Jamie

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1977 · 12,895 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
23 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
270,936
since 1884

Jamie over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank18801900192019401960198020002020peak #18, 1977peak #62, 1976girlsboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#857316#577508
2024#718392#622455
2023#782360#600473
2022#733397#623449
2021#696414#624443
2020#707396#714351
2019#569534#739326
2018#615489#721332
2017#608498#767306
2016#497629#816281
2015#498639#812279
2014#493635#780296
2013#491610#762296
2012#434719#843254
2011#438715#796278
2010#377841#686342
2009#3071,067#668367
2008#2631,308#664365
2007#2491,397#662362
2006#2411,413#582422
2005#2181,598#550435
2004#1991,726#534442
2003#1701,924#546412
2002#1641,970#529426
2001#1671,945#496463
2000#1552,156#502455
1999#1292,537#444519
1998#1123,066#403607
1997#1033,241#373656
1996#963,599#354686
1995#933,770#328791
1994#873,982#284954
1993#794,254#2591,111
1992#754,702#2491,159
1991#605,781#2321,286
1990#556,509#2271,321
1989#526,845#1971,474
1988#457,187#1881,470
1987#397,916#1781,541
1986#349,234#1821,468
1985#2711,038#1671,630
1984#319,761#1541,764
1983#2811,025#1531,773
1982#2911,039#1312,091
1981#2810,982#1182,356
1980#2411,529#1052,845
1979#1912,156#883,240
1978#2010,982#952,864
1977#1812,895#823,447
1976#1812,539#624,621
1975#684,233#624,573
1974#973,020#684,086
1973#1032,954#703,913
1972#1142,810#723,680
1971#1183,054#963,231
1970#1203,202#1252,641
1969#1212,902#1791,568
1968#1202,688#1931,223
1967#1402,511#2171,031
1966#1382,656#225961
1965#1402,748#242944
1964#1692,314#2251,115
1963#1602,550#255897
1962#1522,786#266820
1961#1712,337#285733
1960#1802,202#289738
1959#1961,824#284774
1958#2311,312#296644
1957#2381,276#363442
1956#2671,029#444288
1955#2411,145#460259
1954#266987#456253
1953#277897#492204
1952#306691#603137
1951#340545#74587
1950#371468#73687
1949#398401#68998
1948#404386#666103
1947#451327#77179
1946#418337#81964
1945#479226#67180
1944#674122#78264
1943#605154#73278
1942#679120#87656
1941#80281#97143
1940#82774#99442
1939#89162#97642
1938#83072#99241
1937#90458#1,11934
1936#97949#87349
1935#98449#84455
1934#95552#95644
1933#98549#93745
1932#83068#1,00443
1931#83068#98345
1930#98356#1,15137
1929#1,06447#1,07841
1928#97458#1,05743
1927#1,02356#1,14539
1926#83677#93153
1925#97658#1,22534
1924#1,05854#1,22335
1923#87171#1,10142
1922#93263#1,10741
1921#95560#1,19936
1920#90864#1,34829
1919#82373#1,13937
1918#89464#1,17235
1917#1,05445#1,29128
1916#91555#1,09635
1915#85059#1,08235
1914#1,03433#1,15325
1913#88136#1,14620
1912#86034#1,41712
1911#1,17115#98212
1910#1,11016#1,1938
1909#77327#89311
1908#1,04415—
1907#99015—
1906#91716#1,2535
1905#76123#8369
1904#1,09211#8109
1903#1,2049—
1902#90315—
1901#72320—
1900#83320#1,1626
1899#87814—
1898#1,04711—
1897#1,0949#1,0575
1896#1,2138#9826
1895#1,05310—
1894#1,0619—
1893#1,0239—
1892#95810—
1891#83911—
1890#79112—
1889——
1888#1,2765—
1887#1,1475—
1886——
1885——
1884#1,0245—
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1884

The first year at least five girls were named Jamie! It came in at #1,024, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1884–1889, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Jamie is popular in 2025

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNHWashington: #586 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,624 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #835 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,296 girlsMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedILWisconsin: #612 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,894 girlsWIMichigan: #589 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,749 girlsMINew York: #704 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 3,406 girlsNYMassachusetts: #761 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,005 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedINOhio: #644 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 3,151 girlsOHPennsylvania: #1,108 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,670 girlsPANew Jersey: #846 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,438 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #788 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 4,256 girlsCAUtah: #605 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,846 girlsUTColorado: #789 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,888 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNEMissouri: #926 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,860 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedWVVirginia: #662 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,067 girlsVAMaryland: #549 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,221 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedDEArizona: #909 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,703 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #780 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,874 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #697 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,956 girlsOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedLAMississippi: #441 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,483 girlsMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedALGeorgia: #1,213 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,458 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Jamie, so not publishedHITexas: #840 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 4,587 girlsTXFlorida: #912 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 5,104 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#441 · 1 in 1,483
  2. Maryland#549 · 1 in 2,221
  3. Washington#586 · 1 in 2,624
  4. Michigan#589 · 1 in 2,749
  5. Utah#605 · 1 in 2,846

Best ever in a state: #2 in Wyoming, 1977.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Mississippi#44161 in 1,483
Maryland#54991 in 2,221
Washington#586111 in 2,624
Michigan#589131 in 2,749
Utah#60561 in 2,846
Wisconsin#61271 in 2,894
Ohio#644151 in 3,151
Virginia#662111 in 3,067
Oklahoma#69751 in 2,956
New York#704231 in 3,406
Massachusetts#76161 in 4,005
North Carolina#780121 in 3,874
California#788381 in 4,256
Colorado#78961 in 3,888
Minnesota#83551 in 4,296
Texas#840351 in 4,587
New Jersey#84681 in 4,438
Arizona#90961 in 4,703
Florida#912171 in 5,104
Missouri#92651 in 4,860
Pennsylvania#1,10871 in 6,670
Georgia#1,21371 in 6,458
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See every state's top names →

See more about Jamie
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 150 spots since 2020 (#707 → #857)
  • Biggest jump: 331 spots in 1905
  • Biggest drop: 337 spots in 1910
Rise & fade · girls
93 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1884
  • Peaked 1977 at #18 (12,895 births)
  • Births halved by 1991, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 23 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 23 yrs · run 1974–1996
  • Top 1,000: 120 yrs · run 1930–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 117
  • Highest: 1 in 117 girls born in 1976 were named Jamie (0.86%)
  • Latest: 1 in 5,086 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
  • Its best rank, #18 in 1977, was only 1 in 119 (0.84%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1980s
  • 35.6% of all girls named Jamie (96,556) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2021
  • Mostly girls until 2020, mostly boys since
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s15#1,024 (1884)#1,149
1890s103#791 (1890)#996
1900s171#723 (1901)#924
1910s430#823 (1919)#959
1920s608#836 (1926)#960
1930s583#830 (1938)#917
1940s2,228#398 (1949)#574
1950s10,174#196 (1959)#273
1960s25,694#120 (1968)#149
1970s67,845#18 (1977)#70
1980s96,556#24 (1980)#34
1990s41,441#55 (1990)#89
2000s16,504#155 (2000)#213
2010s6,309#377 (2010)#502
2020s2,275#696 (2021)#749

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Want to check a specific year?

See where Jamie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: