Helen
#461 for girls in 2025, 668 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1918 · 36,148 births
- Debut · girls
- 636 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 79 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,024,202since 1880
Helen over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #461 | 668 | — | |
| 2024 | #425 | 728 | — | |
| 2023 | #395 | 777 | — | |
| 2022 | #422 | 749 | — | |
| 2021 | #443 | 704 | — | |
| 2020 | #426 | 721 | — | |
| 2019 | #428 | 743 | — | |
| 2018 | #415 | 745 | — | |
| 2017 | #418 | 764 | — | |
| 2016 | #409 | 816 | — | |
| 2015 | #419 | 767 | — | |
| 2014 | #403 | 802 | — | |
| 2013 | #411 | 740 | — | |
| 2012 | #403 | 772 | — | |
| 2011 | #429 | 731 | — | |
| 2010 | #436 | 705 | — | |
| 2009 | #388 | 826 | — | |
| 2008 | #368 | 885 | — | |
| 2007 | #349 | 932 | — | |
| 2006 | #348 | 949 | — | |
| 2005 | #333 | 961 | — | |
| 2004 | #364 | 861 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #392 | 783 | — | |
| 2002 | #341 | 875 | — | |
| 2001 | #344 | 884 | — | |
| 2000 | #345 | 891 | — | |
| 1999 | #356 | 841 | — | |
| 1998 | #348 | 832 | — | |
| 1997 | #345 | 812 | — | |
| 1996 | #312 | 900 | — | |
| 1995 | #325 | 837 | — | |
| 1994 | #321 | 849 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | #307 | 867 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #326 | 828 | — | |
| 1991 | #340 | 774 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #316 | 863 | #6,415 | 7 |
| 1989 | #305 | 858 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #321 | 774 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #297 | 816 | — | |
| 1986 | #311 | 766 | #5,926 | 6 |
| 1985 | #301 | 808 | #5,785 | 6 |
| 1984 | #281 | 858 | #4,973 | 7 |
| 1983 | #278 | 844 | — | |
| 1982 | #279 | 876 | — | |
| 1981 | #275 | 899 | — | |
| 1980 | #272 | 914 | — | |
| 1979 | #278 | 879 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #255 | 925 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #249 | 994 | #5,123 | 6 |
| 1976 | #250 | 943 | #3,724 | 9 |
| 1975 | #229 | 1,059 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #225 | 1,140 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #221 | 1,137 | — | |
| 1972 | #225 | 1,241 | #3,344 | 9 |
| 1971 | #209 | 1,440 | #3,370 | 9 |
| 1970 | #191 | 1,718 | #3,282 | 9 |
| 1969 | #175 | 1,858 | #2,861 | 10 |
| 1968 | #173 | 1,884 | #2,445 | 12 |
| 1967 | #158 | 2,157 | #2,985 | 8 |
| 1966 | #144 | 2,447 | #3,948 | 5 |
| 1965 | #137 | 2,800 | #2,178 | 14 |
| 1964 | #132 | 3,100 | #2,854 | 9 |
| 1963 | #124 | 3,338 | #2,858 | 9 |
| 1962 | #128 | 3,586 | #2,035 | 16 |
| 1961 | #119 | 3,858 | #2,409 | 12 |
| 1960 | #117 | 4,071 | #2,685 | 10 |
| 1959 | #108 | 4,375 | #2,111 | 15 |
| 1958 | #100 | 4,772 | #1,766 | 20 |
| 1957 | #95 | 5,019 | #2,190 | 14 |
| 1956 | #90 | 5,278 | #1,945 | 17 |
| 1955 | #78 | 5,592 | #1,791 | 19 |
| 1954 | #72 | 5,947 | #2,114 | 14 |
| 1953 | #65 | 6,123 | #1,709 | 20 |
| 1952 | #63 | 6,464 | #1,856 | 17 |
| 1951 | #54 | 6,949 | #2,055 | 14 |
| 1950 | #50 | 7,061 | #1,701 | 19 |
| 1949 | #46 | 7,707 | #1,409 | 27 |
| 1948 | #40 | 8,301 | #1,559 | 22 |
| 1947 | #38 | 8,979 | #1,519 | 24 |
| 1946 | #36 | 8,852 | #1,217 | 33 |
| 1945 | #31 | 8,301 | #1,204 | 30 |
| 1944 | #31 | 8,696 | #1,107 | 36 |
| 1943 | #28 | 9,800 | #1,106 | 38 |
| 1942 | #26 | 10,016 | #1,119 | 37 |
| 1941 | #24 | 9,887 | #905 | 49 |
| 1940 | #18 | 10,203 | #1,050 | 38 |
| 1939 | #16 | 10,420 | #931 | 45 |
| 1938 | #13 | 10,837 | #757 | 65 |
| 1937 | #12 | 11,453 | #751 | 66 |
| 1936 | #11 | 12,234 | #844 | 52 |
| 1935 | #10 | 12,785 | #750 | 67 |
| 1934 | #9 | 14,100 | #897 | 49 |
| 1933 | #8 | 14,644 | #637 | 82 |
| 1932 | #8 | 16,376 | #632 | 89 |
| 1931 | #6 | 17,664 | #756 | 67 |
| 1930 | #4 | 19,913 | #685 | 83 |
| 1929 | #4 | 20,983 | #705 | 77 |
| 1928 | #4 | 22,937 | #669 | 88 |
| 1927 | #4 | 25,316 | #662 | 92 |
| 1926 | #4 | 26,886 | #745 | 74 |
| 1925 | #4 | 29,173 | #723 | 80 |
| 1924 | #3 | 31,194 | #746 | 79 |
| 1923 | #3 | 31,486 | #860 | 62 |
| 1922 | #3 | 32,510 | #830 | 67 |
| 1921 | #3 | 34,822 | #849 | 66 |
| 1920 | #3 | 35,097 | #853 | 63 |
| 1919 | #2 | 33,706 | #850 | 60 |
| 1918 | #2 | 36,148 | #706 | 80 |
| 1917 | #2 | 34,251 | #804 | 61 |
| 1916 | #2 | 32,661 | #641 | 83 |
| 1915 | #2 | 30,866 | #776 | 60 |
| 1914 | #2 | 23,221 | #697 | 54 |
| 1913 | #2 | 18,888 | #615 | 51 |
| 1912 | #2 | 16,133 | #692 | 38 |
| 1911 | #2 | 11,801 | #426 | 46 |
| 1910 | #2 | 10,479 | #512 | 30 |
| 1909 | #2 | 9,250 | #408 | 36 |
| 1908 | #2 | 8,439 | #438 | 30 |
| 1907 | #2 | 7,579 | #540 | 20 |
| 1906 | #2 | 7,176 | #431 | 26 |
| 1905 | #2 | 6,811 | #421 | 26 |
| 1904 | #2 | 6,488 | #587 | 15 |
| 1903 | #2 | 6,129 | #357 | 29 |
| 1902 | #2 | 5,967 | #360 | 30 |
| 1901 | #2 | 5,247 | #466 | 17 |
| 1900 | #2 | 6,342 | #578 | 18 |
| 1899 | #3 | 5,048 | #481 | 16 |
| 1898 | #3 | 5,230 | #505 | 17 |
| 1897 | #3 | 4,519 | #495 | 16 |
| 1896 | #3 | 4,392 | #722 | 10 |
| 1895 | #3 | 4,023 | #491 | 17 |
| 1894 | #4 | 3,676 | #787 | 8 |
| 1893 | #6 | 3,249 | #768 | 8 |
| 1892 | #9 | 2,936 | #861 | 7 |
| 1891 | #9 | 2,417 | #635 | 9 |
| 1890 | #12 | 2,312 | #814 | 7 |
| 1889 | #17 | 1,909 | #722 | 8 |
| 1888 | #16 | 1,847 | #1,031 | 5 |
| 1887 | #21 | 1,405 | — | |
| 1886 | #25 | 1,267 | — | |
| 1885 | #28 | 1,134 | #836 | 6 |
| 1884 | #33 | 986 | — | |
| 1883 | #35 | 862 | #892 | 5 |
| 1882 | #31 | 838 | — | |
| 1881 | #43 | 612 | #706 | 7 |
| 1880 | #35 | 636 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Helen was already there! It came in at #35, and was given to 636 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 870 girls a year got the name.
Where Helen is popular in 1924
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Pennsylvania#2 · 1 in 24
- Connecticut#2 · 1 in 25
- Hawaii#2 · 1 in 43
- Nevada#3 · 1 in 14
- Wyoming#3 · 1 in 22
Best ever in a state: #1 in Washington, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | #2 | 529 | 1 in 25 |
| Hawaii | #2 | 85 | 1 in 43 |
| Pennsylvania | #2 | 4,194 | 1 in 24 |
| Kentucky | #3 | 643 | 1 in 49 |
| Louisiana | #3 | 450 | 1 in 54 |
| Massachusetts | #3 | 1,231 | 1 in 30 |
| Montana | #3 | 163 | 1 in 25 |
| Nevada | #3 | 18 | 1 in 14 |
| New Jersey | #3 | 1,219 | 1 in 26 |
| New York | #3 | 3,088 | 1 in 33 |
| North Dakota | #3 | 179 | 1 in 36 |
| Rhode Island | #3 | 169 | 1 in 35 |
| Utah | #3 | 152 | 1 in 33 |
| West Virginia | #3 | 693 | 1 in 31 |
| Wyoming | #3 | 80 | 1 in 22 |
| Arkansas | #4 | 399 | 1 in 54 |
| Colorado | #4 | 284 | 1 in 32 |
| Delaware | #4 | 59 | 1 in 28 |
| District of Columbia | #4 | 121 | 1 in 32 |
| Idaho | #4 | 124 | 1 in 31 |
| Illinois | #4 | 1,836 | 1 in 34 |
| Indiana | #4 | 896 | 1 in 32 |
| Iowa | #4 | 608 | 1 in 36 |
| Kansas | #4 | 461 | 1 in 36 |
| Maryland | #4 | 416 | 1 in 35 |
| Michigan | #4 | 1,267 | 1 in 32 |
| Minnesota | #4 | 554 | 1 in 41 |
| Missouri | #4 | 927 | 1 in 35 |
| Nebraska | #4 | 341 | 1 in 36 |
| New Mexico | #4 | 93 | 1 in 46 |
| Ohio | #4 | 1,967 | 1 in 29 |
| Oklahoma | #4 | 549 | 1 in 47 |
| Oregon | #4 | 186 | 1 in 33 |
| South Dakota | #4 | 176 | 1 in 36 |
| Texas | #4 | 984 | 1 in 63 |
| Arizona | #5 | 86 | 1 in 43 |
| California | #5 | 820 | 1 in 46 |
| Florida | #5 | 233 | 1 in 57 |
| New Hampshire | #5 | 101 | 1 in 37 |
| Tennessee | #5 | 606 | 1 in 49 |
| Vermont | #5 | 67 | 1 in 40 |
| Virginia | #5 | 650 | 1 in 44 |
| Wisconsin | #5 | 617 | 1 in 41 |
| Maine | #6 | 136 | 1 in 53 |
| Mississippi | #6 | 319 | 1 in 72 |
| North Carolina | #6 | 848 | 1 in 49 |
| Washington | #6 | 248 | 1 in 40 |
| South Carolina | #7 | 398 | 1 in 62 |
| Alabama | #9 | 455 | 1 in 72 |
| Georgia | #12 | 465 | 1 in 74 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Helen
- 36 spots since 2024 (#425 → #461)
- 35 spots since 2020 (#426 → #461)
- 42 spots since 2015 (#419 → #461)
- Biggest jump: 31 spots in 2005 (#364 → #333)
- Biggest drop: 51 spots in 2003 (#341 → #392)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1918 at #2 (36,148 births)
- Births halved by 1931, 13 yrs later
- Top 10: 45 yrs · run 1891–1935
- Top 100: 79 yrs · run 1880–1958
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 32 girls born in 1917 were named Helen (3.2%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,406 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- Its best rank, #2 in 1918, was only 1 in 32 (3.1%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 28.4% of all girls named Helen (290,404) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 11,496 | #16 (1888) | #28 |
| 1890s | 37,802 | #3 (1898) | #6 |
| 1900s | 69,428 | #2 (1909) | #2 |
| 1910s | 248,154 | #2 (1918) | #2 |
| 1920s | 290,404 | #3 (1920) | #4 |
| 1930s | 140,426 | #4 (1930) | #10 |
| 1940s | 90,742 | #18 (1940) | #32 |
| 1950s | 57,580 | #50 (1950) | #78 |
| 1960s | 29,099 | #117 (1960) | #141 |
| 1970s | 11,476 | #191 (1970) | #233 |
| 1980s | 8,413 | #272 (1980) | #292 |
| 1990s | 8,403 | #307 (1993) | #330 |
| 2000s | 8,847 | #333 (2005) | #357 |
| 2010s | 7,585 | #403 (2014) | #417 |
| 2020s | 4,347 | #395 (2023) | #429 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Helen in 1924
Top girls' names in 1924
Top boys' names in 1924
More about 1924
girls
1,248,872 girls got a published name in 1924; 1 in 40 of them was named Helen, which outranked 99.9% of the 5,900 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,132,742 boys got a published name in 1924; 1 in 14,339 of them was named Helen, which outranked 85.0% of the 4,970 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).