Jaleen
- Last seen for girls in 2014 at #11,931
- Last seen for boys in 2019 at #12,145
- Given to boys 52.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2001 · 42 births
- Debut · boys
- 12 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 380since 1992
Jaleen over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | #12,145 | 5 | |
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | — | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | — | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | — | |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #9,231 | 12 | — | |
| 2009 | #7,679 | 16 | #8,985 | 8 |
| 2008 | #6,799 | 19 | #7,187 | 11 |
| 2007 | #13,924 | 7 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #8,237 | 14 | #6,460 | 12 |
| 2005 | #5,800 | 21 | #6,634 | 11 |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 | #6,976 | 10 |
| 2003 | #7,207 | 15 | #5,558 | 13 |
| 2002 | #6,129 | 18 | #3,349 | 26 |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | #2,346 | 42 |
| 2000 | #6,487 | 16 | #2,736 | 33 |
| 1999 | #8,805 | 10 | #3,279 | 24 |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | #2,599 | 32 |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | #2,750 | 28 |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | #3,202 | 22 |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | #2,685 | 27 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | #2,347 | 33 |
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | #3,501 | 18 |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | #4,564 | 12 |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | — | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | — | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | — | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | #9,545 | 6 | — | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | — | |
| 1977 | #7,567 | 7 | — | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #5,642 | 7 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #6,009 | 6 | — | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1962 | #4,011 | 11 | — | |
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | #4,918 | 7 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1992
The first year at least five boys were named Jaleen! It came in at #4,564, and was given to 12 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2010, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jaleen is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Jaleen in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Jaleen
Momentum · boys
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2019
Rise & fade · boys
9 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1992
- Peaked 2001 at #2,346 (42 births)
- Births halved by 2003, 2 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 46,259
- Highest: 1 in 46,259 boys born in 2001 were named Jaleen (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 358,843 boys born in 2019 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 51.6% of all boys named Jaleen (196) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2019
- Mostly girls until 2018, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 196 | #2,347 (1994) | #3,116 |
| 2000s | 173 | #2,346 (2001) | #6,002 |
| 2010s | 11 | #10,808 (2011) | #11,477 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jaleen ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: