Jamiel
- Last seen for girls in 1984 at #9,144
- #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
- Given to boys 97.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1981 · 27 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 864since 1969
Jamiel over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Jamiel has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #12,008 | 5 | |
| 2024 | — | #9,894 | 7 | |
| 2023 | — | #4,886 | 20 | |
| 2022 | — | #9,823 | 7 | |
| 2021 | — | #8,166 | 9 | |
| 2020 | — | #7,034 | 11 | |
| 2019 | — | #8,889 | 8 | |
| 2018 | — | #6,036 | 14 | |
| 2017 | — | #5,788 | 15 | |
| 2016 | — | #9,664 | 7 | |
| 2015 | — | #7,066 | 11 | |
| 2014 | — | #7,048 | 11 | |
| 2013 | — | #10,728 | 6 | |
| 2012 | — | #6,306 | 13 | |
| 2011 | — | #5,945 | 14 | |
| 2010 | — | #4,366 | 22 | |
| 2009 | — | #5,102 | 18 | |
| 2008 | — | #5,249 | 17 | |
| 2007 | — | #4,127 | 24 | |
| 2006 | — | #4,370 | 21 | |
| 2005 | — | #6,226 | 12 | |
| 2004 | — | #3,534 | 26 | |
| 2003 | — | #6,258 | 11 | |
| 2002 | — | #3,909 | 21 | |
| 2001 | — | #4,476 | 17 | |
| 2000 | — | #3,640 | 22 | |
| 1999 | — | #4,341 | 16 | |
| 1998 | — | #4,197 | 16 | |
| 1997 | — | #4,059 | 16 | |
| 1996 | — | #4,185 | 15 | |
| 1995 | — | #3,559 | 18 | |
| 1994 | — | #3,751 | 17 | |
| 1993 | — | #3,501 | 18 | |
| 1992 | — | #3,459 | 18 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,753 | 24 | |
| 1990 | — | #3,166 | 19 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,618 | 15 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,437 | 24 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,731 | 12 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,510 | 21 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,710 | 18 | |
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 | #2,437 | 20 |
| 1983 | — | #2,208 | 23 | |
| 1982 | — | #3,692 | 11 | |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | #1,996 | 27 |
| 1980 | — | #2,444 | 20 | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #2,104 | 24 |
| 1978 | — | #4,554 | 7 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,361 | 19 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,508 | 17 | |
| 1975 | — | #3,428 | 10 | |
| 1974 | — | #3,558 | 9 | |
| 1973 | — | #3,694 | 8 | |
| 1972 | — | #2,819 | 12 | |
| 1971 | — | #3,370 | 9 | |
| 1970 | — | #3,836 | 7 | |
| 1969 | — | #4,404 | 5 | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1969
The first year at least five boys were named Jamiel! It came in at #4,404, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1969–1970, when fewer than 8 boys a year got the name.
Where Jamiel is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Jamiel in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Jamiel
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 2,114 spots since 2024 (#9,894 → #12,008)
- 4,974 spots since 2020 (#7,034 → #12,008)
- 4,942 spots since 2015 (#7,066 → #12,008)
Rise & fade · boys
12 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1969
- Peaked 1981 at #1,996 (27 births)
- Births halved by 1982, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 66,340
- Highest: 1 in 66,340 boys born in 1981 were named Jamiel (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 341,615 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1980s
- 22.1% of all boys named Jamiel (191) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5 | #4,404 (1969) | #4,404 |
| 1970s | 122 | #2,104 (1979) | #3,223 |
| 1980s | 191 | #1,996 (1981) | #2,778 |
| 1990s | 177 | #2,753 (1991) | #3,697 |
| 2000s | 189 | #3,534 (2004) | #4,689 |
| 2010s | 121 | #4,366 (2010) | #7,184 |
| 2020s | 59 | #4,886 (2023) | #8,635 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jamiel ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: