Jace
#10,917 for girls in 2025, 8 births · #114 for boys in 2025, 3,083 births
Given to boys 99.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2013 · 6,401 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 9 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 91,544since 1936
Jace over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,917 | 8 | #114 | 3,083 |
| 2024 | #6,932 | 16 | #114 | 3,127 |
| 2023 | #4,655 | 29 | #110 | 3,212 |
| 2022 | #5,638 | 22 | #103 | 3,531 |
| 2021 | #5,573 | 22 | #101 | 3,703 |
| 2020 | #5,168 | 24 | #96 | 3,788 |
| 2019 | #4,260 | 33 | #93 | 4,107 |
| 2018 | #4,357 | 32 | #90 | 4,304 |
| 2017 | #5,517 | 23 | #87 | 4,656 |
| 2016 | #3,996 | 37 | #76 | 5,208 |
| 2015 | #4,144 | 35 | #75 | 5,357 |
| 2014 | #3,652 | 42 | #68 | 6,301 |
| 2013 | #3,465 | 45 | #66 | 6,401 |
| 2012 | #4,121 | 36 | #85 | 4,724 |
| 2011 | #3,916 | 38 | #106 | 3,740 |
| 2010 | #5,602 | 24 | #146 | 2,678 |
| 2009 | #5,097 | 28 | #167 | 2,345 |
| 2008 | #6,799 | 19 | #180 | 2,195 |
| 2007 | #6,552 | 20 | #198 | 2,035 |
| 2006 | #4,685 | 30 | #187 | 2,144 |
| 2005 | #4,958 | 26 | #208 | 1,796 |
| 2004 | #4,387 | 31 | #229 | 1,488 |
| 2003 | #4,418 | 29 | #249 | 1,329 |
| 2002 | #4,621 | 26 | #282 | 1,070 |
| 2001 | #4,209 | 29 | #300 | 976 |
| 2000 | #4,791 | 24 | #310 | 938 |
| 1999 | #4,870 | 22 | #336 | 788 |
| 1998 | #4,142 | 27 | #379 | 667 |
| 1997 | #5,626 | 17 | #406 | 568 |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | #464 | 468 |
| 1995 | #7,514 | 11 | #523 | 376 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #567 | 326 |
| 1993 | — | #555 | 334 | |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #549 | 343 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #558 | 332 |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #549 | 334 |
| 1989 | — | #604 | 264 | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | #626 | 228 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #615 | 217 |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | #615 | 210 |
| 1985 | — | #665 | 176 | |
| 1984 | — | #735 | 140 | |
| 1983 | — | #751 | 133 | |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #849 | 109 |
| 1981 | — | #1,009 | 81 | |
| 1980 | — | #927 | 92 | |
| 1979 | — | #715 | 146 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,186 | 56 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,144 | 58 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,427 | 39 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,530 | 34 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,124 | 53 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,736 | 26 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,307 | 41 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,823 | 24 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,615 | 28 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,414 | 32 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,339 | 33 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,507 | 26 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,891 | 17 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,084 | 15 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,615 | 24 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,695 | 22 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,295 | 36 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,222 | 42 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,193 | 43 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,068 | 52 | |
| 1958 | — | #761 | 95 | |
| 1957 | — | #944 | 64 | |
| 1956 | — | #917 | 66 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,942 | 8 | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #2,680 | 9 | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #3,430 | 5 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | #2,491 | 9 | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #3,549 | 5 | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jace! It came in at #3,549, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1936–1940, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jace is popular in 1989
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#110 · 1 in 552
- North Dakota#130 · 1 in 662
- Montana#149 · 1 in 768
- Nebraska#209 · 1 in 1,832
- Oklahoma#257 · 1 in 2,055
Best ever in a state: #7 in Wyoming, 2013.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #110 | 30 | 1 in 552 |
| North Dakota | #130 | 7 | 1 in 662 |
| Montana | #149 | 6 | 1 in 768 |
| Nebraska | #209 | 6 | 1 in 1,832 |
| Oklahoma | #257 | 10 | 1 in 2,055 |
| Louisiana | #287 | 18 | 1 in 1,773 |
| Washington | #304 | 13 | 1 in 2,616 |
| Arkansas | #350 | 5 | 1 in 3,068 |
| Kansas | #360 | 5 | 1 in 3,409 |
| Colorado | #395 | 6 | 1 in 4,031 |
| Michigan | #536 | 10 | 1 in 6,943 |
| Texas | #588 | 23 | 1 in 6,439 |
| Ohio | #621 | 7 | 1 in 11,158 |
| California | #678 | 28 | 1 in 9,595 |
| Illinois | #735 | 8 | 1 in 10,850 |
| Pennsylvania | #761 | 5 | 1 in 16,282 |
| Florida | #1,000 | 5 | 1 in 17,864 |
| New York | #1,016 | 8 | 1 in 16,863 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jace
- Held #114 since 2024
- 18 spots since 2020 (#96 → #114)
- 39 spots since 2015 (#75 → #114)
- Biggest jump: 1,847 spots in 1956 (#2,764 → #917)
- Biggest drop: 307 spots in 1959 (#761 → #1,068)
- Debuted 1936
- Peaked 2013 at #66 (6,401 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 9 yrs · run 2012–2020
- Top 1,000: 49 yrs · run 1982–2025
- Highest: 1 in 296 boys born in 2013 were named Jace (0.34%)
- Latest: 1 in 554 boys born in 2025 (0.18%)
- 51.9% of all boys named Jace (47,476) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 5 | #3,549 (1936) | #3,549 |
| 1940s | 14 | #2,491 (1941) | #2,961 |
| 1950s | 308 | #761 (1958) | #1,970 |
| 1960s | 290 | #1,193 (1960) | #1,526 |
| 1970s | 505 | #715 (1979) | #1,361 |
| 1980s | 1,650 | #604 (1989) | #740 |
| 1990s | 4,536 | #336 (1999) | #489 |
| 2000s | 16,316 | #167 (2009) | #231 |
| 2010s | 47,476 | #66 (2013) | #89 |
| 2020s | 20,444 | #96 (2020) | #106 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jace in 1989
Top boys' names in 1989
More about 1989
boys
2,000,928 boys got a published name in 1989; 1 in 7,579 of them was named Jace, which outranked 93.5% of the 9,232 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.