Izaiah
Last seen for girls in 2017 at #15,902 · #635 for boys in 2025, 439 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2011 · 727 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 14,899since 1984
Izaiah over time
Rank among boys' names. Izaiah has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #635 | 439 | |
| 2024 | — | #608 | 468 | |
| 2023 | — | #580 | 495 | |
| 2022 | — | #539 | 551 | |
| 2021 | — | #555 | 514 | |
| 2020 | — | #488 | 602 | |
| 2019 | — | #555 | 509 | |
| 2018 | — | #520 | 546 | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | #556 | 491 |
| 2016 | — | #551 | 520 | |
| 2015 | — | #538 | 532 | |
| 2014 | — | #461 | 637 | |
| 2013 | — | #445 | 647 | |
| 2012 | — | #400 | 729 | |
| 2011 | — | #390 | 727 | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #400 | 703 |
| 2009 | — | #400 | 744 | |
| 2008 | — | #427 | 679 | |
| 2007 | — | #441 | 635 | |
| 2006 | — | #460 | 589 | |
| 2005 | — | #469 | 534 | |
| 2004 | — | #539 | 438 | |
| 2003 | — | #541 | 426 | |
| 2002 | — | #565 | 394 | |
| 2001 | — | #595 | 334 | |
| 2000 | — | #657 | 274 | |
| 1999 | — | #771 | 206 | |
| 1998 | — | #853 | 171 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,116 | 113 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,359 | 79 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,914 | 44 | |
| 1994 | — | #2,392 | 32 | |
| 1993 | — | #3,141 | 21 | |
| 1992 | — | #3,459 | 18 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,828 | 23 | |
| 1990 | — | #5,823 | 8 | |
| 1989 | — | #5,615 | 8 | |
| 1988 | — | #7,270 | 5 | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | #6,721 | 5 | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | #4,215 | 9 | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Izaiah! It came in at #4,215, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1985–1988, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Izaiah is popular in 2014
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#186 · 1 in 649
- Nevada#282 · 1 in 1,227
- California#328 · 1 in 1,850
- Texas#350 · 1 in 1,847
- Arizona#368 · 1 in 1,879
Best ever in a state: #142 in New Mexico, 2021.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #186 | 14 | 1 in 649 |
| Nevada | #282 | 11 | 1 in 1,227 |
| California | #328 | 125 | 1 in 1,850 |
| Texas | #350 | 101 | 1 in 1,847 |
| Arizona | #368 | 20 | 1 in 1,879 |
| Massachusetts | #383 | 12 | 1 in 2,493 |
| Florida | #389 | 42 | 1 in 2,286 |
| North Carolina | #395 | 23 | 1 in 2,248 |
| Maryland | #403 | 12 | 1 in 2,352 |
| Arkansas | #411 | 7 | 1 in 2,086 |
| Colorado | #413 | 13 | 1 in 2,100 |
| Oklahoma | #415 | 11 | 1 in 1,877 |
| Minnesota | #418 | 11 | 1 in 2,547 |
| Oregon | #424 | 9 | 1 in 2,039 |
| Michigan | #430 | 19 | 1 in 2,572 |
| Nebraska | #434 | 5 | 1 in 2,074 |
| Missouri | #444 | 13 | 1 in 2,489 |
| Mississippi | #508 | 5 | 1 in 2,756 |
| Ohio | #513 | 17 | 1 in 3,546 |
| Alabama | #534 | 7 | 1 in 3,301 |
| Indiana | #536 | 11 | 1 in 3,286 |
| Pennsylvania | #540 | 16 | 1 in 3,799 |
| Iowa | #544 | 5 | 1 in 3,155 |
| Kentucky | #553 | 6 | 1 in 3,713 |
| Utah | #563 | 7 | 1 in 3,075 |
| Kansas | #565 | 5 | 1 in 3,162 |
| Illinois | #604 | 17 | 1 in 3,906 |
| Georgia | #606 | 14 | 1 in 3,930 |
| New Jersey | #610 | 10 | 1 in 4,194 |
| Washington | #690 | 8 | 1 in 4,538 |
| Virginia | #776 | 7 | 1 in 6,045 |
| New York | #794 | 17 | 1 in 6,043 |
| Louisiana | #806 | 5 | 1 in 5,041 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Izaiah
- 27 spots since 2024 (#608 → #635)
- 147 spots since 2020 (#488 → #635)
- 97 spots since 2015 (#538 → #635)
- Biggest jump: 263 spots in 1998 (#1,116 → #853)
- Biggest drop: 77 spots in 2015 (#461 → #538)
- Debuted 1984
- Peaked 2011 at #390 (727 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 28 yrs · run 1998–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,602 boys born in 2012 were named Izaiah (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,891 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #390 in 2011, was only 1 in 2,612 (0.04%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 40.5% of all boys named Izaiah (6,041) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 27 | #4,215 (1984) | #5,955 |
| 1990s | 715 | #771 (1999) | #2,366 |
| 2000s | 5,047 | #400 (2009) | #509 |
| 2010s | 6,041 | #390 (2011) | #482 |
| 2020s | 3,069 | #488 (2020) | #568 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Izaiah in 2014
Top boys' names in 2014
More about 2014
boys
1,920,871 boys got a published name in 2014; 1 in 3,015 of them was named Izaiah, which outranked 96.7% of the 14,081 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.