Hubert

Last seen for girls in 1948 at #4,651 · #3,379 for boys in 2025, 34 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1910 · 289 births
Debut · boys
59 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
57,572
since 1880

Hubert over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Hubert has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201971peak #105, 1910boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#3,37934
2024—#3,52432
2023—#4,45623
2022—#3,69130
2021—#3,74029
2020—#2,92540
2019—#4,00326
2018—#3,60730
2017—#3,19336
2016—#3,05938
2015—#3,08537
2014—#2,54248
2013—#3,33932
2012—#2,67845
2011—#2,59047
2010—#2,51149
2009—#3,10537
2008—#2,58348
2007—#2,44252
2006—#2,34853
2005—#2,12957
2004—#2,20852
2003—#2,31246
2002—#2,15549
2001—#2,21746
2000—#1,89555
1999—#2,09845
1998—#1,98748
1997—#1,75355
1996—#1,53365
1995—#1,54961
1994—#1,64355
1993—#1,52460
1992—#1,24682
1991—#1,23681
1990—#1,20182
1989—#1,04598
1988—#1,04190
1987—#1,06281
1986—#95492
1985—#857110
1984—#848107
1983—#89596
1982—#732141
1981—#792122
1980—#701153
1979—#777124
1978—#707141
1977—#665161
1976—#674149
1975—#650159
1974—#647155
1973—#587182
1972—#591182
1971—#522242
1970—#515245
1969—#505235
1968—#471258
1967—#471258
1966—#459276
1965—#442306
1964—#434338
1963—#431341
1962—#453309
1961—#412370
1960—#395400
1959—#385422
1958—#345491
1957—#343482
1956—#340484
1955—#318536
1954—#319508
1953—#298561
1952—#295563
1951—#272620
1950—#269603
1949—#259625
1948#4,6516#253653
1947—#241732
1946—#230681
1945—#222610
1944—#197760
1943#4,6915#207756
1942#4,1246#201787
1941—#196731
1940#4,3495#187762
1939—#181783
1938#3,4507#178825
1937—#164893
1936—#161891
1935#3,1568#160905
1934#3,8026#150999
1933#3,4067#155930
1932#4,4115#1461,087
1931#3,4977#1361,229
1930#4,0476#1371,277
1929#2,19115#1241,384
1928#2,38114#1211,488
1927#2,69912#1281,376
1926#3,5648#1311,320
1925#3,11610#1241,461
1924—#1151,551
1923#3,6418#1171,533
1922—#1161,527
1921—#1151,548
1920#3,09710#1131,508
1919#3,8177#1151,416
1918#3,8697#1141,454
1917#2,87910#1151,338
1916#3,0319#1131,348
1915#4,2745#1161,195
1914—#118932
1913—#112765
1912#2,6346#122544
1911—#119316
1910—#105289
1909—#124222
1908—#123203
1907—#129184
1906—#129162
1905—#136163
1904—#124173
1903—#115170
1902—#117165
1901—#119140
1900—#123189
1899—#129125
1898—#149114
1897—#132123
1896—#139119
1895—#145106
1894—#144105
1893—#139107
1892—#18186
1891—#14492
1890—#16685
1889—#16083
1888—#20075
1887—#16078
1886—#21661
1885—#18172
1884—#21361
1883—#20553
1882—#23849
1881—#23343
1880—#20759
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Hubert was already there! It came in at #207, and was given to 59 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 2021–2025, when fewer than 35 boys a year got the name.

Where Hubert is popular in 1971

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedMNIllinois: #691 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 13,005 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedWIMichigan: #490 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 7,652 boysMINew York: #550 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 8,566 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedIAIndiana: #378 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 5,092 boysINOhio: #582 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 13,167 boysOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedPANew Jersey: #576 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 10,323 boysNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #651 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 10,100 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedMOKentucky: #344 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 4,163 boysKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedWVVirginia: #336 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 3,669 boysVAMaryland: #344 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 4,415 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedARTennessee: #353 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 3,842 boysTNNorth Carolina: #257 for boys · 22 births · 1 in 2,023 boysNCSouth Carolina: #299 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 2,340 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #450 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,136 boysLAMississippi: #254 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 1,640 boysMSAlabama: #310 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 2,742 boysALGeorgia: #329 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 2,740 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Hubert, so not publishedHITexas: #567 for boys · 17 births · 1 in 6,709 boysTXFlorida: #405 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 4,139 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Mississippi#254 · 1 in 1,640
  2. North Carolina#257 · 1 in 2,023
  3. South Carolina#299 · 1 in 2,340
  4. Alabama#310 · 1 in 2,742
  5. Georgia#329 · 1 in 2,740

Best ever in a state: #37 in North Carolina, 1916.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#254131 in 1,640
North Carolina#257221 in 2,023
South Carolina#299101 in 2,340
Alabama#310111 in 2,742
Georgia#329161 in 2,740
Virginia#336101 in 3,669
Kentucky#34471 in 4,163
Maryland#34461 in 4,415
Tennessee#35391 in 3,842
Indiana#37891 in 5,092
Florida#405131 in 4,139
Louisiana#45081 in 4,136
Michigan#490101 in 7,652
New York#550161 in 8,566
Texas#567171 in 6,709
New Jersey#57651 in 10,323
Ohio#58271 in 13,167
California#651161 in 10,100
Illinois#69171 in 13,005
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Hubert
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 145 spots since 2024 (#3,524 → #3,379)
  • 454 spots since 2020 (#2,925 → #3,379)
  • 294 spots since 2015 (#3,085 → #3,379)
  • Biggest jump: 76 spots in 1980 (#777 → #701)
  • Biggest drop: 163 spots in 1983 (#732 → #895)
Rise & fade · boys
30 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1910 at #105 (289 births)
  • Births halved by 1978, 68 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 107 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 107 yrs · run 1880–1986
Share of babies · boys
1 in 660
  • Highest: 1 in 660 boys born in 1916 were named Hubert (0.15%)
  • Latest: 1 in 50,238 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #105 in 1910, was only 1 in 672 (0.15%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1920s
  • 25.5% of all boys named Hubert (14,696) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s634#160 (1889)#201
1890s1,062#129 (1899)#147
1900s1,771#115 (1903)#124
1910s9,597#105 (1910)#115
1920s14,696#113 (1920)#120
1930s9,819#136 (1931)#157
1940s7,097#187 (1940)#219
1950s5,270#269 (1950)#318
1960s3,091#395 (1960)#447
1970s1,740#515 (1970)#634
1980s1,090#701 (1980)#893
1990s634#1,201 (1990)#1,577
2000s495#1,895 (2000)#2,339
2010s388#2,511 (2010)#3,061
2020s188#2,925 (2020)#3,619

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Hubert in 1971

boys
#522
242 births · 1 in 7,308 boys

Top boys' names in 1971

  1. #1Michael77,577
  2. #2James54,597
  3. #3David53,113
  4. #4John51,512
  5. #5Robert50,634
  6. #6Christopher48,225
  7. #7William35,413
  8. #8Jason34,173
  9. #9Brian32,624
  10. #10Scott30,901
  11. #522Hubert242
More about 1971

boys

1,768,447 boys got a published name in 1971; 1 in 7,308 of them was named Hubert, which outranked 90.8% of the 5,655 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 26.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Hubert
  1. #519Leland247
  2. #520Tommie246
  3. #521Rodger244
  4. #522Hubert242
  5. #522Sterling242
  6. #524Tyson241
  7. #525Rocky239
  8. #526Trenton234

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1970
Risers
  1. ↑ 754Germaine#1,582 → #828
  2. ↑ 626Jeramie#1,546 → #920
  3. ↑ 512Jeremey#1,396 → #884
  4. ↑ 473Jarod#1,337 → #864
  5. ↑ 454Jamel#1,374 → #920
Fallers
  1. ↓ 328Adolph#926 → #1,254
  2. ↓ 272Dwane#1,000 → #1,272
  3. ↓ 266Bronson#861 → #1,127
  4. ↓ 244Mitch#921 → #1,165
  5. ↓ 242Enrico#839 → #1,081

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1971 →