Hugh
Last seen for girls in 1985 at #10,677 · #732 for boys in 2025, 360 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1887 · 250 births
- Debut · boys
- 224 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 24 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 83,825since 1880
Hugh over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #732 | 360 | |
| 2024 | — | #762 | 333 | |
| 2023 | — | #782 | 323 | |
| 2022 | — | #804 | 312 | |
| 2021 | — | #742 | 343 | |
| 2020 | — | #748 | 324 | |
| 2019 | — | #799 | 287 | |
| 2018 | — | #805 | 281 | |
| 2017 | — | #837 | 264 | |
| 2016 | — | #849 | 264 | |
| 2015 | — | #847 | 265 | |
| 2014 | — | #864 | 255 | |
| 2013 | — | #914 | 227 | |
| 2012 | — | #930 | 220 | |
| 2011 | — | #943 | 210 | |
| 2010 | — | #961 | 206 | |
| 2009 | — | #991 | 199 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,002 | 195 | |
| 2007 | — | #981 | 200 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,000 | 184 | |
| 2005 | — | #959 | 182 | |
| 2004 | — | #923 | 184 | |
| 2003 | — | #879 | 194 | |
| 2002 | — | #866 | 191 | |
| 2001 | — | #858 | 187 | |
| 2000 | — | #907 | 171 | |
| 1999 | — | #850 | 178 | |
| 1998 | — | #774 | 203 | |
| 1997 | — | #743 | 202 | |
| 1996 | — | #763 | 193 | |
| 1995 | — | #807 | 175 | |
| 1994 | — | #817 | 168 | |
| 1993 | — | #901 | 142 | |
| 1992 | — | #831 | 161 | |
| 1991 | — | #774 | 176 | |
| 1990 | — | #736 | 193 | |
| 1989 | — | #686 | 210 | |
| 1988 | — | #687 | 186 | |
| 1987 | — | #646 | 199 | |
| 1986 | — | #646 | 191 | |
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | #586 | 224 |
| 1984 | — | #604 | 199 | |
| 1983 | — | #605 | 199 | |
| 1982 | — | #564 | 230 | |
| 1981 | — | #590 | 210 | |
| 1980 | — | #574 | 227 | |
| 1979 | — | #558 | 237 | |
| 1978 | — | #533 | 240 | |
| 1977 | — | #504 | 262 | |
| 1976 | — | #516 | 242 | |
| 1975 | — | #478 | 280 | |
| 1974 | — | #468 | 294 | |
| 1973 | — | #454 | 299 | |
| 1972 | — | #393 | 402 | |
| 1971 | — | #384 | 435 | |
| 1970 | — | #368 | 486 | |
| 1969 | — | #366 | 460 | |
| 1968 | #4,779 | 9 | #351 | 494 |
| 1967 | — | #337 | 502 | |
| 1966 | — | #311 | 566 | |
| 1965 | — | #293 | 656 | |
| 1964 | — | #291 | 722 | |
| 1963 | — | #272 | 794 | |
| 1962 | — | #270 | 813 | |
| 1961 | — | #269 | 873 | |
| 1960 | — | #266 | 903 | |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | #254 | 984 |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #243 | 1,031 |
| 1957 | — | #245 | 967 | |
| 1956 | — | #236 | 957 | |
| 1955 | — | #236 | 896 | |
| 1954 | — | #230 | 943 | |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | #219 | 959 |
| 1952 | — | #210 | 977 | |
| 1951 | — | #203 | 1,024 | |
| 1950 | #5,301 | 5 | #206 | 959 |
| 1949 | — | #198 | 1,042 | |
| 1948 | — | #191 | 1,039 | |
| 1947 | — | #176 | 1,201 | |
| 1946 | — | #174 | 1,088 | |
| 1945 | — | #171 | 961 | |
| 1944 | #3,139 | 9 | #165 | 1,064 |
| 1943 | — | #160 | 1,206 | |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 | #154 | 1,254 |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | #160 | 1,083 |
| 1940 | — | #157 | 1,060 | |
| 1939 | #3,782 | 6 | #160 | 999 |
| 1938 | #2,940 | 9 | #146 | 1,121 |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | #143 | 1,070 |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #142 | 1,074 |
| 1935 | #2,439 | 12 | #139 | 1,142 |
| 1934 | #2,923 | 9 | #135 | 1,187 |
| 1933 | — | #141 | 1,118 | |
| 1932 | #2,365 | 13 | #128 | 1,320 |
| 1931 | #3,226 | 8 | #131 | 1,326 |
| 1930 | #2,690 | 11 | #131 | 1,343 |
| 1929 | #2,737 | 11 | #139 | 1,228 |
| 1928 | #2,768 | 11 | #129 | 1,374 |
| 1927 | #2,169 | 17 | #131 | 1,357 |
| 1926 | #2,257 | 16 | #128 | 1,393 |
| 1925 | #2,617 | 13 | #127 | 1,386 |
| 1924 | #4,002 | 7 | #116 | 1,541 |
| 1923 | #2,091 | 18 | #123 | 1,412 |
| 1922 | #2,291 | 16 | #120 | 1,441 |
| 1921 | #2,378 | 15 | #120 | 1,485 |
| 1920 | #2,079 | 18 | #115 | 1,489 |
| 1919 | #3,219 | 9 | #114 | 1,417 |
| 1918 | #2,209 | 16 | #112 | 1,489 |
| 1917 | #2,552 | 12 | #110 | 1,403 |
| 1916 | #3,552 | 7 | #96 | 1,619 |
| 1915 | #2,900 | 9 | #111 | 1,318 |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | #116 | 967 |
| 1913 | #2,827 | 6 | #115 | 754 |
| 1912 | #2,360 | 7 | #116 | 648 |
| 1911 | #1,956 | 7 | #121 | 307 |
| 1910 | — | #112 | 279 | |
| 1909 | — | #104 | 260 | |
| 1908 | — | #121 | 215 | |
| 1907 | — | #112 | 212 | |
| 1906 | — | #110 | 195 | |
| 1905 | — | #107 | 200 | |
| 1904 | — | #105 | 202 | |
| 1903 | — | #101 | 193 | |
| 1902 | — | #92 | 217 | |
| 1901 | — | #91 | 192 | |
| 1900 | — | #88 | 290 | |
| 1899 | — | #88 | 209 | |
| 1898 | — | #84 | 250 | |
| 1897 | — | #86 | 213 | |
| 1896 | — | #75 | 263 | |
| 1895 | — | #80 | 243 | |
| 1894 | — | #75 | 269 | |
| 1893 | — | #78 | 241 | |
| 1892 | — | #77 | 265 | |
| 1891 | — | #73 | 233 | |
| 1890 | — | #80 | 219 | |
| 1889 | — | #78 | 225 | |
| 1888 | — | #79 | 253 | |
| 1887 | — | #69 | 250 | |
| 1886 | — | #77 | 227 | |
| 1885 | — | #73 | 257 | |
| 1884 | — | #73 | 246 | |
| 1883 | — | #74 | 215 | |
| 1882 | — | #73 | 239 | |
| 1881 | — | #70 | 219 | |
| 1880 | — | #71 | 224 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Hugh was already there! It came in at #71, and was given to 224 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1986–2011, when fewer than 220 boys a year got the name.
Where Hugh is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Massachusetts#491 · 1 in 4,693
- Mississippi#515 · 1 in 2,950
- Oregon#541 · 1 in 3,888
- Washington#548 · 1 in 3,858
- North Carolina#630 · 1 in 5,231
Best ever in a state: #13 in Georgia, 1916.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | #491 | 7 | 1 in 4,693 |
| Mississippi | #515 | 5 | 1 in 2,950 |
| Oregon | #541 | 5 | 1 in 3,888 |
| Washington | #548 | 9 | 1 in 3,858 |
| North Carolina | #630 | 10 | 1 in 5,231 |
| Virginia | #652 | 8 | 1 in 5,383 |
| Minnesota | #657 | 5 | 1 in 5,993 |
| Maryland | #695 | 5 | 1 in 5,756 |
| Louisiana | #702 | 5 | 1 in 4,824 |
| Tennessee | #771 | 5 | 1 in 7,368 |
| New York | #817 | 14 | 1 in 7,734 |
| New Jersey | #835 | 6 | 1 in 7,822 |
| Georgia | #849 | 8 | 1 in 7,464 |
| Michigan | #1,017 | 5 | 1 in 10,946 |
| Texas | #1,180 | 12 | 1 in 15,093 |
| Illinois | #1,272 | 5 | 1 in 15,430 |
| California | #1,295 | 13 | 1 in 19,551 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Hugh
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 30 spots since 2024 (#762 → #732)
- 16 spots since 2020 (#748 → #732)
- 115 spots since 2015 (#847 → #732)
- Biggest jump: 84 spots in 1994 (#901 → #817)
- Biggest drop: 76 spots in 1999 (#774 → #850)
Rise & fade · boys
7 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1887 at #69 (250 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 24 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 24 yrs · run 1880–1902
- Top 1,000: 145 yrs · run 1880–2007
Share of babies · boys
1 in 406
- Highest: 1 in 406 boys born in 1887 were named Hugh (0.25%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,745 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
Era · boys
The 1920s
- 16.8% of all boys named Hugh (14,106) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,355 | #69 (1887) | #74 |
| 1890s | 2,405 | #73 (1891) | #80 |
| 1900s | 2,176 | #88 (1900) | #103 |
| 1910s | 10,201 | #96 (1916) | #112 |
| 1920s | 14,106 | #115 (1920) | #125 |
| 1930s | 11,700 | #128 (1932) | #140 |
| 1940s | 10,998 | #154 (1942) | #171 |
| 1950s | 9,697 | #203 (1951) | #228 |
| 1960s | 6,783 | #266 (1960) | #303 |
| 1970s | 3,177 | #368 (1970) | #466 |
| 1980s | 2,075 | #564 (1982) | #619 |
| 1990s | 1,791 | #736 (1990) | #800 |
| 2000s | 1,887 | #858 (2001) | #937 |
| 2010s | 2,479 | #799 (2019) | #875 |
| 2020s | 1,995 | #732 (2025) | #762 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Hugh in 2005
boys
#959
182 births · 1 in 10,974 boys
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 10,974 of them was named Hugh, which outranked 92.8% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).