Jaden
- #6,838 for girls in 2025, 16 births
- #421 for boys in 2025, 768 births
- Given to boys 85.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2007 · 6,262 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 9 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 81,469since 1974
Jaden over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,838 | 16 | #421 | 768 |
| 2024 | #4,473 | 31 | #394 | 828 |
| 2023 | #5,126 | 25 | #352 | 933 |
| 2022 | #4,793 | 28 | #319 | 1,053 |
| 2021 | #4,413 | 31 | #306 | 1,089 |
| 2020 | #4,263 | 32 | #290 | 1,170 |
| 2019 | #3,272 | 48 | #267 | 1,362 |
| 2018 | #3,497 | 44 | #246 | 1,506 |
| 2017 | #2,964 | 55 | #229 | 1,652 |
| 2016 | #2,287 | 83 | #219 | 1,786 |
| 2015 | #2,294 | 81 | #201 | 2,018 |
| 2014 | #2,176 | 87 | #173 | 2,467 |
| 2013 | #1,514 | 145 | #141 | 2,784 |
| 2012 | #1,408 | 163 | #139 | 2,835 |
| 2011 | #979 | 262 | #100 | 3,811 |
| 2010 | #756 | 365 | #91 | 4,523 |
| 2009 | #539 | 560 | #101 | 4,169 |
| 2008 | #470 | 677 | #88 | 5,193 |
| 2007 | #335 | 994 | #74 | 6,262 |
| 2006 | #303 | 1,086 | #88 | 4,947 |
| 2005 | #282 | 1,187 | #88 | 4,849 |
| 2004 | #248 | 1,286 | #83 | 5,151 |
| 2003 | #226 | 1,448 | #82 | 5,182 |
| 2002 | #241 | 1,324 | #87 | 4,651 |
| 2001 | #302 | 1,046 | #114 | 3,353 |
| 2000 | #383 | 752 | #154 | 2,520 |
| 1999 | #458 | 579 | #202 | 1,690 |
| 1998 | #762 | 282 | #328 | 827 |
| 1997 | #971 | 201 | #454 | 484 |
| 1996 | #998 | 188 | #517 | 392 |
| 1995 | #1,197 | 143 | #553 | 338 |
| 1994 | #1,487 | 106 | #630 | 271 |
| 1993 | #2,012 | 69 | #1,007 | 118 |
| 1992 | #2,576 | 48 | #1,090 | 102 |
| 1991 | #3,301 | 33 | #1,632 | 51 |
| 1990 | #4,230 | 23 | #1,840 | 42 |
| 1989 | #5,049 | 17 | #1,766 | 43 |
| 1988 | #8,391 | 8 | #2,090 | 30 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #2,057 | 29 |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #2,360 | 23 |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | #2,019 | 28 |
| 1984 | #10,422 | 5 | #2,036 | 26 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #2,912 | 15 |
| 1982 | #8,224 | 7 | #2,972 | 15 |
| 1981 | — | #3,601 | 11 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,256 | 13 | |
| 1979 | — | #2,379 | 20 | |
| 1978 | — | #4,554 | 7 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,665 | 16 | |
| 1976 | — | #4,418 | 7 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | #3,558 | 9 | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1974
The first year at least five boys were named Jaden! It came in at #3,558, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1975, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaden is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #172 | 7 | 1 in 549 |
| Maryland | #243 | 23 | 1 in 996 |
| Nevada | #267 | 11 | 1 in 1,027 |
| Nebraska | #293 | 8 | 1 in 1,102 |
| Florida | #314 | 62 | 1 in 1,541 |
| Connecticut | #326 | 9 | 1 in 1,467 |
| New York | #333 | 53 | 1 in 1,593 |
| New Jersey | #344 | 24 | 1 in 1,657 |
| Arkansas | #353 | 9 | 1 in 1,398 |
| Alabama | #360 | 15 | 1 in 1,435 |
| Virginia | #365 | 22 | 1 in 1,693 |
| Minnesota | #373 | 15 | 1 in 1,633 |
| California | #375 | 92 | 1 in 1,907 |
| Illinois | #375 | 28 | 1 in 1,770 |
| Pennsylvania | #387 | 27 | 1 in 1,936 |
| Texas | #393 | 90 | 1 in 1,945 |
| Indiana | #395 | 18 | 1 in 1,759 |
| Iowa | #399 | 8 | 1 in 1,729 |
| Michigan | #409 | 21 | 1 in 1,914 |
| South Carolina | #414 | 12 | 1 in 1,767 |
| Mississippi | #415 | 7 | 1 in 1,548 |
| Utah | #441 | 10 | 1 in 1,966 |
| Washington | #446 | 16 | 1 in 2,050 |
| Tennessee | #452 | 17 | 1 in 2,163 |
| Massachusetts | #467 | 10 | 1 in 2,702 |
| Kansas | #468 | 7 | 1 in 2,007 |
| Georgia | #482 | 22 | 1 in 2,283 |
| Missouri | #489 | 12 | 1 in 2,318 |
| Arizona | #491 | 14 | 1 in 2,337 |
| North Carolina | #539 | 18 | 1 in 2,859 |
| Oklahoma | #552 | 7 | 1 in 2,526 |
| Kentucky | #569 | 7 | 1 in 2,934 |
| Wisconsin | #570 | 8 | 1 in 2,929 |
| Ohio | #577 | 17 | 1 in 3,090 |
| Louisiana | #672 | 6 | 1 in 3,188 |
| Colorado | #680 | 7 | 1 in 3,836 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaden
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 131 spots since 2020 (#290 → #421)
- Biggest jump: 377 spots in 1994
- Biggest drop: 42 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · boys
33 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1974
- Peaked 2007 at #74 (6,262 births)
- Births halved by 2012, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 9 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 9 yrs · run 2002–2008
- Top 1,000: 32 yrs · run 1994–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 331
- Highest: 1 in 331 boys born in 2007 were named Jaden (0.30%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,224 boys born in 2025 (0.04%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 56.8% of all boys named Jaden (46,277) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 59 | #2,379 (1979) | #3,515 |
| 1980s | 233 | #1,766 (1989) | #2,507 |
| 1990s | 4,315 | #202 (1999) | #825 |
| 2000s | 46,277 | #74 (2007) | #96 |
| 2010s | 24,744 | #91 (2010) | #181 |
| 2020s | 5,841 | #290 (2020) | #347 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaden ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: