Janeen
Last seen for girls in 2020 at #15,088
- Peak · girls
- 1969 · 269 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 6,544since 1930
Janeen over time
Rank among girls' names. Janeen has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2024 | — | |
| 2023 | — | |
| 2022 | — | |
| 2021 | — | |
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 |
| 2019 | — | |
| 2018 | #9,806 | 10 |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | #12,876 | 7 |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 |
| 2013 | — | |
| 2012 | #7,804 | 15 |
| 2011 | #7,783 | 15 |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 |
| 2009 | #10,679 | 10 |
| 2008 | #8,109 | 15 |
| 2007 | #6,323 | 21 |
| 2006 | #7,868 | 15 |
| 2005 | #5,999 | 20 |
| 2004 | #9,264 | 11 |
| 2003 | #12,408 | 7 |
| 2002 | #5,897 | 19 |
| 2001 | #6,067 | 18 |
| 2000 | #6,808 | 15 |
| 1999 | #5,039 | 21 |
| 1998 | #6,360 | 15 |
| 1997 | #4,239 | 25 |
| 1996 | #3,831 | 28 |
| 1995 | #4,348 | 23 |
| 1994 | #3,536 | 31 |
| 1993 | #2,768 | 43 |
| 1992 | #2,869 | 41 |
| 1991 | #2,519 | 49 |
| 1990 | #2,640 | 44 |
| 1989 | #2,119 | 58 |
| 1988 | #2,539 | 42 |
| 1987 | #2,065 | 53 |
| 1986 | #2,265 | 45 |
| 1985 | #1,445 | 86 |
| 1984 | #1,350 | 89 |
| 1983 | #1,328 | 90 |
| 1982 | #1,198 | 113 |
| 1981 | #853 | 182 |
| 1980 | #1,238 | 106 |
| 1979 | #1,210 | 107 |
| 1978 | #1,014 | 134 |
| 1977 | #1,062 | 123 |
| 1976 | #1,016 | 123 |
| 1975 | #973 | 127 |
| 1974 | #847 | 155 |
| 1973 | #837 | 156 |
| 1972 | #769 | 180 |
| 1971 | #698 | 218 |
| 1970 | #625 | 272 |
| 1969 | #610 | 269 |
| 1968 | #732 | 181 |
| 1967 | #758 | 168 |
| 1966 | #790 | 156 |
| 1965 | #874 | 131 |
| 1964 | #808 | 167 |
| 1963 | #923 | 130 |
| 1962 | #846 | 155 |
| 1961 | #902 | 143 |
| 1960 | #877 | 140 |
| 1959 | #936 | 125 |
| 1958 | #969 | 114 |
| 1957 | #910 | 125 |
| 1956 | #879 | 128 |
| 1955 | #879 | 122 |
| 1954 | #754 | 152 |
| 1953 | #886 | 113 |
| 1952 | #747 | 141 |
| 1951 | #961 | 93 |
| 1950 | #997 | 84 |
| 1949 | #895 | 97 |
| 1948 | #1,015 | 74 |
| 1947 | #1,021 | 75 |
| 1946 | #985 | 72 |
| 1945 | #869 | 75 |
| 1944 | #1,104 | 50 |
| 1943 | #1,342 | 37 |
| 1942 | #1,804 | 22 |
| 1941 | #1,569 | 25 |
| 1940 | #1,682 | 22 |
| 1939 | #1,401 | 28 |
| 1938 | #1,413 | 28 |
| 1937 | #1,580 | 23 |
| 1936 | #1,691 | 20 |
| 1935 | #2,206 | 14 |
| 1934 | #1,771 | 19 |
| 1933 | #2,688 | 10 |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | #3,226 | 8 |
| 1930 | #4,550 | 5 |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Janeen! It came in at #4,550, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1932, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Janeen is popular in 1969
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Iowa#319 · 1 in 2,263
- New Jersey#373 · 1 in 2,610
- Colorado#407 · 1 in 2,720
- Pennsylvania#422 · 1 in 3,640
- Michigan#462 · 1 in 4,219
Best ever in a state: #187 in Utah, 1934.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #319 | 9 | 1 in 2,263 |
| New Jersey | #373 | 19 | 1 in 2,610 |
| Colorado | #407 | 6 | 1 in 2,720 |
| Pennsylvania | #422 | 23 | 1 in 3,640 |
| Michigan | #462 | 17 | 1 in 4,219 |
| Illinois | #468 | 22 | 1 in 3,854 |
| Wisconsin | #474 | 6 | 1 in 5,423 |
| Ohio | #478 | 17 | 1 in 4,958 |
| California | #492 | 46 | 1 in 3,475 |
| Massachusetts | #589 | 5 | 1 in 8,451 |
| Missouri | #594 | 5 | 1 in 6,858 |
| New York | #602 | 24 | 1 in 5,790 |
| Florida | #727 | 6 | 1 in 7,396 |
| Texas | #961 | 9 | 1 in 11,171 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Janeen
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2020
- Biggest jump: 385 spots in 1981 (#1,238 → #853)
- Biggest drop: 345 spots in 1982 (#853 → #1,198)
- Debuted 1930
- Peaked 1969 at #610 (269 births)
- Births halved by 1975, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 30 yrs · run 1949–1975
- Highest: 1 in 6,271 girls born in 1969 were named Janeen (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 323,310 girls born in 2020 (0.00%)
- 25.1% of all girls named Janeen (1,640) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 155 | #1,401 (1939) | #2,281 |
| 1940s | 549 | #869 (1945) | #1,229 |
| 1950s | 1,197 | #747 (1952) | #892 |
| 1960s | 1,640 | #610 (1969) | #812 |
| 1970s | 1,595 | #625 (1970) | #905 |
| 1980s | 864 | #853 (1981) | #1,640 |
| 1990s | 320 | #2,519 (1991) | #3,815 |
| 2000s | 151 | #5,897 (2002) | #7,942 |
| 2010s | 68 | #7,783 (2011) | #11,161 |
| 2020s | 5 | #15,088 (2020) | #15,088 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Janeen in 1969
Top girls' names in 1969
More about 1969
girls
1,687,016 girls got a published name in 1969; 1 in 6,271 of them was named Janeen, which outranked 93.0% of the 8,708 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).