Jack
- #13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births
- #15 for boys in 2025, 8,748 births
- Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2021 · 9,568 births
- Debut · boys
- 204 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 114 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 756,943since 1880
Jack over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #13,208 | 6 | #15 | 8,748 |
| 2024 | #11,122 | 8 | #15 | 8,472 |
| 2023 | #8,055 | 13 | #14 | 8,715 |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | #15 | 8,936 |
| 2021 | #7,250 | 15 | #11 | 9,568 |
| 2020 | #7,559 | 14 | #21 | 8,945 |
| 2019 | #7,716 | 14 | #19 | 9,404 |
| 2018 | #11,427 | 8 | #28 | 8,894 |
| 2017 | #10,689 | 9 | #36 | 8,477 |
| 2016 | #9,411 | 11 | #38 | 8,430 |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | #40 | 8,514 |
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | #41 | 8,753 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #40 | 8,577 |
| 2012 | #10,429 | 10 | #46 | 7,941 |
| 2011 | #16,764 | 5 | #45 | 8,185 |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #45 | 8,520 |
| 2009 | #8,454 | 14 | #42 | 9,029 |
| 2008 | #8,109 | 15 | #39 | 9,897 |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | #38 | 10,671 |
| 2006 | #6,125 | 21 | #36 | 10,837 |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | #34 | 10,906 |
| 2004 | #4,816 | 27 | #42 | 9,580 |
| 2003 | #7,580 | 14 | #45 | 9,318 |
| 2002 | #7,816 | 13 | #44 | 9,000 |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 | #48 | 8,149 |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #46 | 8,125 |
| 1999 | #9,479 | 9 | #52 | 7,385 |
| 1998 | #8,016 | 11 | #61 | 6,376 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | #76 | 4,984 |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #89 | 4,245 |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #110 | 3,448 |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | #127 | 2,781 |
| 1993 | — | #143 | 2,425 | |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | #154 | 2,070 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #166 | 1,949 |
| 1990 | — | #166 | 1,838 | |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #178 | 1,716 |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 | #171 | 1,655 |
| 1987 | #4,660 | 17 | #164 | 1,656 |
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | #175 | 1,522 |
| 1985 | #5,678 | 12 | #176 | 1,523 |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | #173 | 1,483 |
| 1983 | #3,949 | 19 | #172 | 1,526 |
| 1982 | #4,945 | 14 | #166 | 1,620 |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #166 | 1,616 |
| 1980 | #5,245 | 13 | #158 | 1,627 |
| 1979 | #4,231 | 17 | #161 | 1,582 |
| 1978 | #4,079 | 17 | #156 | 1,579 |
| 1977 | #4,425 | 15 | #149 | 1,672 |
| 1976 | #4,363 | 14 | #149 | 1,662 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #142 | 1,742 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #149 | 1,648 |
| 1973 | #5,191 | 10 | #138 | 1,850 |
| 1972 | #3,543 | 17 | #142 | 1,899 |
| 1971 | #4,810 | 11 | #132 | 2,364 |
| 1970 | #3,712 | 16 | #129 | 2,564 |
| 1969 | #3,318 | 17 | #122 | 2,606 |
| 1968 | #3,789 | 13 | #110 | 2,692 |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 | #112 | 2,782 |
| 1966 | #4,493 | 9 | #107 | 2,964 |
| 1965 | #2,605 | 22 | #104 | 3,199 |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 | #99 | 3,809 |
| 1963 | #3,458 | 14 | #102 | 3,814 |
| 1962 | #3,438 | 14 | #99 | 4,170 |
| 1961 | #3,060 | 17 | #90 | 4,639 |
| 1960 | #3,212 | 15 | #85 | 4,918 |
| 1959 | #2,980 | 16 | #85 | 5,015 |
| 1958 | #3,543 | 12 | #80 | 5,301 |
| 1957 | #3,150 | 14 | #67 | 6,024 |
| 1956 | #3,186 | 14 | #66 | 6,051 |
| 1955 | #2,839 | 16 | #60 | 6,200 |
| 1954 | #2,519 | 19 | #57 | 6,475 |
| 1953 | #2,812 | 15 | #57 | 6,540 |
| 1952 | #3,796 | 9 | #52 | 6,937 |
| 1951 | #2,391 | 18 | #48 | 7,004 |
| 1950 | #2,652 | 15 | #48 | 6,840 |
| 1949 | #2,134 | 21 | #47 | 7,128 |
| 1948 | #2,701 | 14 | #43 | 7,612 |
| 1947 | #2,045 | 23 | #37 | 8,507 |
| 1946 | #2,024 | 21 | #35 | 7,801 |
| 1945 | #1,993 | 18 | #32 | 6,857 |
| 1944 | #1,867 | 21 | #30 | 7,253 |
| 1943 | #1,703 | 25 | #34 | 7,398 |
| 1942 | #1,760 | 23 | #34 | 7,365 |
| 1941 | #1,610 | 24 | #32 | 6,950 |
| 1940 | #1,792 | 20 | #29 | 7,048 |
| 1939 | #1,308 | 32 | #26 | 7,306 |
| 1938 | #1,182 | 38 | #25 | 8,144 |
| 1937 | #1,451 | 26 | #23 | 8,194 |
| 1936 | #1,640 | 21 | #20 | 8,857 |
| 1935 | #1,101 | 40 | #18 | 9,438 |
| 1934 | #1,062 | 43 | #17 | 9,985 |
| 1933 | #937 | 53 | #17 | 9,838 |
| 1932 | #989 | 51 | #17 | 10,716 |
| 1931 | #728 | 85 | #15 | 11,488 |
| 1930 | #744 | 88 | #14 | 12,430 |
| 1929 | #777 | 81 | #14 | 12,167 |
| 1928 | #721 | 96 | #15 | 12,494 |
| 1927 | #800 | 82 | #16 | 12,802 |
| 1926 | #790 | 84 | #16 | 12,195 |
| 1925 | #758 | 95 | #17 | 12,011 |
| 1924 | #864 | 75 | #17 | 11,921 |
| 1923 | #941 | 61 | #17 | 11,190 |
| 1922 | #906 | 65 | #18 | 10,847 |
| 1921 | #964 | 59 | #18 | 10,757 |
| 1920 | #939 | 60 | #20 | 9,599 |
| 1919 | #954 | 55 | #21 | 8,263 |
| 1918 | #1,184 | 40 | #21 | 8,341 |
| 1917 | #986 | 50 | #22 | 6,875 |
| 1916 | #1,059 | 43 | #26 | 6,161 |
| 1915 | #1,115 | 37 | #27 | 5,749 |
| 1914 | #1,344 | 22 | #27 | 4,485 |
| 1913 | #1,308 | 19 | #28 | 3,538 |
| 1912 | #1,178 | 20 | #28 | 2,870 |
| 1911 | #1,545 | 10 | #25 | 1,668 |
| 1910 | #1,171 | 15 | #23 | 1,576 |
| 1909 | — | #27 | 1,150 | |
| 1908 | #1,862 | 6 | #27 | 1,086 |
| 1907 | #1,821 | 6 | #26 | 1,019 |
| 1906 | #1,727 | 6 | #30 | 880 |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 | #28 | 907 |
| 1904 | #1,364 | 8 | #27 | 908 |
| 1903 | — | #28 | 831 | |
| 1902 | #1,133 | 10 | #32 | 743 |
| 1901 | — | #32 | 645 | |
| 1900 | #1,932 | 5 | #27 | 1,053 |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | #35 | 582 |
| 1898 | — | #37 | 633 | |
| 1897 | — | #42 | 497 | |
| 1896 | #1,583 | 5 | #40 | 539 |
| 1895 | #1,426 | 6 | #46 | 479 |
| 1894 | — | #47 | 441 | |
| 1893 | — | #50 | 405 | |
| 1892 | — | #54 | 401 | |
| 1891 | — | #62 | 290 | |
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | #53 | 368 |
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | #60 | 322 |
| 1888 | — | #64 | 329 | |
| 1887 | — | #68 | 251 | |
| 1886 | — | #64 | 299 | |
| 1885 | — | #61 | 295 | |
| 1884 | — | #68 | 274 | |
| 1883 | — | #65 | 242 | |
| 1882 | — | #66 | 271 | |
| 1881 | — | #73 | 197 | |
| 1880 | — | #77 | 204 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Jack was already there! It came in at #77, and was given to 204 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 300 boys a year got the name.
Where Jack is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New Hampshire#4 · 1 in 69
- Utah#4 · 1 in 94
- Vermont#5 · 1 in 51
- Massachusetts#6 · 1 in 85
- Michigan#6 · 1 in 119
Best ever in a state: #1 in Wyoming, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #4 | 65 | 1 in 69 |
| Utah | #4 | 209 | 1 in 94 |
| Vermont | #5 | 24 | 1 in 51 |
| Massachusetts | #6 | 319 | 1 in 85 |
| Michigan | #6 | 337 | 1 in 119 |
| Maine | #7 | 44 | 1 in 87 |
| Wisconsin | #7 | 201 | 1 in 117 |
| Connecticut | #8 | 140 | 1 in 94 |
| Minnesota | #8 | 218 | 1 in 112 |
| New Jersey | #10 | 333 | 1 in 119 |
| Ohio | #10 | 389 | 1 in 135 |
| Oregon | #10 | 113 | 1 in 133 |
| Idaho | #11 | 74 | 1 in 117 |
| North Dakota | #11 | 31 | 1 in 108 |
| Iowa | #12 | 100 | 1 in 138 |
| New York | #12 | 606 | 1 in 139 |
| Rhode Island | #12 | 35 | 1 in 89 |
| Illinois | #13 | 335 | 1 in 148 |
| Kansas | #13 | 94 | 1 in 149 |
| Maryland | #14 | 148 | 1 in 155 |
| Missouri | #14 | 179 | 1 in 155 |
| Alaska | #15 | 24 | 1 in 95 |
| Colorado | #15 | 185 | 1 in 145 |
| Montana | #15 | 34 | 1 in 111 |
| Pennsylvania | #15 | 363 | 1 in 144 |
| Tennessee | #16 | 237 | 1 in 155 |
| Washington | #16 | 216 | 1 in 152 |
| Indiana | #17 | 186 | 1 in 170 |
| District of Columbia | #18 | 25 | 1 in 101 |
| Nebraska | #18 | 59 | 1 in 149 |
| Virginia | #18 | 221 | 1 in 169 |
| South Carolina | #19 | 126 | 1 in 168 |
| North Carolina | #22 | 280 | 1 in 184 |
| Louisiana | #24 | 98 | 1 in 195 |
| Alabama | #25 | 114 | 1 in 189 |
| Arkansas | #27 | 70 | 1 in 180 |
| Wyoming | #27 | 12 | 1 in 91 |
| Georgia | #30 | 221 | 1 in 227 |
| Arizona | #31 | 160 | 1 in 205 |
| South Dakota | #32 | 24 | 1 in 160 |
| Kentucky | #33 | 105 | 1 in 196 |
| Oklahoma | #33 | 85 | 1 in 208 |
| Mississippi | #34 | 53 | 1 in 204 |
| Florida | #35 | 450 | 1 in 212 |
| California | #48 | 702 | 1 in 250 |
| Nevada | #52 | 49 | 1 in 230 |
| Hawaii | #53 | 15 | 1 in 195 |
| Texas | #61 | 579 | 1 in 302 |
| Delaware | #64 | 15 | 1 in 196 |
| West Virginia | #74 | 24 | 1 in 257 |
| New Mexico | #82 | 22 | 1 in 295 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jack
Momentum · boys
Rising
- Held #15 since 2024
- 6 spots since 2020 (#21 → #15)
- Biggest jump: 21 spots in 1996
- Biggest drop: 13 spots in 1958
Rise & fade · boys
141 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2021 at #11 (9,568 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 114 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 114 yrs · run 1880–1962
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 88
- Highest: 1 in 88 boys born in 1927 were named Jack (1.1%)
- Latest: 1 in 195 boys born in 2025 (0.51%)
- Its best rank, #11 in 2021, was only 1 in 183 (0.55%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1920s
- 15.3% of all boys named Jack (115,983) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #14 (1930) → #178 (1989) → #11 (2021)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,684 | #60 (1889) | #67 |
| 1890s | 4,635 | #35 (1899) | #47 |
| 1900s | 9,222 | #26 (1907) | #28 |
| 1910s | 49,526 | #21 (1918) | #25 |
| 1920s | 115,983 | #14 (1929) | #17 |
| 1930s | 96,396 | #14 (1930) | #19 |
| 1940s | 73,919 | #29 (1940) | #35 |
| 1950s | 62,387 | #48 (1951) | #62 |
| 1960s | 35,593 | #85 (1960) | #103 |
| 1970s | 18,562 | #129 (1970) | #145 |
| 1980s | 15,944 | #158 (1980) | #170 |
| 1990s | 37,501 | #52 (1999) | #114 |
| 2000s | 95,512 | #34 (2005) | #41 |
| 2010s | 85,695 | #19 (2019) | #38 |
| 2020s | 53,384 | #11 (2021) | #15 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jack ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: