Jacee
- #9,457 for girls in 2025, 10 births
- Last seen for boys in 2022 at #12,330
- Given to girls 96.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2008 · 86 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,602since 1975
Jacee over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Jacee has never cracked the top 2,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #9,457 | 10 | — | |
| 2024 | #9,556 | 10 | — | |
| 2023 | #8,989 | 11 | — | |
| 2022 | #8,542 | 12 | #12,330 | 5 |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #5,850 | 20 | — | |
| 2019 | #4,773 | 28 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #4,562 | 30 | — | |
| 2017 | #5,517 | 23 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,990 | 27 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #3,989 | 37 | — | |
| 2014 | #3,326 | 48 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,404 | 46 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,213 | 51 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,603 | 43 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #3,624 | 43 | — | |
| 2009 | #2,852 | 61 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,267 | 86 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,509 | 74 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #2,940 | 58 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,482 | 70 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,998 | 52 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,771 | 56 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,352 | 68 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,766 | 53 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,403 | 64 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #2,527 | 56 | #7,874 | 7 |
| 1998 | #2,530 | 54 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,590 | 49 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,591 | 48 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #3,152 | 36 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,848 | 42 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,681 | 29 | — | |
| 1992 | #4,236 | 24 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,817 | 27 | — | |
| 1990 | #4,523 | 21 | — | |
| 1989 | #4,522 | 20 | — | |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | — | |
| 1986 | #6,156 | 11 | — | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | — | |
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | — | |
| 1982 | #6,371 | 10 | — | |
| 1981 | #5,885 | 11 | — | |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | — | |
| 1979 | #8,061 | 7 | — | |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | — | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 | — | |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1975
The first year at least five girls were named Jacee! It came in at #7,984, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1977, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Jacee is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Jacee in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Jacee
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 99 spots since 2024 (#9,556 → #9,457)
- 3,607 spots since 2020 (#5,850 → #9,457)
- 5,468 spots since 2015 (#3,989 → #9,457)
Rise & fade · girls
33 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1975
- Peaked 2008 at #2,267 (86 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 2 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 21,988
- Highest: 1 in 21,988 girls born in 2008 were named Jacee (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 160,727 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 40.1% of all girls named Jacee (642) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 30 | #5,958 (1978) | #7,325 |
| 1980s | 94 | #4,522 (1989) | #6,711 |
| 1990s | 386 | #2,527 (1999) | #3,250 |
| 2000s | 642 | #2,267 (2008) | #2,634 |
| 2010s | 376 | #3,213 (2012) | #4,100 |
| 2020s | 74 | #5,850 (2020) | #8,562 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jacee ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: