 125 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,468 | 128 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,518 | 120 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,688 | 97 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,587 | 103 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,845 | 80 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,503 | 107 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,101 | 64 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,862 | 76 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,176 | 61 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,987 | 69 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,832 | 77 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,201 | 58 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,998 | 63 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,839 | 67 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,962 | 57 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,932 | 57 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,975 | 55 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,788 | 60 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,858 | 56 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,551 | 76 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,528 | 78 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,542 | 76 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,712 | 64 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,546 | 71 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,761 | 58 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,523 | 67 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,447 | 71 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,260 | 86 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,293 | 79 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,192 | 90 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,187 | 96 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,191 | 96 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,024 | 113 | — | |
| 1968 | #991 | 111 | — | |
| 1967 | #967 | 112 | — | |
| 1966 | #890 | 127 | — | |
| 1965 | #771 | 165 | — | |
| 1964 | #780 | 175 | — | |
| 1963 | #695 | 212 | — | |
| 1962 | #661 | 236 | — | |
| 1961 | #655 | 245 | — | |
| 1960 | #584 | 287 | — | |
| 1959 | #577 | 291 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #556 | 308 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #529 | 327 | — | |
| 1956 | #474 | 390 | — | |
| 1955 | #432 | 421 | — | |
| 1954 | #415 | 436 | — | |
| 1953 | #381 | 504 | #3,798 | 5 |
| 1952 | #349 | 554 | — | |
| 1951 | #330 | 576 | — | |
| 1950 | #306 | 643 | — | |
| 1949 | #287 | 723 | #3,690 | 5 |
| 1948 | #278 | 754 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #275 | 779 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #266 | 739 | — | |
| 1945 | #247 | 744 | — | |
| 1944 | #239 | 754 | #2,862 | 7 |
| 1943 | #236 | 821 | #2,964 | 7 |
| 1942 | #242 | 785 | #1,946 | 14 |
| 1941 | #208 | 853 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #198 | 893 | #3,130 | 6 |
| 1939 | #195 | 912 | #2,288 | 10 |
| 1938 | #198 | 919 | #2,868 | 7 |
| 1937 | #193 | 931 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #192 | 938 | #2,301 | 10 |
| 1935 | #182 | 976 | #1,929 | 14 |
| 1934 | #175 | 1,067 | #2,121 | 12 |
| 1933 | #167 | 1,086 | #2,542 | 9 |
| 1932 | #178 | 1,059 | #2,638 | 9 |
| 1931 | #175 | 1,057 | #2,101 | 13 |
| 1930 | #160 | 1,284 | #2,444 | 11 |
| 1929 | #164 | 1,261 | #2,766 | 9 |
| 1928 | #159 | 1,375 | #2,659 | 10 |
| 1927 | #156 | 1,508 | #2,193 | 14 |
| 1926 | #151 | 1,601 | #2,186 | 14 |
| 1925 | #148 | 1,738 | #3,408 | 7 |
| 1924 | #149 | 1,759 | #2,822 | 10 |
| 1923 | #147 | 1,700 | #3,175 | 8 |
| 1922 | #139 | 1,780 | #2,630 | 11 |
| 1921 | #144 | 1,776 | #3,214 | 8 |
| 1920 | #132 | 1,870 | #2,231 | 14 |
| 1919 | #125 | 1,896 | #2,063 | 15 |
| 1918 | #121 | 1,999 | #3,368 | 7 |
| 1917 | #118 | 1,858 | #2,091 | 14 |
| 1916 | #115 | 1,889 | — | |
| 1915 | #113 | 1,825 | #2,621 | 9 |
| 1914 | #97 | 1,678 | #2,457 | 8 |
| 1913 | #96 | 1,434 | — | |
| 1912 | #90 | 1,389 | #1,746 | 9 |
| 1911 | #86 | 1,136 | #1,387 | 7 |
| 1910 | #73 | 1,314 | — | |
| 1909 | #75 | 1,134 | — | |
| 1908 | #71 | 1,137 | #1,217 | 6 |
| 1907 | #71 | 1,142 | #999 | 8 |
| 1906 | #71 | 1,056 | #927 | 8 |
| 1905 | #62 | 1,197 | #919 | 8 |
| 1904 | #64 | 1,123 | #1,205 | 5 |
| 1903 | #60 | 1,106 | #910 | 7 |
| 1902 | #57 | 1,163 | #1,013 | 6 |
| 1901 | #56 | 1,106 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #50 | 1,553 | #1,050 | 7 |
| 1899 | #53 | 1,087 | #661 | 10 |
| 1898 | #48 | 1,328 | #744 | 9 |
| 1897 | #48 | 1,251 | #1,057 | 5 |
| 1896 | #47 | 1,320 | — | |
| 1895 | #46 | 1,338 | #795 | 8 |
| 1894 | #44 | 1,325 | #954 | 6 |
| 1893 | #43 | 1,315 | #615 | 11 |
| 1892 | #40 | 1,363 | #861 | 7 |
| 1891 | #41 | 1,219 | #700 | 8 |
| 1890 | #38 | 1,363 | #739 | 8 |
| 1889 | #35 | 1,328 | — | |
| 1888 | #36 | 1,298 | — | |
| 1887 | #32 | 1,135 | #819 | 6 |
| 1886 | #33 | 1,139 | #959 | 5 |
| 1885 | #36 | 1,008 | — | |
| 1884 | #32 | 993 | — | |
| 1883 | #28 | 895 | — | |
| 1882 | #30 | 859 | — | |
| 1881 | #28 | 775 | — | |
| 1880 | #27 | 769 | #809 | 6 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Hattie was already there! It came in at #27, and was given to 769 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1975–1995, when fewer than 79 girls a year got the name.
Where Hattie is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- North Dakota#26 · 1 in 135
- Nebraska#95 · 1 in 338
- Arkansas#96 · 1 in 378
- South Dakota#97 · 1 in 305
- Kentucky#102 · 1 in 421
Best ever in a state: #11 in Mississippi, 1912.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #26 | 20 | 1 in 135 |
| Nebraska | #95 | 21 | 1 in 338 |
| Arkansas | #96 | 28 | 1 in 378 |
| South Dakota | #97 | 10 | 1 in 305 |
| Kentucky | #102 | 41 | 1 in 421 |
| Montana | #105 | 9 | 1 in 314 |
| Mississippi | #114 | 20 | 1 in 445 |
| Tennessee | #122 | 60 | 1 in 535 |
| West Virginia | #124 | 12 | 1 in 423 |
| Kansas | #130 | 24 | 1 in 492 |
| Iowa | #138 | 23 | 1 in 512 |
| Alabama | #151 | 28 | 1 in 654 |
| Oklahoma | #151 | 25 | 1 in 591 |
| Wisconsin | #159 | 33 | 1 in 614 |
| Missouri | #178 | 34 | 1 in 715 |
| Louisiana | #212 | 20 | 1 in 818 |
| Minnesota | #221 | 25 | 1 in 859 |
| Utah | #223 | 21 | 1 in 813 |
| Indiana | #226 | 31 | 1 in 900 |
| Idaho | #244 | 9 | 1 in 796 |
| South Carolina | #244 | 20 | 1 in 915 |
| Georgia | #257 | 40 | 1 in 1,130 |
| North Carolina | #273 | 40 | 1 in 1,162 |
| Texas | #346 | 99 | 1 in 1,622 |
| Oregon | #353 | 10 | 1 in 1,305 |
| Colorado | #370 | 16 | 1 in 1,458 |
| Virginia | #376 | 21 | 1 in 1,607 |
| Ohio | #430 | 26 | 1 in 1,818 |
| Michigan | #438 | 19 | 1 in 1,881 |
| Illinois | #471 | 22 | 1 in 2,015 |
| Pennsylvania | #558 | 19 | 1 in 2,457 |
| Washington | #679 | 9 | 1 in 3,207 |
| Massachusetts | #761 | 6 | 1 in 4,005 |
| Arizona | #909 | 6 | 1 in 4,703 |
| Florida | #959 | 16 | 1 in 5,423 |
| California | #1,111 | 23 | 1 in 7,031 |
| New York | #1,235 | 11 | 1 in 7,121 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Hattie
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 87 spots since 2020 (#421 → #334)
- Biggest jump: 444 spots in 2011
- Biggest drop: 119 spots in 1966
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #27 (769 births)
- Births halved by 1957, 77 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 35 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 35 yrs · run 1880–1914
- Top 1,000: 104 yrs · run 1880–1968
Share of babies · girls
1 in 118
- Highest: 1 in 118 girls born in 1880 were named Hattie (0.85%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,741 girls born in 2025 (0.06%)
Era · girls
The 1910s
- 15.6% of all girls named Hattie (16,418) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 10,199 | #27 (1880) | #32 |
| 1890s | 12,909 | #38 (1890) | #45 |
| 1900s | 11,717 | #50 (1900) | #64 |
| 1910s | 16,418 | #73 (1910) | #103 |
| 1920s | 16,368 | #132 (1920) | #149 |
| 1930s | 10,229 | #160 (1930) | #182 |
| 1940s | 7,845 | #198 (1940) | #248 |
| 1950s | 4,450 | #306 (1950) | #435 |
| 1960s | 1,783 | #584 (1960) | #802 |
| 1970s | 778 | #1,187 (1971) | #1,411 |
| 1980s | 645 | #1,528 (1981) | #1,797 |
| 1990s | 792 | #1,503 (1996) | #1,878 |
| 2000s | 1,272 | #1,468 (2001) | #1,598 |
| 2010s | 5,073 | #451 (2019) | #671 |
| 2020s | 4,719 | #334 (2025) | #399 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Hattie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: