Ingrid
#1,120 for girls in 2025, 209 births · Last seen for boys in 1992 at #8,435
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1967 · 578 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 27,747since 1897
Ingrid over time
Rank among girls' names. Ingrid has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,120 | 209 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,091 | 226 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,137 | 213 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,107 | 224 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,000 | 256 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,006 | 252 | — | |
| 2019 | #974 | 267 | — | |
| 2018 | #987 | 267 | — | |
| 2017 | #938 | 281 | — | |
| 2016 | #874 | 321 | — | |
| 2015 | #958 | 283 | — | |
| 2014 | #923 | 291 | — | |
| 2013 | #896 | 287 | — | |
| 2012 | #910 | 287 | — | |
| 2011 | #857 | 308 | — | |
| 2010 | #776 | 354 | — | |
| 2009 | #799 | 354 | — | |
| 2008 | #545 | 564 | — | |
| 2007 | #625 | 477 | — | |
| 2006 | #619 | 470 | — | |
| 2005 | #647 | 429 | — | |
| 2004 | #618 | 443 | — | |
| 2003 | #699 | 374 | — | |
| 2002 | #722 | 340 | — | |
| 2001 | #732 | 328 | — | |
| 2000 | #855 | 257 | — | |
| 1999 | #858 | 252 | — | |
| 1998 | #892 | 236 | — | |
| 1997 | #861 | 237 | — | |
| 1996 | #803 | 256 | — | |
| 1995 | #822 | 239 | — | |
| 1994 | #760 | 273 | — | |
| 1993 | #729 | 290 | — | |
| 1992 | #704 | 306 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #835 | 243 | — | |
| 1990 | #739 | 281 | — | |
| 1989 | #762 | 256 | #6,229 | 7 |
| 1988 | #861 | 206 | — | |
| 1987 | #774 | 230 | — | |
| 1986 | #720 | 248 | — | |
| 1985 | #785 | 213 | — | |
| 1984 | #682 | 247 | — | |
| 1983 | #639 | 268 | — | |
| 1982 | #656 | 272 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #640 | 277 | — | |
| 1980 | #634 | 287 | — | |
| 1979 | #672 | 257 | — | |
| 1978 | #679 | 235 | — | |
| 1977 | #571 | 305 | — | |
| 1976 | #526 | 337 | — | |
| 1975 | #508 | 352 | — | |
| 1974 | #487 | 362 | — | |
| 1973 | #469 | 388 | — | |
| 1972 | #415 | 469 | — | |
| 1971 | #417 | 507 | — | |
| 1970 | #424 | 523 | — | |
| 1969 | #440 | 479 | — | |
| 1968 | #431 | 484 | — | |
| 1967 | #380 | 578 | — | |
| 1966 | #404 | 524 | — | |
| 1965 | #417 | 500 | — | |
| 1964 | #424 | 535 | — | |
| 1963 | #447 | 466 | — | |
| 1962 | #467 | 427 | — | |
| 1961 | #472 | 425 | — | |
| 1960 | #458 | 455 | — | |
| 1959 | #460 | 437 | — | |
| 1958 | #498 | 372 | — | |
| 1957 | #504 | 356 | — | |
| 1956 | #584 | 259 | — | |
| 1955 | #617 | 226 | — | |
| 1954 | #611 | 220 | — | |
| 1953 | #593 | 224 | — | |
| 1952 | #607 | 205 | — | |
| 1951 | #675 | 169 | — | |
| 1950 | #728 | 138 | — | |
| 1949 | #518 | 249 | — | |
| 1948 | #521 | 251 | — | |
| 1947 | #461 | 317 | — | |
| 1946 | #457 | 290 | — | |
| 1945 | #544 | 180 | — | |
| 1944 | #541 | 179 | — | |
| 1943 | #570 | 177 | — | |
| 1942 | #773 | 96 | — | |
| 1941 | #741 | 92 | — | |
| 1940 | #894 | 64 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,066 | 45 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,343 | 30 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,303 | 31 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,186 | 36 | — | |
| 1935 | #946 | 54 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,148 | 38 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,102 | 40 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,130 | 40 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,104 | 41 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,289 | 34 | — | |
| 1929 | #941 | 58 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,738 | 23 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,127 | 46 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,357 | 34 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,409 | 33 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,679 | 26 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,672 | 25 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,730 | 24 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,341 | 35 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,255 | 37 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,216 | 38 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,018 | 50 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,079 | 43 | — | |
| 1916 | #964 | 50 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,040 | 41 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,262 | 24 | — | |
| 1913 | #925 | 33 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,117 | 22 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,031 | 18 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,171 | 15 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,290 | 11 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,044 | 15 | — | |
| 1907 | #990 | 15 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,364 | 8 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,204 | 9 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,320 | 8 | — | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | — | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | #1,502 | 6 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,385 | 6 | — | |
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Ingrid! It came in at #1,385, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1899, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Ingrid is popular in 1929
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Jersey#372 · 1 in 5,835
- Illinois#376 · 1 in 4,389
- New York#412 · 1 in 6,038
Best ever in a state: #103 in Alaska, 1952.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #372 | 5 | 1 in 5,835 |
| Illinois | #376 | 13 | 1 in 4,389 |
| New York | #412 | 16 | 1 in 6,038 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ingrid
- 29 spots since 2024 (#1,091 → #1,120)
- 114 spots since 2020 (#1,006 → #1,120)
- 162 spots since 2015 (#958 → #1,120)
- Biggest jump: 961 spots in 1907 (#1,951 → #990)
- Biggest drop: 348 spots in 1930 (#941 → #1,289)
- Debuted 1897
- Peaked 1967 at #380 (578 births)
- Births halved by 1978, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 86 yrs · run 1940–2019
- Highest: 1 in 2,856 girls born in 1967 were named Ingrid (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 7,690 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 17.6% of all girls named Ingrid (4,873) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 12 | #1,385 (1897) | #1,444 |
| 1900s | 83 | #990 (1907) | #1,398 |
| 1910s | 334 | #925 (1913) | #1,082 |
| 1920s | 341 | #941 (1929) | #1,425 |
| 1930s | 389 | #946 (1935) | #1,162 |
| 1940s | 1,895 | #457 (1946) | #602 |
| 1950s | 2,606 | #460 (1959) | #588 |
| 1960s | 4,873 | #380 (1967) | #434 |
| 1970s | 3,735 | #415 (1972) | #517 |
| 1980s | 2,504 | #634 (1980) | #715 |
| 1990s | 2,613 | #704 (1992) | #800 |
| 2000s | 4,036 | #545 (2008) | #686 |
| 2010s | 2,946 | #776 (2010) | #909 |
| 2020s | 1,380 | #1,000 (2021) | #1,077 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ingrid in 1929
Top girls' names in 1929
More about 1929
girls
1,116,561 girls got a published name in 1929; 1 in 19,251 of them was named Ingrid, which outranked 82.2% of the 5,277 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).