Jammie
- Last seen for girls in 2014 at #11,931
- Last seen for boys in 2017 at #10,775
- Given to girls 62.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1976 · 251 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,046since 1915
Jammie over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | #10,775 | 6 | |
| 2016 | — | #12,185 | 5 | |
| 2015 | — | #10,644 | 6 | |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | — | |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #10,728 | 6 |
| 2012 | #14,962 | 6 | #12,274 | 5 |
| 2011 | #11,181 | 9 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | #10,766 | 6 |
| 2009 | #8,454 | 14 | #7,692 | 10 |
| 2008 | #8,529 | 14 | #7,698 | 10 |
| 2007 | #9,007 | 13 | #8,915 | 8 |
| 2006 | #8,715 | 13 | #7,998 | 9 |
| 2005 | #7,500 | 15 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #7,391 | 15 | #6,976 | 10 |
| 2003 | #7,207 | 15 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #7,444 | 14 | #6,088 | 11 |
| 2001 | #6,619 | 16 | #3,842 | 21 |
| 2000 | #4,981 | 23 | #5,040 | 14 |
| 1999 | #5,424 | 19 | #3,480 | 22 |
| 1998 | #5,123 | 20 | #4,873 | 13 |
| 1997 | #5,010 | 20 | #3,877 | 17 |
| 1996 | #3,942 | 27 | #3,678 | 18 |
| 1995 | #3,670 | 29 | #4,052 | 15 |
| 1994 | #2,701 | 45 | #3,911 | 16 |
| 1993 | #2,639 | 46 | #2,786 | 25 |
| 1992 | #2,576 | 48 | #2,128 | 36 |
| 1991 | #2,163 | 61 | #2,190 | 33 |
| 1990 | #2,081 | 63 | #2,373 | 29 |
| 1989 | #1,667 | 82 | #1,919 | 38 |
| 1988 | #1,465 | 93 | #2,090 | 30 |
| 1987 | #1,609 | 77 | #2,468 | 22 |
| 1986 | #1,367 | 94 | #1,791 | 34 |
| 1985 | #1,096 | 132 | #1,916 | 30 |
| 1984 | #1,184 | 111 | #1,320 | 50 |
| 1983 | #1,120 | 120 | #2,085 | 25 |
| 1982 | #1,041 | 139 | #1,734 | 33 |
| 1981 | #940 | 158 | #1,396 | 46 |
| 1980 | #812 | 198 | #1,111 | 66 |
| 1979 | #794 | 199 | #1,070 | 69 |
| 1978 | #734 | 213 | #1,087 | 64 |
| 1977 | #636 | 262 | #882 | 92 |
| 1976 | #622 | 251 | #776 | 114 |
| 1975 | #1,162 | 99 | #712 | 135 |
| 1974 | #1,473 | 67 | #767 | 111 |
| 1973 | #1,266 | 82 | #710 | 128 |
| 1972 | #1,448 | 67 | #697 | 133 |
| 1971 | #1,266 | 87 | #746 | 120 |
| 1970 | #1,196 | 95 | #839 | 92 |
| 1969 | #1,242 | 81 | #1,086 | 51 |
| 1968 | #1,575 | 53 | #1,250 | 37 |
| 1967 | #1,324 | 68 | #1,274 | 35 |
| 1966 | #1,548 | 52 | #1,237 | 37 |
| 1965 | #1,448 | 58 | #1,318 | 34 |
| 1964 | #1,635 | 49 | #1,172 | 43 |
| 1963 | #1,715 | 45 | #1,585 | 25 |
| 1962 | #1,708 | 44 | #1,625 | 24 |
| 1961 | #1,955 | 35 | #2,322 | 13 |
| 1960 | #2,246 | 27 | #1,692 | 23 |
| 1959 | #1,951 | 33 | #2,111 | 15 |
| 1958 | #2,025 | 30 | #2,642 | 10 |
| 1957 | #3,309 | 13 | #1,887 | 18 |
| 1956 | #3,048 | 15 | #3,216 | 7 |
| 1955 | #3,778 | 10 | #2,219 | 13 |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | #2,207 | 13 |
| 1953 | #2,812 | 15 | #2,186 | 13 |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | #2,376 | 11 |
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | #2,844 | 8 |
| 1950 | #3,235 | 11 | #2,207 | 12 |
| 1949 | #3,892 | 8 | #2,022 | 14 |
| 1948 | #2,701 | 14 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | #3,370 | 6 |
| 1946 | #3,430 | 9 | #3,173 | 6 |
| 1945 | #3,132 | 9 | #1,633 | 17 |
| 1944 | #3,378 | 8 | #2,467 | 9 |
| 1943 | #4,196 | 6 | #2,405 | 10 |
| 1942 | — | #2,712 | 8 | |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 | #2,872 | 7 |
| 1940 | #3,208 | 8 | — | |
| 1939 | #2,592 | 11 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #3,450 | 7 | — | |
| 1937 | #3,146 | 8 | #2,680 | 8 |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #2,184 | 11 |
| 1935 | — | #2,396 | 10 | |
| 1934 | #2,923 | 9 | #2,266 | 11 |
| 1933 | #4,218 | 5 | #3,004 | 7 |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | #3,763 | 5 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | #3,697 | 6 |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | #2,912 | 9 |
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | #3,362 | 9 | — | |
| 1924 | #4,002 | 7 | — | |
| 1923 | — | #3,822 | 6 | |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 | #3,872 | 6 |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | — | |
| 1920 | — | #4,286 | 5 | |
| 1919 | #2,813 | 11 | — | |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | #3,919 | 6 | — | |
| 1915 | #3,795 | 6 | #3,825 | 5 |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1915
The first year at least five girls were named Jammie! It came in at #3,795, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1917–1918, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Jammie is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Jammie in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Jammie
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2014
- Biggest jump: 540 spots in 1976
- Biggest drop: 128 spots in 1981
Rise & fade · girls
61 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 1976 at #622 (251 births)
- Births halved by 1983, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 6 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 6 yrs · run 1976–1981
Share of babies · girls
1 in 5,837
- Highest: 1 in 5,837 girls born in 1976 were named Jammie (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 223,294 girls born in 2014 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1970s
- 35.1% of all girls named Jammie (1,422) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2015
- Mostly girls until 2014, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 28 | #2,813 (1919) | #3,834 |
| 1920s | 43 | #3,362 (1925) | #4,370 |
| 1930s | 47 | #2,592 (1939) | #3,284 |
| 1940s | 75 | #2,701 (1948) | #3,609 |
| 1950s | 147 | #1,951 (1959) | #3,411 |
| 1960s | 512 | #1,242 (1969) | #1,640 |
| 1970s | 1,422 | #622 (1976) | #1,060 |
| 1980s | 1,204 | #812 (1980) | #1,230 |
| 1990s | 378 | #2,081 (1990) | #3,533 |
| 2000s | 152 | #4,981 (2000) | #7,585 |
| 2010s | 38 | #11,181 (2011) | #12,700 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Jammie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: