Hubert
Last seen for girls in 1948 at #4,651 · #3,379 for boys in 2025, 34 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1910 · 289 births
- Debut · boys
- 59 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 57,572since 1880
Hubert over time
Rank among boys' names. Hubert has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,379 | 34 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,524 | 32 | |
| 2023 | — | #4,456 | 23 | |
| 2022 | — | #3,691 | 30 | |
| 2021 | — | #3,740 | 29 | |
| 2020 | — | #2,925 | 40 | |
| 2019 | — | #4,003 | 26 | |
| 2018 | — | #3,607 | 30 | |
| 2017 | — | #3,193 | 36 | |
| 2016 | — | #3,059 | 38 | |
| 2015 | — | #3,085 | 37 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,542 | 48 | |
| 2013 | — | #3,339 | 32 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,678 | 45 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,590 | 47 | |
| 2010 | — | #2,511 | 49 | |
| 2009 | — | #3,105 | 37 | |
| 2008 | — | #2,583 | 48 | |
| 2007 | — | #2,442 | 52 | |
| 2006 | — | #2,348 | 53 | |
| 2005 | — | #2,129 | 57 | |
| 2004 | — | #2,208 | 52 | |
| 2003 | — | #2,312 | 46 | |
| 2002 | — | #2,155 | 49 | |
| 2001 | — | #2,217 | 46 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,895 | 55 | |
| 1999 | — | #2,098 | 45 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,987 | 48 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,753 | 55 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,533 | 65 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,549 | 61 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,643 | 55 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,524 | 60 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,246 | 82 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,236 | 81 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,201 | 82 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,045 | 98 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,041 | 90 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,062 | 81 | |
| 1986 | — | #954 | 92 | |
| 1985 | — | #857 | 110 | |
| 1984 | — | #848 | 107 | |
| 1983 | — | #895 | 96 | |
| 1982 | — | #732 | 141 | |
| 1981 | — | #792 | 122 | |
| 1980 | — | #701 | 153 | |
| 1979 | — | #777 | 124 | |
| 1978 | — | #707 | 141 | |
| 1977 | — | #665 | 161 | |
| 1976 | — | #674 | 149 | |
| 1975 | — | #650 | 159 | |
| 1974 | — | #647 | 155 | |
| 1973 | — | #587 | 182 | |
| 1972 | — | #591 | 182 | |
| 1971 | — | #522 | 242 | |
| 1970 | — | #515 | 245 | |
| 1969 | — | #505 | 235 | |
| 1968 | — | #471 | 258 | |
| 1967 | — | #471 | 258 | |
| 1966 | — | #459 | 276 | |
| 1965 | — | #442 | 306 | |
| 1964 | — | #434 | 338 | |
| 1963 | — | #431 | 341 | |
| 1962 | — | #453 | 309 | |
| 1961 | — | #412 | 370 | |
| 1960 | — | #395 | 400 | |
| 1959 | — | #385 | 422 | |
| 1958 | — | #345 | 491 | |
| 1957 | — | #343 | 482 | |
| 1956 | — | #340 | 484 | |
| 1955 | — | #318 | 536 | |
| 1954 | — | #319 | 508 | |
| 1953 | — | #298 | 561 | |
| 1952 | — | #295 | 563 | |
| 1951 | — | #272 | 620 | |
| 1950 | — | #269 | 603 | |
| 1949 | — | #259 | 625 | |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 | #253 | 653 |
| 1947 | — | #241 | 732 | |
| 1946 | — | #230 | 681 | |
| 1945 | — | #222 | 610 | |
| 1944 | — | #197 | 760 | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #207 | 756 |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 | #201 | 787 |
| 1941 | — | #196 | 731 | |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | #187 | 762 |
| 1939 | — | #181 | 783 | |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | #178 | 825 |
| 1937 | — | #164 | 893 | |
| 1936 | — | #161 | 891 | |
| 1935 | #3,156 | 8 | #160 | 905 |
| 1934 | #3,802 | 6 | #150 | 999 |
| 1933 | #3,406 | 7 | #155 | 930 |
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 | #146 | 1,087 |
| 1931 | #3,497 | 7 | #136 | 1,229 |
| 1930 | #4,047 | 6 | #137 | 1,277 |
| 1929 | #2,191 | 15 | #124 | 1,384 |
| 1928 | #2,381 | 14 | #121 | 1,488 |
| 1927 | #2,699 | 12 | #128 | 1,376 |
| 1926 | #3,564 | 8 | #131 | 1,320 |
| 1925 | #3,116 | 10 | #124 | 1,461 |
| 1924 | — | #115 | 1,551 | |
| 1923 | #3,641 | 8 | #117 | 1,533 |
| 1922 | — | #116 | 1,527 | |
| 1921 | — | #115 | 1,548 | |
| 1920 | #3,097 | 10 | #113 | 1,508 |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | #115 | 1,416 |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 | #114 | 1,454 |
| 1917 | #2,879 | 10 | #115 | 1,338 |
| 1916 | #3,031 | 9 | #113 | 1,348 |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #116 | 1,195 |
| 1914 | — | #118 | 932 | |
| 1913 | — | #112 | 765 | |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 | #122 | 544 |
| 1911 | — | #119 | 316 | |
| 1910 | — | #105 | 289 | |
| 1909 | — | #124 | 222 | |
| 1908 | — | #123 | 203 | |
| 1907 | — | #129 | 184 | |
| 1906 | — | #129 | 162 | |
| 1905 | — | #136 | 163 | |
| 1904 | — | #124 | 173 | |
| 1903 | — | #115 | 170 | |
| 1902 | — | #117 | 165 | |
| 1901 | — | #119 | 140 | |
| 1900 | — | #123 | 189 | |
| 1899 | — | #129 | 125 | |
| 1898 | — | #149 | 114 | |
| 1897 | — | #132 | 123 | |
| 1896 | — | #139 | 119 | |
| 1895 | — | #145 | 106 | |
| 1894 | — | #144 | 105 | |
| 1893 | — | #139 | 107 | |
| 1892 | — | #181 | 86 | |
| 1891 | — | #144 | 92 | |
| 1890 | — | #166 | 85 | |
| 1889 | — | #160 | 83 | |
| 1888 | — | #200 | 75 | |
| 1887 | — | #160 | 78 | |
| 1886 | — | #216 | 61 | |
| 1885 | — | #181 | 72 | |
| 1884 | — | #213 | 61 | |
| 1883 | — | #205 | 53 | |
| 1882 | — | #238 | 49 | |
| 1881 | — | #233 | 43 | |
| 1880 | — | #207 | 59 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Hubert was already there! It came in at #207, and was given to 59 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2021–2025, when fewer than 35 boys a year got the name.
Where Hubert is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- North Carolina#37 · 1 in 195
- Tennessee#46 · 1 in 217
- Mississippi#47 · 1 in 266
- Alabama#56 · 1 in 279
- Georgia#62 · 1 in 287
Best ever in a state: #37 in North Carolina, 1916.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | #37 | 129 | 1 in 195 |
| Tennessee | #46 | 86 | 1 in 217 |
| Mississippi | #47 | 61 | 1 in 266 |
| Alabama | #56 | 76 | 1 in 279 |
| Georgia | #62 | 91 | 1 in 287 |
| Kentucky | #63 | 69 | 1 in 286 |
| Arkansas | #70 | 45 | 1 in 304 |
| Missouri | #74 | 74 | 1 in 333 |
| Virginia | #80 | 44 | 1 in 419 |
| Oklahoma | #81 | 46 | 1 in 338 |
| West Virginia | #84 | 27 | 1 in 414 |
| South Carolina | #86 | 34 | 1 in 493 |
| Texas | #95 | 85 | 1 in 450 |
| Indiana | #98 | 39 | 1 in 522 |
| Iowa | #100 | 36 | 1 in 501 |
| Michigan | #121 | 38 | 1 in 726 |
| Washington | #126 | 11 | 1 in 679 |
| Florida | #128 | 11 | 1 in 683 |
| New Mexico | #129 | 5 | 1 in 544 |
| Kansas | #131 | 18 | 1 in 732 |
| Wisconsin | #133 | 26 | 1 in 772 |
| Maine | #134 | 7 | 1 in 676 |
| Ohio | #138 | 40 | 1 in 1,015 |
| Idaho | #139 | 5 | 1 in 647 |
| Nebraska | #139 | 15 | 1 in 693 |
| Montana | #145 | 6 | 1 in 790 |
| California | #148 | 19 | 1 in 945 |
| Illinois | #149 | 46 | 1 in 1,080 |
| Connecticut | #160 | 7 | 1 in 1,644 |
| Colorado | #166 | 6 | 1 in 1,033 |
| Minnesota | #171 | 16 | 1 in 1,175 |
| Utah | #185 | 5 | 1 in 791 |
| Massachusetts | #193 | 13 | 1 in 2,236 |
| Maryland | #194 | 5 | 1 in 2,043 |
| Pennsylvania | #194 | 31 | 1 in 2,367 |
| New York | #201 | 37 | 1 in 2,170 |
| Louisiana | #210 | 13 | 1 in 1,141 |
| New Jersey | #211 | 8 | 1 in 3,030 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Hubert
- 145 spots since 2024 (#3,524 → #3,379)
- 454 spots since 2020 (#2,925 → #3,379)
- 294 spots since 2015 (#3,085 → #3,379)
- Biggest jump: 76 spots in 1980 (#777 → #701)
- Biggest drop: 163 spots in 1983 (#732 → #895)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1910 at #105 (289 births)
- Births halved by 1978, 68 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 107 yrs · run 1880–1986
- Highest: 1 in 660 boys born in 1916 were named Hubert (0.15%)
- Latest: 1 in 50,238 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #105 in 1910, was only 1 in 672 (0.15%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 25.5% of all boys named Hubert (14,696) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 634 | #160 (1889) | #201 |
| 1890s | 1,062 | #129 (1899) | #147 |
| 1900s | 1,771 | #115 (1903) | #124 |
| 1910s | 9,597 | #105 (1910) | #115 |
| 1920s | 14,696 | #113 (1920) | #120 |
| 1930s | 9,819 | #136 (1931) | #157 |
| 1940s | 7,097 | #187 (1940) | #219 |
| 1950s | 5,270 | #269 (1950) | #318 |
| 1960s | 3,091 | #395 (1960) | #447 |
| 1970s | 1,740 | #515 (1970) | #634 |
| 1980s | 1,090 | #701 (1980) | #893 |
| 1990s | 634 | #1,201 (1990) | #1,577 |
| 2000s | 495 | #1,895 (2000) | #2,339 |
| 2010s | 388 | #2,511 (2010) | #3,061 |
| 2020s | 188 | #2,925 (2020) | #3,619 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Hubert in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 116,037 of them was named Hubert, which outranked 41.3% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,833Yoshiye10
- #2,833Yula10
- #2,833Zofia10
- #3,031Hubert9
- #3,031Addis9
- #3,031Adelaida9
- #3,031Adelma9
- #3,258Adabelle8
- #3,258Adina8
- #3,258Adine8
Tied with 226 names at #3,031; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 660 of them was named Hubert, which outranked 97.5% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.