Jake

Last seen for girls in 2016 at #16,215 · #457 for boys in 2025, 682 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
2000 · 4,091 births
Debut · boys
96 births
In top 100 · boys
5 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · boys
129,322
since 1880

Jake over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201947peak #96, 2000boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#457682
2024—#421748
2023—#410782
2022—#406790
2021—#337969
2020—#3201,036
2019—#2941,175
2018—#2631,379
2017—#2491,503
2016#16,2155#2421,586
2015—#2071,922
2014—#1902,171
2013—#1662,450
2012#14,9626#1532,679
2011—#1293,110
2010—#1153,440
2009#10,67910#1253,386
2008#17,5045#1113,795
2007—#1123,882
2006#9,90111#1084,028
2005—#1034,153
2004#7,82814#984,473
2003#9,67110#984,406
2002—#1023,792
2001#13,5216#1003,838
2000#11,8017#964,091
1999#11,3857#973,936
1998#11,1387#1023,788
1997#9,0179#1013,840
1996#9,5818#1143,449
1995#8,7669#1083,509
1994#5,98415#1063,468
1993#9,5598#1113,197
1992#9,4918#1192,929
1991#10,2717#1192,772
1990#7,88010#1402,227
1989—#1531,964
1988#5,89513#1661,706
1987#7,9878#1661,639
1986#5,75712#1711,553
1985#10,6775#2211,071
1984#10,4225#278746
1983—#269771
1982—#299670
1981—#321595
1980—#332567
1979—#355495
1978—#362449
1977#9,6525#368445
1976—#370427
1975—#429334
1974—#456309
1973—#441314
1972—#480266
1971—#623176
1970—#662153
1969—#673138
1968—#675124
1967—#726104
1966—#672121
1965—#631144
1964—#665134
1963—#631154
1962—#638147
1961—#617166
1960—#625155
1959—#638147
1958—#613157
1957—#619154
1956—#648137
1955—#625141
1954—#562169
1953—#555163
1952—#532174
1951—#507179
1950—#485192
1949—#486185
1948—#498174
1947—#492187
1946—#457193
1945—#462165
1944—#464172
1943—#491159
1942—#438198
1941—#426190
1940—#435177
1939—#419184
1938—#420183
1937—#430172
1936—#392194
1935—#411179
1934—#398192
1933—#384199
1932—#392205
1931—#383214
1930—#382221
1929—#362245
1928—#374243
1927—#355272
1926—#357266
1925—#330306
1924—#332306
1923—#317330
1922—#314332
1921—#299360
1920—#296362
1919—#295334
1918—#274377
1917#3,7137#306299
1916—#262362
1915—#254355
1914—#261274
1913—#250227
1912—#256187
1911—#241110
1910—#184148
1909—#198109
1908—#185115
1907—#185117
1906—#21383
1905—#19392
1904—#20778
1903—#17593
1902—#171102
1901—#18379
1900—#172121
1899—#18476
1898—#145117
1897—#154102
1896—#18588
1895—#17191
1894—#17686
1893—#20866
1892—#140116
1891—#16478
1890—#18672
1889—#134107
1888—#143107
1887—#14090
1886—#14595
1885—#135100
1884—#14892
1883—#12996
1882—#14297
1881—#13292
1880—#14196
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Jake was already there! It came in at #141, and was given to 96 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1893–1896, when fewer than 92 boys a year got the name.

Where Jake is popular in 1947

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedWIMichigan: #508 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 15,247 boysMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedINOhio: #420 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 11,849 boysOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #567 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 13,270 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedWVVirginia: #411 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 6,385 boysVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: #144 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 691 boysNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedARTennessee: #257 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 2,806 boysTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: #275 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 2,877 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #275 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 2,766 boysOKLouisiana: #275 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 2,126 boysLAMississippi: #283 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 2,650 boysMSAlabama: #380 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,992 boysALGeorgia: #319 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 3,753 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Jake, so not publishedHITexas: #578 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 7,543 boysTXFlorida: #381 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 5,760 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. New Mexico#144 · 1 in 691
  2. Tennessee#257 · 1 in 2,806
  3. Louisiana#275 · 1 in 2,126
  4. Oklahoma#275 · 1 in 2,766
  5. South Carolina#275 · 1 in 2,877

Best ever in a state: #36 in New Jersey, 2003.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Mexico#144131 in 691
Tennessee#257151 in 2,806
Louisiana#275161 in 2,126
Oklahoma#27591 in 2,766
South Carolina#275101 in 2,877
Mississippi#283111 in 2,650
Georgia#319121 in 3,753
Alabama#38081 in 4,992
Florida#38151 in 5,760
Virginia#41161 in 6,385
Ohio#42081 in 11,849
Michigan#50851 in 15,247
California#56791 in 13,270
Texas#578131 in 7,543
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Jake
Momentum · boys
Falling
  • 36 spots since 2024 (#421 → #457)
  • 137 spots since 2020 (#320 → #457)
  • 250 spots since 2015 (#207 → #457)
  • Biggest jump: 143 spots in 1972 (#623 → #480)
  • Biggest drop: 69 spots in 2022 (#337 → #406)
Rise & fade · boys
120 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2000 at #96 (4,091 births)
  • Births halved by 2015, 15 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 5 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 5 yrs · run 1999–2001
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 444
  • Highest: 1 in 444 boys born in 2004 were named Jake (0.23%)
  • Latest: 1 in 2,505 boys born in 2025 (0.04%)
  • Its best rank, #96 in 2000, was only 1 in 480 (0.21%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2000s
  • 30.8% of all boys named Jake (39,844) were born in this decade
  • Comeback: #129 (1883) → #726 (1967) → #96 (2000)
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s972#129 (1883)#139
1890s892#140 (1892)#171
1900s989#171 (1902)#188
1910s2,673#184 (1910)#258
1920s3,022#296 (1920)#334
1930s1,943#382 (1930)#401
1940s1,800#426 (1941)#465
1950s1,613#485 (1950)#578
1960s1,387#617 (1961)#655
1970s3,368#355 (1979)#455
1980s11,282#153 (1989)#238
1990s33,115#97 (1999)#112
2000s39,844#96 (2000)#105
2010s21,415#115 (2010)#201
2020s5,007#320 (2020)#392

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Jake in 1947

boys
#492
187 births · 1 in 9,784 boys

Top boys' names in 1947

  1. #1James94,767
  2. #2Robert91,655
  3. #3John88,324
  4. #4William67,002
  5. #5Richard58,532
  6. #6David57,810
  7. #7Michael50,506
  8. #8Thomas44,842
  9. #9Charles40,781
  10. #10Larry34,946
  11. #492Jake187
More about 1947

boys

1,829,599 boys got a published name in 1947; 1 in 9,784 of them was named Jake, which outranked 88.5% of the 4,266 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 34.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jake
  1. #489Jerrold189
  2. #490Charley188
  3. #490Tomas188
  4. #492Jake187
  5. #492Christian187
  6. #492Jackson187
  7. #495Riley186
  8. #496Levi184
  9. #496Mary184

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1946
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,271Brock#2,271 → #1,000
  2. ↑ 586Shawn#1,509 → #923
  3. ↑ 500Jed#1,475 → #975
  4. ↑ 358Jody#935 → #577
  5. ↑ 355Deryl#1,355 → #1,000
Fallers
  1. ↓ 497Hurley#952 → #1,449
  2. ↓ 393Prentice#878 → #1,271
  3. ↓ 362Darvin#935 → #1,297
  4. ↓ 310Lary#826 → #1,136
  5. ↓ 303Judith#856 → #1,159

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1947 →