Jacqueline
#558 for girls in 2025, 541 births · Last seen for boys in 2013 at #12,136
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1964 · 11,975 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 75 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 426,088since 1891
Jacqueline over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #558 | 541 | — | |
| 2024 | #585 | 516 | — | |
| 2023 | #537 | 564 | — | |
| 2022 | #503 | 629 | — | |
| 2021 | #473 | 660 | — | |
| 2020 | #443 | 696 | — | |
| 2019 | #382 | 821 | — | |
| 2018 | #340 | 941 | — | |
| 2017 | #350 | 927 | — | |
| 2016 | #280 | 1,134 | — | |
| 2015 | #258 | 1,232 | — | |
| 2014 | #248 | 1,309 | — | |
| 2013 | #239 | 1,331 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #243 | 1,321 | — | |
| 2011 | #202 | 1,560 | — | |
| 2010 | #171 | 1,809 | — | |
| 2009 | #163 | 1,967 | — | |
| 2008 | #152 | 2,264 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #133 | 2,621 | #8,915 | 8 |
| 2006 | #118 | 2,859 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #116 | 2,850 | #6,634 | 11 |
| 2004 | #108 | 3,066 | #7,536 | 9 |
| 2003 | #100 | 3,400 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #81 | 3,754 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #70 | 4,301 | #5,667 | 12 |
| 2000 | #64 | 5,037 | #5,588 | 12 |
| 1999 | #79 | 3,901 | #6,042 | 10 |
| 1998 | #95 | 3,500 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #77 | 4,278 | #4,246 | 15 |
| 1996 | #69 | 4,862 | #4,022 | 16 |
| 1995 | #70 | 4,793 | #4,791 | 12 |
| 1994 | #65 | 5,183 | #3,596 | 18 |
| 1993 | #74 | 4,516 | #3,246 | 20 |
| 1992 | #76 | 4,689 | #3,604 | 17 |
| 1991 | #70 | 4,989 | #3,636 | 16 |
| 1990 | #67 | 5,237 | #2,308 | 30 |
| 1989 | #64 | 5,444 | #1,891 | 39 |
| 1988 | #62 | 5,544 | #1,989 | 32 |
| 1987 | #54 | 5,627 | #1,938 | 32 |
| 1986 | #57 | 5,036 | #1,791 | 34 |
| 1985 | #60 | 5,250 | #1,916 | 30 |
| 1984 | #56 | 5,549 | #2,364 | 21 |
| 1983 | #53 | 5,405 | #1,864 | 29 |
| 1982 | #54 | 5,493 | #1,999 | 27 |
| 1981 | #67 | 4,334 | #2,779 | 16 |
| 1980 | #81 | 3,879 | #2,617 | 18 |
| 1979 | #80 | 3,740 | #5,355 | 6 |
| 1978 | #81 | 3,576 | #2,205 | 21 |
| 1977 | #92 | 3,148 | #2,202 | 21 |
| 1976 | #99 | 2,948 | #3,095 | 12 |
| 1975 | #90 | 3,314 | #2,637 | 15 |
| 1974 | #83 | 3,573 | #2,674 | 14 |
| 1973 | #88 | 3,500 | #2,311 | 17 |
| 1972 | #79 | 3,803 | #2,158 | 18 |
| 1971 | #75 | 4,784 | #2,126 | 19 |
| 1970 | #66 | 5,576 | #2,399 | 15 |
| 1969 | #62 | 5,920 | #1,680 | 24 |
| 1968 | #50 | 6,745 | #1,836 | 19 |
| 1967 | #52 | 6,954 | #1,312 | 33 |
| 1966 | #47 | 8,360 | #1,540 | 25 |
| 1965 | #47 | 9,413 | #1,335 | 33 |
| 1964 | #37 | 11,975 | #1,096 | 48 |
| 1963 | #51 | 8,562 | #1,255 | 38 |
| 1962 | #44 | 9,832 | #1,588 | 25 |
| 1961 | #37 | 10,983 | #1,406 | 32 |
| 1960 | #85 | 5,654 | #2,042 | 16 |
| 1959 | #111 | 4,324 | #1,865 | 19 |
| 1958 | #99 | 4,786 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1957 | #91 | 5,288 | #2,093 | 15 |
| 1956 | #78 | 6,062 | #3,535 | 6 |
| 1955 | #73 | 6,041 | #1,791 | 19 |
| 1954 | #68 | 6,522 | #2,743 | 9 |
| 1953 | #58 | 7,128 | #2,709 | 9 |
| 1952 | #58 | 6,938 | #2,251 | 12 |
| 1951 | #56 | 6,915 | #1,683 | 20 |
| 1950 | #55 | 6,455 | #1,941 | 15 |
| 1949 | #58 | 6,040 | #2,606 | 9 |
| 1948 | #58 | 5,838 | #2,443 | 10 |
| 1947 | #59 | 6,011 | #3,096 | 7 |
| 1946 | #62 | 5,083 | #2,030 | 13 |
| 1945 | #63 | 3,989 | #2,009 | 12 |
| 1944 | #64 | 3,975 | #1,988 | 13 |
| 1943 | #65 | 4,189 | #2,074 | 13 |
| 1942 | #69 | 3,831 | #2,042 | 13 |
| 1941 | #73 | 3,388 | #2,207 | 11 |
| 1940 | #76 | 3,215 | #1,519 | 20 |
| 1939 | #72 | 3,388 | #1,879 | 14 |
| 1938 | #69 | 3,633 | #1,613 | 18 |
| 1937 | #70 | 3,400 | #2,197 | 11 |
| 1936 | #66 | 3,362 | #1,872 | 14 |
| 1935 | #79 | 3,115 | #2,127 | 12 |
| 1934 | #80 | 3,038 | #2,266 | 11 |
| 1933 | #86 | 2,756 | #1,997 | 13 |
| 1932 | #85 | 2,875 | #1,716 | 18 |
| 1931 | #78 | 3,134 | — | |
| 1930 | #74 | 3,414 | #2,293 | 12 |
| 1929 | #87 | 2,970 | #2,002 | 15 |
| 1928 | #97 | 2,739 | #2,659 | 10 |
| 1927 | #115 | 2,447 | — | |
| 1926 | #119 | 2,245 | #3,708 | 6 |
| 1925 | #135 | 1,990 | #3,155 | 8 |
| 1924 | #148 | 1,771 | — | |
| 1923 | #165 | 1,402 | #3,822 | 6 |
| 1922 | #201 | 1,021 | — | |
| 1921 | #239 | 757 | — | |
| 1920 | #282 | 540 | — | |
| 1919 | #317 | 396 | — | |
| 1918 | #386 | 286 | — | |
| 1917 | #410 | 237 | — | |
| 1916 | #480 | 176 | — | |
| 1915 | #455 | 182 | — | |
| 1914 | #478 | 132 | — | |
| 1913 | #427 | 133 | — | |
| 1912 | #511 | 89 | — | |
| 1911 | #585 | 53 | — | |
| 1910 | #543 | 56 | — | |
| 1909 | #535 | 50 | — | |
| 1908 | #476 | 57 | — | |
| 1907 | #535 | 45 | — | |
| 1906 | #742 | 24 | — | |
| 1905 | #656 | 29 | — | |
| 1904 | #727 | 23 | — | |
| 1903 | #931 | 14 | — | |
| 1902 | #818 | 18 | — | |
| 1901 | #747 | 19 | — | |
| 1900 | #833 | 20 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,099 | 9 | — | |
| 1898 | #920 | 14 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,555 | 5 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,292 | 7 | — | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,091 | 8 | — | |
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | #1,093 | 7 | — | |
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Jacqueline! It came in at #1,093, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1892, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Jacqueline is popular in 1934
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maine#20 · 1 in 79
- Rhode Island#34 · 1 in 106
- New Hampshire#36 · 1 in 102
- Michigan#42 · 1 in 172
- Connecticut#50 · 1 in 174
Best ever in a state: #9 in Mississippi, 1964.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #20 | 79 | 1 in 79 |
| Rhode Island | #34 | 39 | 1 in 106 |
| New Hampshire | #36 | 29 | 1 in 102 |
| Michigan | #42 | 213 | 1 in 172 |
| Connecticut | #50 | 53 | 1 in 174 |
| Massachusetts | #51 | 168 | 1 in 166 |
| Vermont | #51 | 16 | 1 in 149 |
| Missouri | #52 | 112 | 1 in 241 |
| Indiana | #53 | 99 | 1 in 227 |
| Illinois | #55 | 214 | 1 in 231 |
| Nebraska | #55 | 39 | 1 in 262 |
| California | #56 | 146 | 1 in 234 |
| Wyoming | #59 | 7 | 1 in 204 |
| Washington | #61 | 35 | 1 in 261 |
| Delaware | #62 | 6 | 1 in 231 |
| Maryland | #63 | 45 | 1 in 256 |
| Wisconsin | #65 | 79 | 1 in 280 |
| New York | #66 | 310 | 1 in 267 |
| Ohio | #68 | 154 | 1 in 292 |
| Pennsylvania | #69 | 283 | 1 in 251 |
| Minnesota | #71 | 66 | 1 in 288 |
| New Jersey | #72 | 75 | 1 in 315 |
| District of Columbia | #73 | 14 | 1 in 282 |
| Montana | #77 | 13 | 1 in 274 |
| North Dakota | #78 | 21 | 1 in 269 |
| South Dakota | #83 | 18 | 1 in 289 |
| Colorado | #84 | 25 | 1 in 316 |
| Iowa | #84 | 46 | 1 in 393 |
| Virginia | #91 | 65 | 1 in 353 |
| West Virginia | #93 | 47 | 1 in 390 |
| Oklahoma | #96 | 49 | 1 in 461 |
| Oregon | #97 | 12 | 1 in 419 |
| Louisiana | #107 | 55 | 1 in 377 |
| Idaho | #113 | 8 | 1 in 423 |
| Kansas | #117 | 24 | 1 in 549 |
| Hawaii | #121 | 7 | 1 in 427 |
| Utah | #126 | 9 | 1 in 490 |
| Georgia | #136 | 52 | 1 in 583 |
| Kentucky | #143 | 42 | 1 in 650 |
| Alabama | #149 | 46 | 1 in 638 |
| Florida | #149 | 19 | 1 in 614 |
| North Carolina | #152 | 51 | 1 in 715 |
| South Carolina | #159 | 27 | 1 in 770 |
| Arizona | #191 | 5 | 1 in 737 |
| Tennessee | #201 | 24 | 1 in 1,115 |
| Arkansas | #205 | 19 | 1 in 988 |
| Mississippi | #232 | 17 | 1 in 1,256 |
| Texas | #247 | 49 | 1 in 1,167 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jacqueline
- 27 spots since 2024 (#585 → #558)
- 115 spots since 2020 (#443 → #558)
- 300 spots since 2015 (#258 → #558)
- Biggest jump: 635 spots in 1898 (#1,555 → #920)
- Biggest drop: 179 spots in 1899 (#920 → #1,099)
- Debuted 1891
- Peaked 1964 at #37 (11,975 births)
- Births halved by 1969, 5 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 75 yrs · run 1960–2003
- Top 1,000: 127 yrs · run 1900–2025
- Highest: 1 in 158 girls born in 1964 were named Jacqueline (0.63%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,971 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 19.8% of all girls named Jacqueline (84,398) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 55 | #920 (1898) | #1,219 |
| 1900s | 299 | #476 (1908) | #700 |
| 1910s | 1,740 | #317 (1919) | #459 |
| 1920s | 17,882 | #87 (1929) | #159 |
| 1930s | 32,115 | #66 (1936) | #76 |
| 1940s | 45,559 | #58 (1949) | #65 |
| 1950s | 60,459 | #55 (1950) | #75 |
| 1960s | 84,398 | #37 (1964) | #51 |
| 1970s | 37,962 | #66 (1970) | #83 |
| 1980s | 51,561 | #53 (1983) | #61 |
| 1990s | 45,948 | #65 (1994) | #74 |
| 2000s | 32,119 | #64 (2000) | #111 |
| 2010s | 12,385 | #171 (2010) | #271 |
| 2020s | 3,606 | #443 (2020) | #517 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jacqueline in 1934
Top girls' names in 1934
Top boys' names in 1934
More about 1934
girls
1,044,225 girls got a published name in 1934; 1 in 344 of them was named Jacqueline, which outranked 98.4% of the 4,973 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,032,596 boys got a published name in 1934; 1 in 93,872 of them was named Jacqueline, which outranked 46.1% of the 4,205 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,121Willim12
- #2,121Wilmot12
- #2,121Yvonne12
- #2,266Jacqueline11
- #2,266Aime11
- #2,266Alexis11
- #2,266Almer11
- #2,393Abbott10
- #2,393Addie10
- #2,393Alger10
Tied with 126 names at #2,266; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.