Jael
- #1,388 for girls in 2025, 157 births
- #1,315 for boys in 2025, 147 births
- Given to girls 57.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2012 · 206 births
- Debut · girls
- 14 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,561since 1957
Jael over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,388 | 157 | #1,315 | 147 |
| 2024 | #1,466 | 149 | #1,364 | 138 |
| 2023 | #1,578 | 134 | #1,294 | 148 |
| 2022 | #1,515 | 143 | #1,457 | 124 |
| 2021 | #1,600 | 131 | #1,325 | 140 |
| 2020 | #1,632 | 127 | #1,177 | 163 |
| 2019 | #1,441 | 154 | #1,347 | 133 |
| 2018 | #1,313 | 173 | #1,364 | 129 |
| 2017 | #1,505 | 147 | #1,321 | 136 |
| 2016 | #1,545 | 145 | #1,295 | 140 |
| 2015 | #1,501 | 152 | #1,359 | 128 |
| 2014 | #1,427 | 159 | #1,375 | 124 |
| 2013 | #1,321 | 177 | #1,128 | 161 |
| 2012 | #1,196 | 206 | #983 | 203 |
| 2011 | #1,446 | 156 | #1,411 | 117 |
| 2010 | #1,420 | 161 | #1,219 | 145 |
| 2009 | #1,695 | 131 | #1,173 | 154 |
| 2008 | #1,421 | 167 | #1,348 | 127 |
| 2007 | #1,381 | 175 | #1,206 | 146 |
| 2006 | #1,918 | 105 | #1,479 | 103 |
| 2005 | #2,122 | 87 | #1,334 | 113 |
| 2004 | #2,135 | 84 | #1,565 | 84 |
| 2003 | #1,845 | 100 | #1,845 | 64 |
| 2002 | #1,887 | 94 | #1,998 | 55 |
| 2001 | #2,151 | 76 | #2,306 | 43 |
| 2000 | #1,938 | 87 | #3,423 | 24 |
| 1999 | #2,018 | 77 | #3,834 | 19 |
| 1998 | #2,188 | 65 | #3,597 | 20 |
| 1997 | #2,450 | 53 | #3,455 | 20 |
| 1996 | #2,041 | 68 | #5,187 | 11 |
| 1995 | #2,552 | 49 | #3,100 | 22 |
| 1994 | #2,503 | 50 | #4,290 | 14 |
| 1993 | #3,108 | 37 | #4,020 | 15 |
| 1992 | #2,869 | 41 | #5,236 | 10 |
| 1991 | #3,207 | 34 | #5,096 | 10 |
| 1990 | #3,078 | 36 | — | |
| 1989 | #2,879 | 38 | #6,941 | 6 |
| 1988 | #3,165 | 31 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #2,780 | 35 | #4,573 | 9 |
| 1986 | #3,360 | 26 | #4,457 | 9 |
| 1985 | #3,170 | 28 | #4,333 | 9 |
| 1984 | #3,144 | 27 | — | |
| 1983 | #3,431 | 23 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #3,647 | 22 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,986 | 29 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,853 | 20 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #2,525 | 36 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #4,079 | 17 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,911 | 18 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,905 | 12 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,259 | 21 | — | |
| 1974 | #5,011 | 11 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,635 | 17 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,523 | 12 | — | |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,489 | 10 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | #3,150 | 14 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1957
The first year at least five girls were named Jael! It came in at #3,150, and was given to 14 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1958–1964, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Jael is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Massachusetts#564 · 1 in 2,670
- Tennessee#813 · 1 in 4,009
- Maryland#840 · 1 in 3,997
- Florida#912 · 1 in 5,104
- Georgia#915 · 1 in 4,521
Best ever in a state: #468 in Nevada, 2009.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | #564 | 9 | 1 in 2,670 |
| Tennessee | #813 | 8 | 1 in 4,009 |
| Maryland | #840 | 5 | 1 in 3,997 |
| Florida | #912 | 17 | 1 in 5,104 |
| Georgia | #915 | 10 | 1 in 4,521 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,108 | 7 | 1 in 6,670 |
| Ohio | #1,134 | 7 | 1 in 6,753 |
| New Jersey | #1,168 | 5 | 1 in 7,100 |
| North Carolina | #1,281 | 6 | 1 in 7,747 |
| Texas | #1,314 | 19 | 1 in 8,450 |
| New York | #1,654 | 7 | 1 in 11,190 |
| California | #1,948 | 10 | 1 in 16,172 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jael
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 244 spots since 2020 (#1,632 → #1,388)
Rise & fade · girls
55 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1957
- Peaked 2012 at #1,196 (206 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 8,549
- Highest: 1 in 8,549 girls born in 2012 were named Jael (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 10,237 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 35.7% of all girls named Jael (1,630) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2024
- Mostly boys until 2023, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 14 | #3,150 (1957) | #3,150 |
| 1960s | 25 | #4,489 (1968) | #5,121 |
| 1970s | 156 | #2,525 (1979) | #4,631 |
| 1980s | 279 | #2,780 (1987) | #3,242 |
| 1990s | 510 | #2,018 (1999) | #2,601 |
| 2000s | 1,106 | #1,381 (2007) | #1,849 |
| 2010s | 1,630 | #1,196 (2012) | #1,412 |
| 2020s | 841 | #1,388 (2025) | #1,530 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jael ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: