Huxley
- #3,975 for girls in 2025, 36 births
- #736 for boys in 2025, 357 births
- Given to boys 90.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2020 · 526 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,734since 2002
Huxley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,975 | 36 | #736 | 357 |
| 2024 | #4,473 | 31 | #743 | 346 |
| 2023 | #3,329 | 48 | #619 | 453 |
| 2022 | #3,365 | 47 | #611 | 457 |
| 2021 | #2,818 | 60 | #586 | 476 |
| 2020 | #3,338 | 46 | #537 | 526 |
| 2019 | #2,856 | 58 | #588 | 471 |
| 2018 | #3,293 | 48 | #666 | 379 |
| 2017 | #4,384 | 32 | #792 | 291 |
| 2016 | #5,130 | 26 | #867 | 259 |
| 2015 | #6,036 | 21 | #958 | 215 |
| 2014 | #6,713 | 18 | #1,355 | 126 |
| 2013 | #8,135 | 14 | #1,763 | 82 |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #1,711 | 88 |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #2,105 | 63 |
| 2010 | — | #2,826 | 42 | |
| 2009 | — | #3,721 | 28 | |
| 2008 | — | #3,744 | 28 | |
| 2007 | — | #5,661 | 15 | |
| 2006 | — | #8,732 | 8 | |
| 2005 | — | #6,226 | 12 | |
| 2004 | — | #11,356 | 5 | |
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | #8,456 | 7 | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Huxley! It came in at #8,456, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2003–2004, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Huxley is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Dakota#116 · 1 in 349
- North Dakota#226 · 1 in 671
- Wisconsin#244 · 1 in 976
- Nebraska#335 · 1 in 1,260
- Kansas#352 · 1 in 1,405
Best ever in a state: #104 in South Dakota, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #116 | 11 | 1 in 349 |
| North Dakota | #226 | 5 | 1 in 671 |
| Wisconsin | #244 | 24 | 1 in 976 |
| Nebraska | #335 | 7 | 1 in 1,260 |
| Kansas | #352 | 10 | 1 in 1,405 |
| Arkansas | #398 | 8 | 1 in 1,573 |
| Minnesota | #420 | 13 | 1 in 1,885 |
| Colorado | #441 | 13 | 1 in 2,065 |
| Missouri | #457 | 13 | 1 in 2,139 |
| Oklahoma | #504 | 8 | 1 in 2,210 |
| Michigan | #540 | 15 | 1 in 2,680 |
| Ohio | #541 | 19 | 1 in 2,765 |
| Tennessee | #551 | 13 | 1 in 2,828 |
| South Carolina | #552 | 8 | 1 in 2,650 |
| Iowa | #571 | 5 | 1 in 2,766 |
| Oregon | #604 | 5 | 1 in 3,012 |
| Utah | #621 | 6 | 1 in 3,277 |
| Kentucky | #625 | 6 | 1 in 3,423 |
| Louisiana | #672 | 6 | 1 in 3,188 |
| North Carolina | #678 | 13 | 1 in 3,959 |
| Georgia | #710 | 13 | 1 in 3,863 |
| Indiana | #711 | 8 | 1 in 3,958 |
| Washington | #737 | 8 | 1 in 4,100 |
| Arizona | #781 | 7 | 1 in 4,675 |
| Texas | #856 | 30 | 1 in 5,835 |
| Pennsylvania | #913 | 8 | 1 in 6,532 |
| New York | #950 | 13 | 1 in 6,494 |
| Illinois | #1,133 | 6 | 1 in 8,259 |
| Florida | #1,191 | 10 | 1 in 9,553 |
| California | #1,299 | 14 | 1 in 12,534 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Huxley
- 7 spots since 2024 (#743 → #736)
- 199 spots since 2020 (#537 → #736)
- 222 spots since 2015 (#958 → #736)
- Biggest jump: 397 spots in 2015
- Biggest drop: 124 spots in 2024
- Debuted 2002
- Peaked 2020 at #537 (526 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 11 yrs · run 2015–2025
- Highest: 1 in 3,282 boys born in 2020 were named Huxley (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,785 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 55.2% of all boys named Huxley (2,615) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103 | #3,721 (2009) | #6,842 |
| 2010s | 2,016 | #588 (2019) | #1,363 |
| 2020s | 2,615 | #537 (2020) | #639 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Huxley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: