Jace
#10,917 for girls in 2025, 8 births · #114 for boys in 2025, 3,083 births
Given to boys 99.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2013 · 6,401 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 9 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 91,544since 1936
Jace over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,917 | 8 | #114 | 3,083 |
| 2024 | #6,932 | 16 | #114 | 3,127 |
| 2023 | #4,655 | 29 | #110 | 3,212 |
| 2022 | #5,638 | 22 | #103 | 3,531 |
| 2021 | #5,573 | 22 | #101 | 3,703 |
| 2020 | #5,168 | 24 | #96 | 3,788 |
| 2019 | #4,260 | 33 | #93 | 4,107 |
| 2018 | #4,357 | 32 | #90 | 4,304 |
| 2017 | #5,517 | 23 | #87 | 4,656 |
| 2016 | #3,996 | 37 | #76 | 5,208 |
| 2015 | #4,144 | 35 | #75 | 5,357 |
| 2014 | #3,652 | 42 | #68 | 6,301 |
| 2013 | #3,465 | 45 | #66 | 6,401 |
| 2012 | #4,121 | 36 | #85 | 4,724 |
| 2011 | #3,916 | 38 | #106 | 3,740 |
| 2010 | #5,602 | 24 | #146 | 2,678 |
| 2009 | #5,097 | 28 | #167 | 2,345 |
| 2008 | #6,799 | 19 | #180 | 2,195 |
| 2007 | #6,552 | 20 | #198 | 2,035 |
| 2006 | #4,685 | 30 | #187 | 2,144 |
| 2005 | #4,958 | 26 | #208 | 1,796 |
| 2004 | #4,387 | 31 | #229 | 1,488 |
| 2003 | #4,418 | 29 | #249 | 1,329 |
| 2002 | #4,621 | 26 | #282 | 1,070 |
| 2001 | #4,209 | 29 | #300 | 976 |
| 2000 | #4,791 | 24 | #310 | 938 |
| 1999 | #4,870 | 22 | #336 | 788 |
| 1998 | #4,142 | 27 | #379 | 667 |
| 1997 | #5,626 | 17 | #406 | 568 |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | #464 | 468 |
| 1995 | #7,514 | 11 | #523 | 376 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #567 | 326 |
| 1993 | — | #555 | 334 | |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #549 | 343 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #558 | 332 |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #549 | 334 |
| 1989 | — | #604 | 264 | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | #626 | 228 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #615 | 217 |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | #615 | 210 |
| 1985 | — | #665 | 176 | |
| 1984 | — | #735 | 140 | |
| 1983 | — | #751 | 133 | |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #849 | 109 |
| 1981 | — | #1,009 | 81 | |
| 1980 | — | #927 | 92 | |
| 1979 | — | #715 | 146 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,186 | 56 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,144 | 58 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,427 | 39 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,530 | 34 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,124 | 53 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,736 | 26 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,307 | 41 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,823 | 24 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,615 | 28 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,414 | 32 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,339 | 33 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,507 | 26 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,891 | 17 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,084 | 15 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,615 | 24 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,695 | 22 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,295 | 36 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,222 | 42 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,193 | 43 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,068 | 52 | |
| 1958 | — | #761 | 95 | |
| 1957 | — | #944 | 64 | |
| 1956 | — | #917 | 66 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,942 | 8 | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #2,680 | 9 | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | #3,430 | 5 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | #2,491 | 9 | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #3,549 | 5 | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jace! It came in at #3,549, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1936–1940, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Jace is popular in 2019
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Louisiana#24 · 1 in 188
- West Virginia#46 · 1 in 193
- Delaware#52 · 1 in 170
- South Carolina#55 · 1 in 232
- Mississippi#56 · 1 in 228
Best ever in a state: #7 in Wyoming, 2013.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | #24 | 120 | 1 in 188 |
| West Virginia | #46 | 38 | 1 in 193 |
| Delaware | #52 | 19 | 1 in 170 |
| South Carolina | #55 | 89 | 1 in 232 |
| Mississippi | #56 | 56 | 1 in 228 |
| Georgia | #57 | 201 | 1 in 258 |
| Montana | #58 | 17 | 1 in 196 |
| Arkansas | #63 | 51 | 1 in 261 |
| District of Columbia | #63 | 16 | 1 in 234 |
| North Dakota | #68 | 16 | 1 in 237 |
| Missouri | #69 | 104 | 1 in 286 |
| Iowa | #70 | 49 | 1 in 294 |
| Alabama | #72 | 76 | 1 in 298 |
| Ohio | #72 | 186 | 1 in 304 |
| Tennessee | #75 | 111 | 1 in 317 |
| Kentucky | #76 | 66 | 1 in 310 |
| Oklahoma | #77 | 60 | 1 in 308 |
| North Carolina | #78 | 147 | 1 in 341 |
| Maryland | #80 | 83 | 1 in 314 |
| South Dakota | #80 | 15 | 1 in 251 |
| Florida | #81 | 267 | 1 in 355 |
| Indiana | #81 | 107 | 1 in 315 |
| Michigan | #82 | 132 | 1 in 334 |
| Pennsylvania | #82 | 170 | 1 in 329 |
| Wisconsin | #84 | 75 | 1 in 334 |
| Nebraska | #85 | 30 | 1 in 301 |
| Hawaii | #89 | 13 | 1 in 298 |
| New York | #89 | 233 | 1 in 401 |
| Utah | #89 | 54 | 1 in 358 |
| Connecticut | #97 | 40 | 1 in 331 |
| New Jersey | #97 | 97 | 1 in 410 |
| Nevada | #99 | 35 | 1 in 367 |
| Kansas | #101 | 38 | 1 in 372 |
| Texas | #103 | 386 | 1 in 452 |
| Virginia | #103 | 98 | 1 in 403 |
| Wyoming | #109 | 5 | 1 in 280 |
| Washington | #112 | 80 | 1 in 426 |
| Arizona | #114 | 78 | 1 in 429 |
| Illinois | #118 | 117 | 1 in 492 |
| Minnesota | #119 | 61 | 1 in 429 |
| Rhode Island | #126 | 8 | 1 in 418 |
| Colorado | #127 | 54 | 1 in 478 |
| New Mexico | #131 | 17 | 1 in 447 |
| Alaska | #141 | 7 | 1 in 415 |
| New Hampshire | #148 | 9 | 1 in 479 |
| Oregon | #154 | 29 | 1 in 568 |
| California | #155 | 290 | 1 in 701 |
| Massachusetts | #181 | 37 | 1 in 760 |
| Idaho | #198 | 12 | 1 in 651 |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jace
- Held #114 since 2024
- 18 spots since 2020 (#96 → #114)
- 39 spots since 2015 (#75 → #114)
- Biggest jump: 1,847 spots in 1956 (#2,764 → #917)
- Biggest drop: 307 spots in 1959 (#761 → #1,068)
- Debuted 1936
- Peaked 2013 at #66 (6,401 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 9 yrs · run 2012–2020
- Top 1,000: 49 yrs · run 1982–2025
- Highest: 1 in 296 boys born in 2013 were named Jace (0.34%)
- Latest: 1 in 554 boys born in 2025 (0.18%)
- 51.9% of all boys named Jace (47,476) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 5 | #3,549 (1936) | #3,549 |
| 1940s | 14 | #2,491 (1941) | #2,961 |
| 1950s | 308 | #761 (1958) | #1,970 |
| 1960s | 290 | #1,193 (1960) | #1,526 |
| 1970s | 505 | #715 (1979) | #1,361 |
| 1980s | 1,650 | #604 (1989) | #740 |
| 1990s | 4,536 | #336 (1999) | #489 |
| 2000s | 16,316 | #167 (2009) | #231 |
| 2010s | 47,476 | #66 (2013) | #89 |
| 2020s | 20,444 | #96 (2020) | #106 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jace in 2019
Top girls' names in 2019
Top boys' names in 2019
More about 2019
girls
1,678,366 girls got a published name in 2019; 1 in 50,860 of them was named Jace, which outranked 76.4% of the 18,024 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #4,162Tennessee34
- #4,162Zo34
- #4,162Zury34
- #4,260Jace33
- #4,260Aayla33
- #4,260Adaley33
- #4,260Addeline33
- #4,343Aarushi32
- #4,343Abriana32
- #4,343Ahri32
Tied with 82 names at #4,260; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,794,216 boys got a published name in 2019; 1 in 437 of them was named Jace, which outranked 99.3% of the 14,133 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.