Jamin
- Last seen for girls in 2007 at #17,636
- #3,379 for boys in 2025, 34 births
- Given to boys 96.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1979 · 135 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 3,446since 1964
Jamin over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Jamin has never cracked the top 700 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,379 | 34 | |
| 2024 | — | #3,272 | 36 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,712 | 30 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,873 | 44 | |
| 2021 | — | #3,497 | 32 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,570 | 30 | |
| 2019 | — | #3,347 | 34 | |
| 2018 | — | #3,373 | 33 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,891 | 41 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,726 | 44 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,684 | 45 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,754 | 43 | |
| 2013 | — | #2,763 | 42 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,238 | 58 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,798 | 42 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,986 | 69 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,861 | 78 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,981 | 71 | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | #1,700 | 89 |
| 2006 | — | #1,596 | 91 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,603 | 85 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,516 | 88 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,497 | 86 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,529 | 81 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,743 | 65 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,758 | 63 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,531 | 73 | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #2,126 | 43 |
| 1997 | — | #1,964 | 46 | |
| 1996 | — | #2,073 | 41 | |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 | #2,055 | 40 |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #2,082 | 39 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #1,554 | 58 |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | #1,914 | 42 |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | #1,677 | 49 |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 | #1,809 | 43 |
| 1989 | — | #1,567 | 51 | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | #1,296 | 63 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #1,379 | 53 |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | #1,153 | 67 |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | #1,083 | 73 |
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 | #951 | 86 |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #908 | 94 |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #840 | 111 |
| 1981 | — | #875 | 103 | |
| 1980 | #6,319 | 10 | #764 | 131 |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | #745 | 135 |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #874 | 97 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #796 | 115 |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | #911 | 83 |
| 1975 | — | #1,084 | 60 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,135 | 52 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,586 | 30 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,473 | 33 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,466 | 34 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,743 | 25 | |
| 1969 | — | #4,404 | 5 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,576 | 11 | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #3,601 | 6 | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1964
The first year at least five boys were named Jamin! It came in at #3,601, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1965–1967, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Jamin is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | #773 | 7 | 1 in 4,523 |
| New York | #1,760 | 5 | 1 in 16,885 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Jamin
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 107 spots since 2024 (#3,272 → #3,379)
- 191 spots since 2020 (#3,570 → #3,379)
- 695 spots since 2015 (#2,684 → #3,379)
- Biggest jump: 173 spots in 1976
- Biggest drop: 132 spots in 1985
Rise & fade · boys
15 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1964
- Peaked 1979 at #745 (135 births)
- Births halved by 1986, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 9 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 1976–1984
Share of babies · boys
1 in 12,752
- Highest: 1 in 12,752 boys born in 1979 were named Jamin (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 50,238 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1980s
- 24.1% of all boys named Jamin (832) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22 | #2,576 (1968) | #3,527 |
| 1970s | 664 | #745 (1979) | #1,181 |
| 1980s | 832 | #764 (1980) | #1,082 |
| 1990s | 474 | #1,531 (1999) | #1,879 |
| 2000s | 797 | #1,497 (2003) | #1,678 |
| 2010s | 451 | #1,986 (2010) | #2,756 |
| 2020s | 206 | #2,873 (2022) | #3,384 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jamin ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: