Jane

#221 for girls in 2025, 1,380 births · Last seen for boys in 2003 at #10,894
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1946 · 8,971 births
Debut · girls
215 births
In top 100 · girls
60 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
379,876
since 1880

Jane over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201960peak #35, 1946girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2211,380—
2024#2691,186—
2023#2811,116—
2022#2901,089—
2021#2661,172—
2020#2631,169—
2019#2771,189—
2018#2901,133—
2017#2821,157—
2016#2791,135—
2015#2901,112—
2014#3221,026—
2013#357898—
2012#343927—
2011#367868—
2010#385833—
2009#386831—
2008#389826—
2007#424775—
2006#477665—
2005#472651—
2004#459657—
2003#427704#10,8945
2002#417696—
2001#423671—
2000#437647—
1999#438618—
1998#415638—
1997#404648—
1996#407639—
1995#418618—
1994#369706—
1993#368691—
1992#395652#8,4355
1991#363708#5,5219
1990#345773#5,8238
1989#325779#5,6158
1988#340723#5,7517
1987#357668#6,0896
1986#356669#4,13010
1985#335709#4,3339
1984#323725#5,5616
1983#298784#5,4846
1982#289845#6,3855
1981#314762#4,9617
1980#312775—
1979#325720#6,0565
1978#328699—
1977#318744#4,1648
1976#320697#5,5875
1975#300782#5,4645
1974#288827#3,8378
1973#260957#5,1015
1972#2381,160#4,4416
1971#2321,296#4,3756
1970#2021,601—
1969#1701,880#4,4045
1968#1462,192#3,1078
1967#1272,729#2,61110
1966#1113,213#2,9868
1965#953,927#1,98716
1964#934,567#3,2827
1963#755,767#2,53911
1962#736,114#2,36412
1961#726,365#1,87619
1960#676,586#1,85819
1959#676,864#2,03316
1958#617,199#1,72421
1957#567,788#1,95217
1956#508,241#2,62810
1955#508,343#1,90217
1954#498,343#1,82618
1953#438,913#1,67721
1952#429,322#1,93916
1951#438,942#1,68320
1950#398,964#1,65720
1949#418,719#1,70219
1948#398,781#1,65620
1947#369,943#1,78618
1946#358,971#1,15736
1945#367,639#1,63317
1944#416,564#1,57419
1943#446,032#1,57720
1942#465,707#1,42124
1941#465,090#1,33325
1940#475,091#1,25129
1939#464,771#1,32325
1938#444,786#1,31026
1937#424,702#1,48121
1936#424,719#1,29626
1935#434,646#1,65618
1934#484,358#1,65818
1933#474,377#1,64418
1932#494,348#1,71618
1931#504,532#1,58920
1930#554,575#1,60221
1929#624,353#1,67220
1928#624,411#1,64721
1927#604,695#1,43627
1926#564,641#1,60522
1925#534,881#1,53424
1924#535,104#1,96417
1923#554,917#2,61411
1922#554,805#1,88318
1921#475,188#2,50212
1920#485,054#2,9679
1919#534,527#1,88217
1918#534,730#2,69910
1917#554,258#2,18813
1916#623,826#3,5166
1915#693,264#1,87815
1914#712,340—
1913#811,759#2,2737
1912#891,390—
1911#98937—
1910#116709#1,4216
1909#116626—
1908#130531#1,3735
1907#124526#1,3455
1906#140438—
1905#151393—
1904#142395—
1903#143381—
1902#142388—
1901#150325—
1900#128495—
1899#128382—
1898#130406—
1897#125396—
1896#115413—
1895#119394—
1894#119390—
1893#123354—
1892#113396—
1891#102379—
1890#108372—
1889#103374—
1888#92446—
1887#107288—
1886#105306—
1885#91330—
1884#98295—
1883#102247—
1882#101254—
1881#99216—
1880#98215—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Jane was already there! It came in at #98, and was given to 215 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1884, when fewer than 300 girls a year got the name.

Where Jane is popular in 1960

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Jane, so not publishedAKMaine: #33 for girls · 82 births · 1 in 121 girlsMEVermont: #39 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 133 girlsVTNew Hampshire: #50 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 177 girlsNHWashington: #114 for girls · 63 births · 1 in 449 girlsWAIdaho: #75 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 268 girlsIDMontana: #119 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 446 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #45 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 154 girlsNDMinnesota: #33 for girls · 304 births · 1 in 127 girlsMNIllinois: #54 for girls · 452 births · 1 in 238 girlsILWisconsin: #31 for girls · 395 births · 1 in 114 girlsWIMichigan: #67 for girls · 325 births · 1 in 272 girlsMINew York: #63 for girls · 640 births · 1 in 262 girlsNYMassachusetts: #39 for girls · 359 births · 1 in 147 girlsMARhode Island: #38 for girls · 52 births · 1 in 157 girlsRIOregon: #74 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 305 girlsORNevada: #134 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 465 girlsNVWyoming: #124 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 415 girlsWYSouth Dakota: #44 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 173 girlsSDIowa: #36 for girls · 214 births · 1 in 132 girlsIAIndiana: #57 for girls · 222 births · 1 in 227 girlsINOhio: #66 for girls · 410 births · 1 in 257 girlsOHPennsylvania: #58 for girls · 457 births · 1 in 244 girlsPANew Jersey: #64 for girls · 232 births · 1 in 249 girlsNJConnecticut: #52 for girls · 117 births · 1 in 210 girlsCTCalifornia: #117 for girls · 340 births · 1 in 508 girlsCAUtah: #107 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 427 girlsUTColorado: #120 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 454 girlsCONebraska: #48 for girls · 77 births · 1 in 188 girlsNEMissouri: #67 for girls · 157 births · 1 in 285 girlsMOKentucky: #74 for girls · 98 births · 1 in 327 girlsKYWest Virginia: #77 for girls · 55 births · 1 in 316 girlsWVVirginia: #88 for girls · 105 births · 1 in 379 girlsVAMaryland: #71 for girls · 111 births · 1 in 272 girlsMDDelaware: #41 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 163 girlsDEArizona: #145 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 522 girlsAZNew Mexico: #158 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 588 girlsNMKansas: #71 for girls · 74 births · 1 in 284 girlsKSArkansas: #131 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 659 girlsARTennessee: #118 for girls · 64 births · 1 in 569 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #88 for girls · 128 births · 1 in 379 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #102 for girls · 59 births · 1 in 442 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #89 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 322 girlsDCOklahoma: #139 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 583 girlsOKLouisiana: #121 for girls · 80 births · 1 in 485 girlsLAMississippi: #271 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,491 girlsMSAlabama: #130 for girls · 56 births · 1 in 620 girlsALGeorgia: #109 for girls · 93 births · 1 in 479 girlsGAHawaii: #105 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 375 girlsHITexas: #174 for girls · 143 births · 1 in 793 girlsTXFlorida: #136 for girls · 89 births · 1 in 565 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Wisconsin#31 · 1 in 114
  2. Maine#33 · 1 in 121
  3. Minnesota#33 · 1 in 127
  4. Iowa#36 · 1 in 132
  5. Rhode Island#38 · 1 in 157

Best ever in a state: #2 in Hawaii, 1935.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Wisconsin#313951 in 114
Maine#33821 in 121
Minnesota#333041 in 127
Iowa#362141 in 132
Rhode Island#38521 in 157
Massachusetts#393591 in 147
Vermont#39271 in 133
Delaware#41281 in 163
South Dakota#44411 in 173
North Dakota#45431 in 154
Nebraska#48771 in 188
New Hampshire#50311 in 177
Connecticut#521171 in 210
Illinois#544521 in 238
Indiana#572221 in 227
Pennsylvania#584571 in 244
New York#636401 in 262
New Jersey#642321 in 249
Ohio#664101 in 257
Michigan#673251 in 272
Missouri#671571 in 285
Kansas#71741 in 284
Maryland#711111 in 272
Kentucky#74981 in 327
Oregon#74531 in 305
Idaho#75241 in 268
West Virginia#77551 in 316
North Carolina#881281 in 379
Virginia#881051 in 379
District of Columbia#89411 in 322
South Carolina#102591 in 442
Hawaii#105161 in 375
Utah#107251 in 427
Georgia#109931 in 479
Washington#114631 in 449
California#1173401 in 508
Tennessee#118641 in 569
Montana#119151 in 446
Colorado#120431 in 454
Louisiana#121801 in 485
Wyoming#12471 in 415
Alabama#130561 in 620
Arkansas#131271 in 659
Nevada#13451 in 465
Florida#136891 in 565
Oklahoma#139361 in 583
Arizona#145291 in 522
New Mexico#158211 in 588
Texas#1741431 in 793
Mississippi#271171 in 1,491
Alaska———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Jane
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 48 spots since 2024 (#269 → #221)
  • 42 spots since 2020 (#263 → #221)
  • 69 spots since 2015 (#290 → #221)
  • Biggest jump: 53 spots in 2007 (#477 → #424)
  • Biggest drop: 49 spots in 1995 (#369 → #418)
Rise & fade · girls
66 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1946 at #35 (8,971 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 19 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 60 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 60 yrs · run 1911–1965
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 171
  • Highest: 1 in 171 girls born in 1945 were named Jane (0.58%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,165 girls born in 2025 (0.09%)
  • Its best rank, #35 in 1946, was only 1 in 175 (0.57%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 21.8% of all girls named Jane (82,919) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,971#91 (1885)#100
1890s3,882#102 (1891)#118
1900s4,498#116 (1909)#137
1910s27,740#53 (1918)#75
1920s48,049#47 (1921)#55
1930s45,814#42 (1936)#47
1940s72,537#35 (1946)#41
1950s82,919#39 (1950)#50
1960s43,340#67 (1960)#103
1970s9,483#202 (1970)#281
1980s7,439#289 (1982)#325
1990s6,691#345 (1990)#392
2000s7,123#386 (2009)#431
2010s10,278#277 (2019)#319
2020s7,112#221 (2025)#265

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Jane in 1960

girls
#67
6,586 births · 1 in 307 girls
boys
#1,858
19 births · 1 in 112,227 boys

Top girls' names in 1960

  1. #1Mary51,472
  2. #2Susan39,208
  3. #3Linda37,316
  4. #4Karen36,378
  5. #5Donna34,138
  6. #6Lisa33,693
  7. #7Patricia32,113
  8. #8Debra26,732
  9. #9Cynthia26,706
  10. #10Deborah25,266
  11. #67Jane6,586

Top boys' names in 1960

  1. #1David85,929
  2. #2Michael84,153
  3. #3James76,815
  4. #4John76,096
  5. #5Robert72,357
  6. #6Mark58,727
  7. #7William49,361
  8. #8Richard43,553
  9. #9Thomas39,278
  10. #10Steven33,878
  11. #1,858Jane19
More about 1960

girls

2,021,941 girls got a published name in 1960; 1 in 307 of them was named Jane, which outranked 99.1% of the 7,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jane
  1. #64Lynn6,850
  2. #65Valerie6,717
  3. #66Wanda6,674
  4. #67Jane6,586
  5. #68Betty6,501
  6. #69Peggy6,428
  7. #70Shirley6,411
Biggest movers since 1959
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,798Lisha#2,395 → #597
  2. ↑ 1,223Elana#2,108 → #885
  3. ↑ 667Leisha#1,537 → #870
  4. ↑ 513Misty#1,214 → #701
  5. ↑ 462Loriann#1,396 → #934
Fallers
  1. ↓ 421Taryn#771 → #1,192
  2. ↓ 335Cheryll#993 → #1,328
  3. ↓ 305Marilynn#724 → #1,029
  4. ↓ 304Drema#997 → #1,301
  5. ↓ 258Merrie#978 → #1,236

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

2,132,320 boys got a published name in 1960; 1 in 112,227 of them was named Jane, which outranked 59.6% of the 4,598 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 29.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Jane
  1. #1,812Watson20
  2. #1,812Wellington20
  3. #1,812Zackary20
  4. #1,858Jane19
  5. #1,858Albino19
  6. #1,858Allie19
  7. #1,858Anson19
  8. #1,910Alfonse18
  9. #1,910Alvino18
  10. #1,910Arlo18

Tied with 51 names at #1,858; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1959
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,061Stephon#3,988 → #927
  2. ↑ 1,039Kennedy#1,759 → #720
  3. ↑ 489Darryle#1,416 → #927
  4. ↑ 379Garret#1,360 → #981
  5. ↑ 373Darryll#1,324 → #951
Fallers
  1. ↓ 333Grayling#987 → #1,320
  2. ↓ 327Lucious#946 → #1,273
  3. ↓ 274Brion#919 → #1,193
  4. ↓ 261Gail#747 → #1,008
  5. ↓ 254Delton#939 → #1,193

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1960 →