Jacie
- #3,130 for girls in 2025, 51 births
- Last seen for boys in 2007 at #12,367
- Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 212 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,230since 1920
Jacie over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Jacie has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,130 | 51 | — | |
| 2024 | #3,013 | 54 | — | |
| 2023 | #3,014 | 55 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,313 | 48 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,751 | 62 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,682 | 62 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,752 | 61 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,107 | 52 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,530 | 70 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,269 | 84 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,937 | 104 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,868 | 108 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,689 | 124 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,189 | 86 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,909 | 104 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,468 | 154 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,687 | 132 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,508 | 154 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,381 | 175 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #1,257 | 191 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,115 | 212 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,294 | 165 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,284 | 162 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,268 | 155 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,540 | 120 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,369 | 136 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,336 | 133 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,366 | 126 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,514 | 107 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,767 | 84 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,982 | 69 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,167 | 62 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,776 | 82 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,928 | 72 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,189 | 60 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,737 | 42 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,618 | 43 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,646 | 40 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,257 | 28 | — | |
| 1986 | #4,539 | 17 | — | |
| 1985 | #3,328 | 26 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,851 | 31 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,659 | 33 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,172 | 27 | — | |
| 1981 | #4,746 | 15 | — | |
| 1980 | #4,743 | 15 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,541 | 22 | — | |
| 1978 | #4,079 | 17 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,761 | 19 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,052 | 23 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,863 | 16 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,787 | 16 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,300 | 13 | — | |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | — | |
| 1961 | #5,309 | 7 | — | |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | — | |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 | — | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | — | |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | — | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1920
The first year at least five girls were named Jacie! It came in at #4,975, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1920–1959, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jacie is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | #1,438 | 5 | 1 in 9,454 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jacie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 448 spots since 2020 (#2,682 → #3,130)
Rise & fade · girls
85 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1920
- Peaked 2005 at #1,115 (212 births)
- Births halved by 2011, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 8,716
- Highest: 1 in 8,716 girls born in 2005 were named Jacie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 31,515 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 37.9% of all girls named Jacie (1,602) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 10 | #4,975 (1920) | #5,037 |
| 1930s | 5 | #4,181 (1936) | #4,181 |
| 1940s | 5 | #5,295 (1947) | #5,295 |
| 1950s | 10 | #5,952 (1956) | #6,099 |
| 1960s | 52 | #4,019 (1963) | #5,301 |
| 1970s | 155 | #3,052 (1975) | #4,361 |
| 1980s | 275 | #2,618 (1989) | #3,456 |
| 1990s | 837 | #1,336 (1999) | #1,876 |
| 2000s | 1,602 | #1,115 (2005) | #1,370 |
| 2010s | 947 | #1,468 (2010) | #2,172 |
| 2020s | 332 | #2,682 (2020) | #2,984 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jacie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: