Jaiden
- #6,325 for girls in 2025, 18 births
- #617 for boys in 2025, 454 births
- Given to boys 80.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2009 · 2,271 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 33,302since 1991
Jaiden over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,325 | 18 | #617 | 454 |
| 2024 | #4,669 | 29 | #563 | 528 |
| 2023 | #7,640 | 14 | #503 | 603 |
| 2022 | #5,793 | 21 | #454 | 678 |
| 2021 | #3,801 | 39 | #417 | 737 |
| 2020 | #3,061 | 52 | #396 | 773 |
| 2019 | #3,788 | 39 | #359 | 916 |
| 2018 | #2,610 | 66 | #313 | 1,087 |
| 2017 | #2,964 | 55 | #305 | 1,148 |
| 2016 | #2,149 | 90 | #292 | 1,237 |
| 2015 | #1,894 | 107 | #268 | 1,364 |
| 2014 | #1,493 | 149 | #236 | 1,568 |
| 2013 | #1,408 | 162 | #213 | 1,766 |
| 2012 | #1,096 | 225 | #207 | 1,833 |
| 2011 | #871 | 300 | #187 | 2,069 |
| 2010 | #708 | 405 | #174 | 2,209 |
| 2009 | #565 | 541 | #171 | 2,271 |
| 2008 | #520 | 592 | #172 | 2,338 |
| 2007 | #431 | 760 | #192 | 2,119 |
| 2006 | #465 | 682 | #214 | 1,738 |
| 2005 | #467 | 653 | #224 | 1,565 |
| 2004 | #429 | 704 | #259 | 1,274 |
| 2003 | #414 | 727 | #308 | 973 |
| 2002 | #508 | 541 | #374 | 705 |
| 2001 | #571 | 451 | #475 | 494 |
| 2000 | #739 | 313 | #603 | 326 |
| 1999 | #966 | 214 | #691 | 243 |
| 1998 | #1,312 | 135 | #1,044 | 129 |
| 1997 | #1,845 | 80 | #2,126 | 41 |
| 1996 | #2,630 | 47 | #1,958 | 45 |
| 1995 | #4,099 | 25 | #2,923 | 24 |
| 1994 | #5,984 | 15 | #2,847 | 25 |
| 1993 | #8,052 | 10 | #5,360 | 10 |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #6,519 | 7 |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1991
The first year at least five boys were named Jaiden! It came in at #6,519, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1991–1992, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaiden is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Mississippi#333 · 1 in 1,204
- Louisiana#376 · 1 in 1,472
- Oregon#398 · 1 in 1,673
- Florida#421 · 1 in 2,077
- New Jersey#429 · 1 in 2,209
Best ever in a state: #76 in Mississippi, 2011.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #333 | 9 | 1 in 1,204 |
| Louisiana | #376 | 13 | 1 in 1,472 |
| Oregon | #398 | 9 | 1 in 1,673 |
| Florida | #421 | 46 | 1 in 2,077 |
| New Jersey | #429 | 18 | 1 in 2,209 |
| Nevada | #443 | 6 | 1 in 1,882 |
| Georgia | #464 | 23 | 1 in 2,184 |
| Alabama | #525 | 9 | 1 in 2,391 |
| Virginia | #525 | 14 | 1 in 2,661 |
| Illinois | #532 | 18 | 1 in 2,753 |
| Texas | #533 | 61 | 1 in 2,870 |
| Pennsylvania | #546 | 17 | 1 in 3,074 |
| South Carolina | #552 | 8 | 1 in 2,650 |
| California | #558 | 54 | 1 in 3,250 |
| Kentucky | #569 | 7 | 1 in 2,934 |
| Maryland | #571 | 8 | 1 in 2,862 |
| Tennessee | #592 | 12 | 1 in 3,064 |
| Michigan | #601 | 13 | 1 in 3,092 |
| New York | #601 | 25 | 1 in 3,377 |
| Indiana | #711 | 8 | 1 in 3,958 |
| North Carolina | #718 | 12 | 1 in 4,289 |
| Arizona | #781 | 7 | 1 in 4,675 |
| Ohio | #801 | 10 | 1 in 5,253 |
| Missouri | #869 | 5 | 1 in 5,562 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaiden
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 221 spots since 2020 (#396 → #617)
- Biggest jump: 353 spots in 1999
- Biggest drop: 60 spots in 2024
Rise & fade · boys
18 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1991
- Peaked 2009 at #171 (2,271 births)
- Births halved by 2018, 9 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 27 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1999–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 869
- Highest: 1 in 869 boys born in 2010 were named Jaiden (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,762 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #171 in 2009, was only 1 in 873 (0.11%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 45.6% of all boys named Jaiden (15,197) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1999
- Mostly girls until 1998, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 529 | #691 (1999) | #3,545 |
| 2000s | 13,803 | #171 (2009) | #299 |
| 2010s | 15,197 | #174 (2010) | #255 |
| 2020s | 3,773 | #396 (2020) | #492 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaiden ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: