Jaelynn
- #1,692 for girls in 2025, 121 births
- Last seen for boys in 2024 at #9,894
- Given to girls 98.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 593 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,354since 1984
Jaelynn over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Jaelynn has never cracked the top 500 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,692 | 121 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,559 | 136 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | #1,310 | 173 | #8,255 | 9 |
| 2022 | #1,111 | 223 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #1,002 | 255 | #8,825 | 8 |
| 2020 | #984 | 259 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2019 | #927 | 286 | — | |
| 2018 | #845 | 321 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #768 | 361 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #658 | 444 | #8,816 | 8 |
| 2015 | #597 | 498 | — | |
| 2014 | #599 | 491 | #7,048 | 11 |
| 2013 | #597 | 476 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #547 | 543 | #6,306 | 13 |
| 2011 | #505 | 582 | — | |
| 2010 | #503 | 593 | #6,698 | 12 |
| 2009 | #542 | 557 | #6,436 | 13 |
| 2008 | #521 | 591 | #6,763 | 12 |
| 2007 | #592 | 505 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #794 | 344 | — | |
| 2005 | #863 | 293 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #1,034 | 225 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,067 | 209 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #1,165 | 176 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #1,132 | 185 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,425 | 129 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,532 | 111 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,124 | 68 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,977 | 40 | — | |
| 1996 | #3,237 | 36 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,022 | 38 | — | |
| 1994 | #3,448 | 32 | — | |
| 1993 | #7,038 | 12 | — | |
| 1992 | #6,652 | 13 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | — | |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | — | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | — | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1984
The first year at least five girls were named Jaelynn! It came in at #7,398, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1985–1988, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jaelynn is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Missouri#926 · 1 in 4,860
- Washington#1,046 · 1 in 5,772
- Pennsylvania#1,108 · 1 in 6,670
- North Carolina#1,281 · 1 in 7,747
- Florida#1,436 · 1 in 9,640
Best ever in a state: #187 in Maine, 2011.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri | #926 | 5 | 1 in 4,860 |
| Washington | #1,046 | 5 | 1 in 5,772 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,108 | 7 | 1 in 6,670 |
| North Carolina | #1,281 | 6 | 1 in 7,747 |
| Florida | #1,436 | 9 | 1 in 9,640 |
| Ohio | #1,438 | 5 | 1 in 9,454 |
| Texas | #1,615 | 14 | 1 in 11,467 |
| California | #1,651 | 13 | 1 in 12,440 |
| New York | #1,830 | 6 | 1 in 13,055 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaelynn
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 708 spots since 2020 (#984 → #1,692)
- Biggest jump: 202 spots in 2007
- Biggest drop: 110 spots in 2017
Rise & fade · girls
26 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1984
- Peaked 2010 at #503 (593 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 16 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 16 yrs · run 2005–2020
Share of babies · girls
1 in 2,998
- Highest: 1 in 2,998 girls born in 2010 were named Jaelynn (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 13,283 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 49.1% of all girls named Jaelynn (4,595) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 21 | #7,398 (1984) | #9,024 |
| 1990s | 357 | #1,532 (1999) | #4,469 |
| 2000s | 3,214 | #521 (2008) | #914 |
| 2010s | 4,595 | #503 (2010) | #655 |
| 2020s | 1,167 | #984 (2020) | #1,276 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaelynn ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: