Jaime
#4,067 for girls in 2025, 35 births · #657 for boys in 2025, 420 births
Given to boys 58.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1980 · 1,462 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 71,491since 1916
Jaime over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,067 | 35 | #657 | 420 |
| 2024 | #4,560 | 30 | #608 | 468 |
| 2023 | #3,386 | 47 | #583 | 492 |
| 2022 | #3,536 | 44 | #593 | 480 |
| 2021 | #2,892 | 58 | #615 | 453 |
| 2020 | #3,015 | 53 | #561 | 499 |
| 2019 | #3,272 | 48 | #542 | 521 |
| 2018 | #2,387 | 76 | #515 | 550 |
| 2017 | #2,779 | 61 | #480 | 608 |
| 2016 | #2,902 | 58 | #465 | 657 |
| 2015 | #2,590 | 69 | #485 | 609 |
| 2014 | #2,412 | 75 | #471 | 618 |
| 2013 | #2,108 | 90 | #425 | 688 |
| 2012 | #2,265 | 83 | #398 | 733 |
| 2011 | #2,103 | 91 | #381 | 765 |
| 2010 | #2,258 | 85 | #363 | 814 |
| 2009 | #1,639 | 136 | #331 | 963 |
| 2008 | #1,762 | 125 | #320 | 1,043 |
| 2007 | #1,332 | 182 | #280 | 1,227 |
| 2006 | #1,173 | 207 | #279 | 1,241 |
| 2005 | #1,168 | 197 | #263 | 1,256 |
| 2004 | #942 | 255 | #273 | 1,194 |
| 2003 | #898 | 265 | #262 | 1,262 |
| 2002 | #853 | 270 | #258 | 1,263 |
| 2001 | #797 | 296 | #250 | 1,338 |
| 2000 | #736 | 314 | #262 | 1,262 |
| 1999 | #626 | 380 | #241 | 1,322 |
| 1998 | #566 | 434 | #240 | 1,294 |
| 1997 | #553 | 423 | #246 | 1,212 |
| 1996 | #481 | 499 | #230 | 1,312 |
| 1995 | #430 | 603 | #227 | 1,299 |
| 1994 | #439 | 574 | #208 | 1,394 |
| 1993 | #390 | 653 | #211 | 1,427 |
| 1992 | #374 | 685 | #215 | 1,428 |
| 1991 | #349 | 740 | #215 | 1,446 |
| 1990 | #310 | 883 | #215 | 1,436 |
| 1989 | #301 | 866 | #206 | 1,395 |
| 1988 | #266 | 950 | #208 | 1,256 |
| 1987 | #239 | 1,108 | #210 | 1,185 |
| 1986 | #217 | 1,219 | #202 | 1,214 |
| 1985 | #175 | 1,558 | #205 | 1,184 |
| 1984 | #182 | 1,505 | #200 | 1,175 |
| 1983 | #158 | 1,781 | #196 | 1,222 |
| 1982 | #137 | 2,193 | #187 | 1,350 |
| 1981 | #124 | 2,385 | #177 | 1,410 |
| 1980 | #116 | 2,647 | #167 | 1,462 |
| 1979 | #97 | 3,086 | #178 | 1,357 |
| 1978 | #70 | 4,003 | #184 | 1,279 |
| 1977 | #46 | 5,906 | #174 | 1,363 |
| 1976 | #29 | 7,838 | #168 | 1,402 |
| 1975 | #263 | 914 | #179 | 1,274 |
| 1974 | #606 | 259 | #202 | 1,093 |
| 1973 | #748 | 186 | #204 | 1,064 |
| 1972 | #808 | 167 | #219 | 1,010 |
| 1971 | #750 | 195 | #228 | 1,032 |
| 1970 | #706 | 220 | #249 | 937 |
| 1969 | #796 | 167 | #260 | 799 |
| 1968 | #861 | 141 | #254 | 786 |
| 1967 | #826 | 147 | #273 | 715 |
| 1966 | #813 | 150 | #273 | 725 |
| 1965 | #982 | 111 | #288 | 679 |
| 1964 | #1,085 | 101 | #302 | 693 |
| 1963 | #993 | 115 | #311 | 643 |
| 1962 | #960 | 122 | #300 | 665 |
| 1961 | #947 | 130 | #299 | 668 |
| 1960 | #1,097 | 96 | #310 | 639 |
| 1959 | #921 | 128 | #309 | 628 |
| 1958 | #1,007 | 106 | #319 | 581 |
| 1957 | #1,274 | 68 | #363 | 442 |
| 1956 | #1,160 | 80 | #373 | 397 |
| 1955 | #1,334 | 57 | #372 | 376 |
| 1954 | #1,518 | 44 | #417 | 295 |
| 1953 | #1,671 | 35 | #446 | 257 |
| 1952 | #2,126 | 23 | #492 | 205 |
| 1951 | #1,842 | 28 | #525 | 169 |
| 1950 | #1,794 | 28 | #545 | 155 |
| 1949 | #1,917 | 25 | #566 | 143 |
| 1948 | #2,701 | 14 | #617 | 120 |
| 1947 | #2,530 | 16 | #615 | 122 |
| 1946 | #2,482 | 15 | #729 | 80 |
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | #692 | 77 |
| 1944 | — | #888 | 51 | |
| 1943 | — | #933 | 51 | |
| 1942 | — | #933 | 50 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,066 | 37 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,067 | 37 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,141 | 32 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,109 | 34 | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | #1,212 | 30 |
| 1936 | — | #1,271 | 27 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,247 | 29 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,213 | 30 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,013 | 40 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,286 | 28 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,078 | 39 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,053 | 43 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,138 | 37 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,413 | 27 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,692 | 21 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,432 | 26 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,313 | 13 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,964 | 17 | |
| 1923 | — | #3,175 | 8 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,240 | 14 | |
| 1921 | — | #3,214 | 8 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,231 | 14 | |
| 1919 | — | #3,115 | 8 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,699 | 10 | |
| 1917 | — | #3,545 | 6 | |
| 1916 | — | #3,177 | 7 | |
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Jaime! It came in at #3,177, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1916–1917, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaime is popular in 1989
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#92 · 1 in 415
- Texas#98 · 1 in 461
- California#107 · 1 in 483
- Connecticut#144 · 1 in 1,108
- Arizona#145 · 1 in 721
Best ever in a state: #71 in California, 1977.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #92 | 28 | 1 in 415 |
| Texas | #98 | 321 | 1 in 461 |
| California | #107 | 556 | 1 in 483 |
| Connecticut | #144 | 20 | 1 in 1,108 |
| Arizona | #145 | 42 | 1 in 721 |
| Rhode Island | #169 | 5 | 1 in 1,310 |
| Illinois | #182 | 75 | 1 in 1,157 |
| Washington | #200 | 25 | 1 in 1,360 |
| Colorado | #223 | 15 | 1 in 1,612 |
| New Jersey | #238 | 29 | 1 in 1,899 |
| Kansas | #251 | 9 | 1 in 1,894 |
| Massachusetts | #258 | 15 | 1 in 2,917 |
| New York | #276 | 68 | 1 in 1,984 |
| Florida | #282 | 46 | 1 in 1,942 |
| Wisconsin | #304 | 10 | 1 in 3,310 |
| Oregon | #309 | 7 | 1 in 2,779 |
| Oklahoma | #320 | 8 | 1 in 2,569 |
| Pennsylvania | #330 | 22 | 1 in 3,700 |
| District of Columbia | #361 | 8 | 1 in 1,642 |
| Utah | #364 | 5 | 1 in 3,313 |
| Maryland | #413 | 7 | 1 in 4,584 |
| Indiana | #528 | 5 | 1 in 7,923 |
| Missouri | #532 | 5 | 1 in 7,549 |
| Michigan | #536 | 10 | 1 in 6,943 |
| Virginia | #550 | 6 | 1 in 6,977 |
| Georgia | #562 | 8 | 1 in 6,182 |
| Ohio | #569 | 8 | 1 in 9,763 |
| North Carolina | #652 | 5 | 1 in 9,250 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jaime
- 49 spots since 2024 (#608 → #657)
- 96 spots since 2020 (#561 → #657)
- 172 spots since 2015 (#485 → #657)
- Biggest jump: 196 spots in 1945 (#888 → #692)
- Biggest drop: 54 spots in 2021 (#561 → #615)
- Debuted 1916
- Peaked 1980 at #167 (1,462 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 33 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 84 yrs · run 1942–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,119 boys born in 1976 were named Jaime (0.09%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,067 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #167 in 1980, was only 1 in 1,220 (0.08%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 19.0% of all boys named Jaime (13,570) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1986, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 31 | #2,699 (1918) | #3,134 |
| 1920s | 185 | #1,138 (1929) | #2,081 |
| 1930s | 332 | #1,013 (1933) | #1,162 |
| 1940s | 768 | #566 (1949) | #811 |
| 1950s | 3,505 | #309 (1959) | #416 |
| 1960s | 7,012 | #254 (1968) | #287 |
| 1970s | 11,811 | #168 (1976) | #199 |
| 1980s | 12,853 | #167 (1980) | #196 |
| 1990s | 13,570 | #208 (1994) | #225 |
| 2000s | 12,049 | #250 (2001) | #278 |
| 2010s | 6,563 | #363 (2010) | #453 |
| 2020s | 2,812 | #561 (2020) | #603 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Jaime in 1989
Top girls' names in 1989
Top boys' names in 1989
More about 1989
girls
1,843,552 girls got a published name in 1989; 1 in 2,129 of them was named Jaime, which outranked 97.9% of the 14,550 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,000,928 boys got a published name in 1989; 1 in 1,434 of them was named Jaime, which outranked 97.8% of the 9,232 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.