Hope
#352 for girls in 2025, 868 births · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to girls 99.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1999 · 2,265 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 97,225since 1880
Hope over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Hope has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #352 | 868 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #317 | 973 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | #302 | 1,026 | #9,763 | 7 |
| 2022 | #258 | 1,214 | #9,823 | 7 |
| 2021 | #225 | 1,329 | #12,146 | 5 |
| 2020 | #202 | 1,439 | #8,067 | 9 |
| 2019 | #227 | 1,374 | #6,777 | 12 |
| 2018 | #252 | 1,296 | #8,154 | 9 |
| 2017 | #250 | 1,271 | #10,775 | 6 |
| 2016 | #238 | 1,353 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #225 | 1,453 | #12,086 | 5 |
| 2014 | #229 | 1,451 | — | |
| 2013 | #230 | 1,397 | — | |
| 2012 | #218 | 1,456 | — | |
| 2011 | #227 | 1,396 | — | |
| 2010 | #240 | 1,313 | — | |
| 2009 | #230 | 1,434 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #220 | 1,537 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #206 | 1,684 | — | |
| 2006 | #198 | 1,778 | — | |
| 2005 | #183 | 1,891 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #178 | 1,913 | #5,007 | 16 |
| 2003 | #172 | 1,897 | #7,245 | 9 |
| 2002 | #160 | 2,055 | — | |
| 2001 | #150 | 2,180 | — | |
| 2000 | #146 | 2,321 | #10,349 | 5 |
| 1999 | #143 | 2,265 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #160 | 1,951 | #9,631 | 5 |
| 1997 | #171 | 1,770 | — | |
| 1996 | #186 | 1,610 | — | |
| 1995 | #193 | 1,529 | #7,792 | 6 |
| 1994 | #232 | 1,226 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | #287 | 956 | — | |
| 1992 | #310 | 892 | — | |
| 1991 | #264 | 1,052 | — | |
| 1990 | #266 | 1,056 | — | |
| 1989 | #299 | 872 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #300 | 823 | — | |
| 1987 | #300 | 808 | — | |
| 1986 | #273 | 910 | — | |
| 1985 | #275 | 908 | — | |
| 1984 | #294 | 812 | — | |
| 1983 | #430 | 502 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #412 | 557 | — | |
| 1981 | #360 | 651 | — | |
| 1980 | #309 | 781 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #305 | 786 | #4,842 | 7 |
| 1978 | #269 | 865 | #3,857 | 9 |
| 1977 | #243 | 1,019 | #4,164 | 8 |
| 1976 | #214 | 1,151 | #4,935 | 6 |
| 1975 | #202 | 1,208 | #4,797 | 6 |
| 1974 | #196 | 1,298 | — | |
| 1973 | #263 | 950 | — | |
| 1972 | #213 | 1,296 | #3,622 | 8 |
| 1971 | #205 | 1,454 | #3,370 | 9 |
| 1970 | #295 | 986 | #3,836 | 7 |
| 1969 | #287 | 979 | #2,861 | 10 |
| 1968 | #306 | 832 | #4,136 | 5 |
| 1967 | #272 | 965 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | #223 | 1,359 | #3,537 | 6 |
| 1965 | #252 | 1,153 | #3,930 | 5 |
| 1964 | #246 | 1,275 | — | |
| 1963 | #395 | 588 | — | |
| 1962 | #435 | 500 | — | |
| 1961 | #435 | 512 | — | |
| 1960 | #400 | 570 | — | |
| 1959 | #396 | 563 | — | |
| 1958 | #383 | 578 | — | |
| 1957 | #448 | 441 | — | |
| 1956 | #377 | 547 | — | |
| 1955 | #376 | 552 | — | |
| 1954 | #394 | 484 | — | |
| 1953 | #397 | 456 | — | |
| 1952 | #390 | 445 | — | |
| 1951 | #377 | 468 | #3,714 | 5 |
| 1950 | #367 | 474 | — | |
| 1949 | #411 | 376 | #3,298 | 6 |
| 1948 | #434 | 335 | #2,788 | 8 |
| 1947 | #404 | 406 | #2,862 | 8 |
| 1946 | #379 | 403 | — | |
| 1945 | #496 | 215 | — | |
| 1944 | #487 | 218 | — | |
| 1943 | #428 | 295 | #2,732 | 8 |
| 1942 | #404 | 315 | #3,212 | 6 |
| 1941 | #452 | 233 | #2,656 | 8 |
| 1940 | #459 | 213 | #3,130 | 6 |
| 1939 | #449 | 223 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | #425 | 251 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #433 | 227 | #2,905 | 7 |
| 1936 | #451 | 200 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #495 | 163 | #2,529 | 9 |
| 1934 | #474 | 187 | — | |
| 1933 | #454 | 207 | — | |
| 1932 | #472 | 195 | #2,638 | 9 |
| 1931 | #463 | 194 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #433 | 239 | #3,592 | 6 |
| 1929 | #418 | 253 | — | |
| 1928 | #404 | 279 | #4,151 | 5 |
| 1927 | #373 | 338 | #3,151 | 8 |
| 1926 | #388 | 311 | #3,139 | 8 |
| 1925 | #373 | 339 | #2,193 | 14 |
| 1924 | #333 | 407 | #2,641 | 11 |
| 1923 | #343 | 368 | #2,446 | 12 |
| 1922 | #336 | 371 | #2,040 | 16 |
| 1921 | #344 | 361 | #1,904 | 18 |
| 1920 | #349 | 349 | #1,885 | 18 |
| 1919 | #351 | 333 | #2,385 | 12 |
| 1918 | #336 | 369 | #2,260 | 13 |
| 1917 | #367 | 295 | #2,732 | 9 |
| 1916 | #388 | 262 | #2,730 | 9 |
| 1915 | #412 | 210 | #2,458 | 10 |
| 1914 | #503 | 124 | — | |
| 1913 | #501 | 104 | #1,945 | 9 |
| 1912 | #492 | 94 | #1,619 | 10 |
| 1911 | #507 | 67 | #1,537 | 6 |
| 1910 | #519 | 62 | — | |
| 1909 | #479 | 61 | — | |
| 1908 | #617 | 38 | — | |
| 1907 | #511 | 49 | — | |
| 1906 | #477 | 51 | #1,253 | 5 |
| 1905 | #579 | 36 | — | |
| 1904 | #469 | 49 | — | |
| 1903 | #467 | 47 | — | |
| 1902 | #583 | 32 | #1,137 | 5 |
| 1901 | #547 | 31 | — | |
| 1900 | #589 | 35 | — | |
| 1899 | #756 | 18 | — | |
| 1898 | #555 | 33 | — | |
| 1897 | #554 | 29 | — | |
| 1896 | #553 | 30 | — | |
| 1895 | #465 | 39 | — | |
| 1894 | #475 | 35 | — | |
| 1893 | #449 | 35 | — | |
| 1892 | #590 | 22 | — | |
| 1891 | #506 | 26 | — | |
| 1890 | #508 | 26 | — | |
| 1889 | #600 | 18 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | — | |
| 1887 | #560 | 16 | — | |
| 1886 | #572 | 15 | — | |
| 1885 | #470 | 20 | — | |
| 1884 | #556 | 14 | — | |
| 1883 | #465 | 17 | — | |
| 1882 | #813 | 6 | — | |
| 1881 | #679 | 7 | — | |
| 1880 | #580 | 9 | #809 | 6 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Hope was already there! It came in at #580, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1882, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.
Where Hope is popular in 1952
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Rhode Island#175 · 1 in 1,365
- Connecticut#247 · 1 in 2,531
- Colorado#265 · 1 in 1,806
- Virginia#272 · 1 in 2,148
- New York#300 · 1 in 2,709
Best ever in a state: #28 in Hawaii, 2022.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | #175 | 6 | 1 in 1,365 |
| Connecticut | #247 | 8 | 1 in 2,531 |
| Colorado | #265 | 9 | 1 in 1,806 |
| Virginia | #272 | 18 | 1 in 2,148 |
| New York | #300 | 57 | 1 in 2,709 |
| Arizona | #304 | 6 | 1 in 1,740 |
| Massachusetts | #305 | 11 | 1 in 4,393 |
| District of Columbia | #312 | 5 | 1 in 2,613 |
| New Jersey | #321 | 13 | 1 in 3,740 |
| California | #327 | 51 | 1 in 2,575 |
| Pennsylvania | #333 | 30 | 1 in 3,702 |
| Texas | #356 | 39 | 1 in 2,732 |
| Minnesota | #358 | 8 | 1 in 4,409 |
| West Virginia | #360 | 6 | 1 in 3,701 |
| Wisconsin | #360 | 8 | 1 in 5,009 |
| Michigan | #377 | 19 | 1 in 4,253 |
| Illinois | #384 | 20 | 1 in 4,700 |
| Iowa | #412 | 5 | 1 in 5,687 |
| Ohio | #415 | 16 | 1 in 5,937 |
| South Carolina | #415 | 7 | 1 in 4,182 |
| Florida | #428 | 8 | 1 in 4,089 |
| Indiana | #453 | 7 | 1 in 6,655 |
| Georgia | #460 | 8 | 1 in 5,506 |
| North Carolina | #463 | 9 | 1 in 5,674 |
| Missouri | #487 | 6 | 1 in 6,889 |
| Kentucky | #490 | 5 | 1 in 6,737 |
| Mississippi | #500 | 5 | 1 in 5,637 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Hope
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 35 spots since 2024 (#317 → #352)
- 150 spots since 2020 (#202 → #352)
- 127 spots since 2015 (#225 → #352)
- Biggest jump: 536 spots in 1889 (#1,136 → #600)
- Biggest drop: 576 spots in 1888 (#560 → #1,136)
Rise & fade · girls
119 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1999 at #143 (2,265 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 24 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 145 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 145 yrs · run 1889–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 782
- Highest: 1 in 782 girls born in 2000 were named Hope (0.13%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,852 girls born in 2025 (0.05%)
- Its best rank, #143 in 1999, was only 1 in 783 (0.13%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 19.2% of all girls named Hope (18,690) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 128 | #465 (1883) | #643 |
| 1890s | 293 | #449 (1893) | #541 |
| 1900s | 429 | #467 (1903) | #532 |
| 1910s | 1,920 | #336 (1918) | #438 |
| 1920s | 3,376 | #333 (1924) | #366 |
| 1930s | 2,086 | #425 (1938) | #455 |
| 1940s | 3,009 | #379 (1946) | #435 |
| 1950s | 5,008 | #367 (1950) | #391 |
| 1960s | 8,733 | #223 (1966) | #325 |
| 1970s | 11,013 | #196 (1974) | #241 |
| 1980s | 7,624 | #273 (1986) | #325 |
| 1990s | 14,307 | #143 (1999) | #221 |
| 2000s | 18,690 | #146 (2000) | #184 |
| 2010s | 13,760 | #218 (2012) | #234 |
| 2020s | 6,849 | #202 (2020) | #276 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Hope in 1952
girls
#390
445 births · 1 in 4,167 girls
Top girls' names in 1952
More about 1952
girls
1,854,335 girls got a published name in 1952; 1 in 4,167 of them was named Hope, which outranked 93.9% of the 6,389 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Hope
Biggest movers since 1951
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.