Isaiah
#13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births · #57 for boys in 2025, 5,267 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2006 · 10,459 births
- Debut · boys
- 40 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 30 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 254,020since 1880
Isaiah over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 | #57 | 5,267 |
| 2024 | #7,967 | 13 | #56 | 5,286 |
| 2023 | #8,055 | 13 | #56 | 5,162 |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | #58 | 5,430 |
| 2021 | #9,562 | 10 | #56 | 5,724 |
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 | #51 | 6,094 |
| 2019 | #10,473 | 9 | #53 | 6,214 |
| 2018 | #6,792 | 17 | #51 | 6,719 |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | #46 | 7,262 |
| 2016 | #6,901 | 17 | #47 | 7,573 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | #49 | 7,658 |
| 2014 | #8,966 | 12 | #48 | 7,657 |
| 2013 | #8,580 | 13 | #44 | 7,903 |
| 2012 | #9,109 | 12 | #42 | 8,190 |
| 2011 | #6,148 | 21 | #43 | 8,555 |
| 2010 | #9,790 | 11 | #43 | 8,589 |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 | #41 | 9,259 |
| 2008 | #4,882 | 30 | #42 | 9,670 |
| 2007 | #6,552 | 20 | #43 | 10,124 |
| 2006 | #5,545 | 24 | #39 | 10,459 |
| 2005 | #5,600 | 22 | #45 | 9,527 |
| 2004 | #2,781 | 58 | #45 | 9,264 |
| 2003 | #4,943 | 25 | #49 | 8,900 |
| 2002 | #4,906 | 24 | #45 | 8,965 |
| 2001 | #5,570 | 20 | #43 | 8,589 |
| 2000 | #4,791 | 24 | #47 | 8,029 |
| 1999 | #4,870 | 22 | #51 | 7,500 |
| 1998 | #3,730 | 31 | #59 | 6,487 |
| 1997 | #3,626 | 31 | #60 | 6,003 |
| 1996 | #4,059 | 26 | #71 | 5,324 |
| 1995 | #7,041 | 12 | #109 | 3,475 |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #169 | 1,870 |
| 1993 | #7,038 | 12 | #204 | 1,497 |
| 1992 | #8,065 | 10 | #212 | 1,449 |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | #208 | 1,492 |
| 1990 | #8,501 | 9 | #205 | 1,489 |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #228 | 1,190 |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | #244 | 978 |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 | #267 | 820 |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | #323 | 619 |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | #319 | 630 |
| 1984 | — | #319 | 605 | |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #336 | 553 |
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | #345 | 538 |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | #396 | 421 |
| 1980 | — | #438 | 355 | |
| 1979 | — | #482 | 295 | |
| 1978 | — | #482 | 283 | |
| 1977 | — | #520 | 254 | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | #577 | 198 |
| 1975 | — | #712 | 135 | |
| 1974 | — | #771 | 109 | |
| 1973 | — | #852 | 86 | |
| 1972 | — | #887 | 82 | |
| 1971 | — | #886 | 84 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,142 | 52 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,027 | 56 | |
| 1968 | — | #898 | 64 | |
| 1967 | — | #981 | 55 | |
| 1966 | — | #860 | 71 | |
| 1965 | — | #881 | 69 | |
| 1964 | — | #945 | 65 | |
| 1963 | — | #947 | 63 | |
| 1962 | — | #779 | 95 | |
| 1961 | — | #785 | 94 | |
| 1960 | — | #782 | 95 | |
| 1959 | — | #761 | 100 | |
| 1958 | — | #777 | 92 | |
| 1957 | — | #700 | 118 | |
| 1956 | — | #745 | 97 | |
| 1955 | — | #669 | 120 | |
| 1954 | — | #633 | 135 | |
| 1953 | — | #678 | 112 | |
| 1952 | — | #608 | 134 | |
| 1951 | — | #601 | 134 | |
| 1950 | — | #578 | 138 | |
| 1949 | — | #555 | 146 | |
| 1948 | — | #563 | 140 | |
| 1947 | — | #586 | 134 | |
| 1946 | — | #573 | 125 | |
| 1945 | — | #554 | 116 | |
| 1944 | — | #639 | 93 | |
| 1943 | — | #597 | 112 | |
| 1942 | — | #629 | 101 | |
| 1941 | — | #564 | 114 | |
| 1940 | — | #555 | 113 | |
| 1939 | — | #647 | 84 | |
| 1938 | — | #559 | 108 | |
| 1937 | — | #545 | 114 | |
| 1936 | — | #562 | 105 | |
| 1935 | — | #585 | 97 | |
| 1934 | — | #611 | 94 | |
| 1933 | — | #557 | 105 | |
| 1932 | — | #565 | 109 | |
| 1931 | — | #576 | 104 | |
| 1930 | — | #553 | 119 | |
| 1929 | — | #506 | 135 | |
| 1928 | — | #558 | 120 | |
| 1927 | — | #569 | 117 | |
| 1926 | — | #543 | 125 | |
| 1925 | — | #546 | 127 | |
| 1924 | — | #538 | 138 | |
| 1923 | — | #560 | 123 | |
| 1922 | — | #509 | 148 | |
| 1921 | — | #611 | 107 | |
| 1920 | — | #559 | 122 | |
| 1919 | — | #503 | 139 | |
| 1918 | — | #519 | 133 | |
| 1917 | — | #566 | 108 | |
| 1916 | — | #545 | 110 | |
| 1915 | — | #595 | 92 | |
| 1914 | — | #609 | 68 | |
| 1913 | — | #539 | 64 | |
| 1912 | — | #510 | 59 | |
| 1911 | — | #514 | 33 | |
| 1910 | — | #440 | 39 | |
| 1909 | — | #408 | 36 | |
| 1908 | — | #413 | 33 | |
| 1907 | — | #448 | 27 | |
| 1906 | — | #465 | 23 | |
| 1905 | — | #477 | 22 | |
| 1904 | — | #417 | 25 | |
| 1903 | — | #411 | 23 | |
| 1902 | — | #404 | 25 | |
| 1901 | — | #466 | 17 | |
| 1900 | — | #393 | 32 | |
| 1899 | — | #331 | 29 | |
| 1898 | — | #409 | 23 | |
| 1897 | — | #384 | 24 | |
| 1896 | — | #417 | 22 | |
| 1895 | — | #390 | 24 | |
| 1894 | — | #291 | 36 | |
| 1893 | — | #419 | 19 | |
| 1892 | — | #384 | 24 | |
| 1891 | — | #364 | 22 | |
| 1890 | — | #270 | 41 | |
| 1889 | — | #525 | 13 | |
| 1888 | — | #324 | 31 | |
| 1887 | — | #276 | 34 | |
| 1886 | — | #288 | 35 | |
| 1885 | — | #312 | 29 | |
| 1884 | — | #369 | 23 | |
| 1883 | — | #298 | 30 | |
| 1882 | — | #283 | 37 | |
| 1881 | — | #276 | 32 | |
| 1880 | — | #267 | 40 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Isaiah was already there! It came in at #267, and was given to 40 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1889, when fewer than 14 boys a year got the name.
Where Isaiah is popular in 2008
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#1 · 1 in 63
- Hawaii#3 · 1 in 64
- Alaska#23 · 1 in 110
- West Virginia#28 · 1 in 116
- Montana#28 · 1 in 128
Best ever in a state: #1 in New Mexico, 2006.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #1 | 177 | 1 in 63 |
| Hawaii | #3 | 78 | 1 in 64 |
| Alaska | #23 | 32 | 1 in 110 |
| Montana | #28 | 33 | 1 in 128 |
| West Virginia | #28 | 75 | 1 in 116 |
| Arizona | #31 | 282 | 1 in 154 |
| Nebraska | #31 | 72 | 1 in 144 |
| Indiana | #34 | 256 | 1 in 150 |
| California | #35 | 1,518 | 1 in 167 |
| Florida | #36 | 581 | 1 in 173 |
| Maryland | #36 | 199 | 1 in 150 |
| Colorado | #39 | 165 | 1 in 180 |
| North Carolina | #39 | 319 | 1 in 175 |
| Oklahoma | #39 | 122 | 1 in 176 |
| Texas | #39 | 1,028 | 1 in 184 |
| Georgia | #40 | 328 | 1 in 187 |
| Kentucky | #40 | 165 | 1 in 143 |
| District of Columbia | #41 | 29 | 1 in 146 |
| Virginia | #41 | 247 | 1 in 174 |
| Nevada | #42 | 87 | 1 in 174 |
| Delaware | #44 | 28 | 1 in 141 |
| Oregon | #44 | 115 | 1 in 175 |
| Tennessee | #45 | 213 | 1 in 177 |
| Kansas | #46 | 98 | 1 in 173 |
| Iowa | #47 | 88 | 1 in 187 |
| Mississippi | #47 | 79 | 1 in 199 |
| South Carolina | #47 | 122 | 1 in 189 |
| Alabama | #50 | 122 | 1 in 206 |
| North Dakota | #53 | 22 | 1 in 159 |
| Minnesota | #54 | 153 | 1 in 195 |
| Washington | #54 | 167 | 1 in 223 |
| New York | #55 | 414 | 1 in 264 |
| Ohio | #55 | 332 | 1 in 194 |
| South Dakota | #55 | 24 | 1 in 174 |
| Arkansas | #56 | 71 | 1 in 214 |
| Illinois | #56 | 329 | 1 in 227 |
| Michigan | #56 | 238 | 1 in 216 |
| Maine | #58 | 26 | 1 in 196 |
| Pennsylvania | #58 | 309 | 1 in 207 |
| New Jersey | #59 | 179 | 1 in 255 |
| Idaho | #60 | 42 | 1 in 219 |
| Wisconsin | #60 | 132 | 1 in 222 |
| Connecticut | #61 | 72 | 1 in 224 |
| Missouri | #63 | 160 | 1 in 216 |
| Louisiana | #68 | 95 | 1 in 265 |
| Vermont | #68 | 10 | 1 in 194 |
| Wyoming | #68 | 11 | 1 in 193 |
| Massachusetts | #69 | 119 | 1 in 269 |
| Rhode Island | #75 | 19 | 1 in 237 |
| New Hampshire | #78 | 22 | 1 in 240 |
| Utah | #104 | 66 | 1 in 359 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Isaiah
- 1 spot since 2024 (#56 → #57)
- 6 spots since 2020 (#51 → #57)
- 8 spots since 2015 (#49 → #57)
- Biggest jump: 256 spots in 1971 (#1,142 → #886)
- Biggest drop: 201 spots in 1889 (#324 → #525)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2006 at #39 (10,459 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 17 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 30 yrs · run 1996–2025
- Top 1,000: 144 yrs · run 1880–1968
- Highest: 1 in 197 boys born in 2006 were named Isaiah (0.51%)
- Latest: 1 in 324 boys born in 2025 (0.31%)
- 36.5% of all boys named Isaiah (92,786) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 304 | #267 (1880) | #322 |
| 1890s | 264 | #270 (1890) | #366 |
| 1900s | 263 | #393 (1900) | #430 |
| 1910s | 845 | #440 (1910) | #534 |
| 1920s | 1,262 | #506 (1929) | #550 |
| 1930s | 1,039 | #545 (1937) | #576 |
| 1940s | 1,194 | #554 (1945) | #582 |
| 1950s | 1,180 | #578 (1950) | #675 |
| 1960s | 727 | #779 (1962) | #889 |
| 1970s | 1,578 | #482 (1979) | #731 |
| 1980s | 6,709 | #228 (1989) | #322 |
| 1990s | 36,586 | #51 (1999) | #135 |
| 2000s | 92,786 | #39 (2006) | #44 |
| 2010s | 76,320 | #42 (2012) | #47 |
| 2020s | 32,963 | #51 (2020) | #56 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Isaiah in 2008
Top girls' names in 2008
Top boys' names in 2008
More about 2008
girls
1,890,938 girls got a published name in 2008; 1 in 63,031 of them was named Isaiah, which outranked 76.2% of the 20,482 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #4,761Zulma31
- #4,761Zya31
- #4,761Zyla31
- #4,882Isaiah30
- #4,882Abigal30
- #4,882Adelyne30
- #4,882Adrielle30
- #5,013Aaron29
- #5,013Adi29
- #5,013Adithi29
Tied with 130 names at #4,882; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,040,150 boys got a published name in 2008; 1 in 211 of them was named Isaiah, which outranked 99.7% of the 14,625 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.